Photo of the Day Archive
2005 - 2006
http://www.americanpatrol.com/ABP/PHOTO-OF-THE-DAY/Menu-Photos.html
|
THESE ARE THE SENATORS WHO VOTED TO GIVE ILLEGAL
ALIENS SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS. REGARDLESS OF
POLITICAL PARTY, THESE POLITICIANS NEED TO BE
DEFEATED IN 2006, 2008 OR 2010 WHENEVER THEY COME UP
FOR OFFICE. |
SEND THIS TO ANYONE YOU KNOW IN ANY OF THE STATES
LISTED. THE ENTIRE POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES
NEED TO KNOW THIS INFORMATION. THAT IS UNLESS THEY
DO NOT MIND SHARING THEIR SOCIAL SECURITY WITH
FOREIGN WORKERS WHEN AMERICAN CITIZENS ARE BEING
LEFT OUT. |
Grouped by
Home State
the Senators who voted for giving illegals Social Security
:
|
Alabama:
|
|
|
|
Alaska:
|
|
Stevens (R-AK),
Yea
|
|
Arizona:
|
|
McCain (R-AZ),
Yea
|
|
Arkansas:
|
Lincoln (D-AR),
Yea
|
Pryor (D-AR),
Yea
|
|
California:
|
Boxer (D-CA),
Yea
|
Feinstein (D-CA),
Yea
|
|
Colorado:
|
|
Salazar (D-CO),
Yea
|
|
Connecticut:
|
Dodd (D-CT),
Yea
|
Lieberman (D-CT),
Yea
|
|
Delaware:
|
Biden (D-DE),
Yea
|
Carper (D-DE),
Yea
|
|
Florida:
|
Martinez
(R-FL), Yea
|
|
|
Georgia:
|
|
|
|
Hawaii:
|
Akaka (D-HI),
Yea
|
Inouye (D-HI),
Yea
|
|
Idaho:
|
|
|
|
Illinois:
|
Durbin (D-IL),
Yea
|
Obama (D-IL),
Yea
|
|
Indiana:
|
Bayh (D-IN),
Yea
|
Lugar (R-IN),
Yea
|
|
Iowa:
|
|
Harkin (D-IA),
Yea
|
|
Kansas:
|
Brownback (R-KS),
Yea
|
|
|
Kentucky:
|
|
|
|
Louisiana:
|
Landrieu (D-LA),
Yea
|
|
|
Maine:
|
|
|
|
Maryland:
|
Mikulski (D-MD),
Yea
|
Sarbanes (D-MD),
Yea
|
|
Massachusetts:
|
Kennedy (D-MA),
Yea
|
Kerry (D-MA),
Yea
|
|
Michigan:
|
Levin (D-MI),
Yea
|
Stabenow (D-MI),
Yea
|
|
Minnesota:
|
|
|
|
Mississippi:
|
|
|
|
Missouri:
|
|
|
|
Montana:
|
Baucus (D-MT),
Yea
|
|
|
Nebraska:
|
Hagel (R-NE),
Yea
|
|
|
Nevada:
|
|
Reid (D-NV),
Yea
|
|
New
Hampshire:
|
|
|
|
New
Jersey:
|
Lautenberg (D-NJ),
Yea
|
Menendez (D-NJ),
Yea
|
|
New
Mexico:
|
Bingaman (D-NM),
Yea
|
|
|
New
York:
|
Clinton (D-NY),
Yea
|
Schumer (D-NY),
Yea
|
|
North Carolina:
|
|
|
|
North Dakota:
|
|
Dorgan (D-ND),
Yea
|
|
Ohio:
|
DeWine (R-OH),
Yea
|
Voinovich (R-OH),
Yea
|
|
Oklahoma:
|
|
|
|
Oregon:
|
|
Wyden (D-OR),
Yea
|
|
Pennsylvania:
|
|
Specter (R-PA),
Yea
|
|
Rhode Island:
|
Chafee (R-RI),
Yea
|
Reed (D-RI),
Yea
|
|
South Carolina:
|
|
Graham (R-SC),
Yea
|
|
South Dakota:
|
Johnson (D-SD),
Yea
|
|
|
Tennessee:
|
|
|
|
Texas:
|
|
|
|
Utah:
|
|
|
|
Vermont:
|
Jeffords (I-VT),
Yea
|
Leahy (D-VT),
Yea
|
|
Virginia:
|
|
|
|
Washington:
|
Cantwell (D-WA),
Yea
|
Murray (D-WA),
Yea
|
|
West Virginia:
|
|
Rockefeller (D-WV),
Not Voting
|
|
Wisconsin:
|
Feingold (D-WI),
Yea
|
Kohl (D-WI),
Yea
|
|
Wyoming:
|
|
|
Legal vs. illegal immigrants. 1607-1830. As yet, no law was yet
formed to decide who were the legal or illegal immigrants.
Therefore, everyone who came to ...
Results 1 - 10 of about 26,200,000 for LEGAL vs. ILLEGAL
Lou Dobbs-CNN poll 3/29/06
|
Do you believe that the illegal employers of the 11
million to 20 million illegal aliens in the United
States also should be granted amnesty?
|
 |
|
Yes
|
|
6%
|
272 votes
|
 |
|
No
|
|
94%
|
|
"In the first place we should insist that if the immigrant who comes
here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he
shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an
outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or
birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the man's becoming in
very fact an American, and nothing but an American...
There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an
American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have
room for but one flag, the American flag, and this excludes the red
flag, which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization, just
as much as it excludes any foreign flag of a nation to which we are
hostile...We have room for but one language here, and that is the
English language...and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is
a loyalty to the American people."
--Theodore Roosevelt, 1919
U.S. Fate Hangs in Balance
Today, March 27, 2006 the Senate Judiciary Committee
takes up the the issue of immigration reform. They will talk about the
need for guest workers and border enforcement, but no one will have the
nerve to admit that Mexico is invading the United States with hostile
intent.
"America watched as an alien army marched through our streets and
demanded surrender," said Glenn Spencer of American Patrol. "Yet, our
President is fighting for their side, and our Congress refuses to face
the threat - it is truly the age of insanity."
Source:
Immigration Watchdog
http://www.immigrationwatchdog.com/
They openly state they have "The armor, the infantry and the artillery" to
wage
war here.
This video PROVES beyond any doubt, the people marching in our streets under
Mexican and other foreign flags, over pending immigration legislation, are
engaged in a WAR against our nation.
The U.S. Government has failed its duty to protect this land from these
invaders; invaders who are openly stating they intend to takeover a portion
of
this land and carve out their own "Mestizo nation of Aztlan."
Click below to play the video
http://tinyurl.com/pqzpe
US Congressional Switchboard Toll-free Numbers
1-800-833-6354
1-866-340-9281
1-877-762-8762
1-866-808-0065
1-888-355-3588
1-866-220-0044
ARE IMMIGRATION
DEMOS FRONT FOR AZTLAN?
Thursday, March 30, 2006 - FreeMarketNews.com
Are the recent demonstrations all
across America actually pro-immigration, or are they a cover for the
reconquista movement, which intends to restore the American Southwest to
Mexican control?
Paul Joseph Watson on an Internet news site cites Voz de Aztlan leader
Ernesto Cienfuegos, who during the riots in France last year predicted
similar scenes of chaos would be coming to the streets of America. On
November 8, Watson notes, Cienfuegos declareded that, "Today, here in Los
Angeles, we are already seeing ominous signs of an impending social
explosion that will make the French rebellion by Muslim and immigrant youths
seem tame by comparison. All the ingredients are present including a hostile
and racist police as in France."
Watson reminds us that the Aztlan
goal of "la reconquista" is "to cede and take over the entirety of the
southern states by any means necessary and impose a Communist militant
dictatorship." He predicts that "President Bush's blanket amnesty program
goes a long way to helping the extremists achieve their aim." He also notes
that "If the racist 'Sensenbrenner Legislation' passes the U.S. Senate,
there is no doubt that a massive civil disobedience movement will emerge."-
ST
http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=10383
Red Alert:
Amnesty for Tens of Millions of Invaders on the Horizon
By Selwyn Duke - SelwynDuke@aol.com
While the invasion of our nation through the southern border continues
unabated, our fearless leaders are once again busy cooking up cures that are
worse than the disease. The latest scheme is a form of de facto amnesty
euphemistically called the “Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act.” And
if it passes, it could be America’s final act.
Authored by Ted Kennedy and John McCain and poised to emerge from the Senate
Judiciary Committee, the bill has many elements, the most troubling of which
is that it offers people here illegally “a path to citizenship.”
Here’s how it works: creating a “new H-5A temporary visa category,” illegal
aliens would have to register with the government, pay two-thousand dollars
worth of fines in total, have a criminal background check and pass an
English literacy exam. Then, if they were employed, they could apply for
citizenship in six years. What’s wrong with this, you ask?
First of all, just like any other plan that allows those who entered our
nation illegally to stay, it rewards the very behavior we want to eliminate.
It sends a clear message to the world: break into America like a thief in
the night, fly under the radar when you have to (and accept government
benefits courtesy of the average taxpayer sucker when they’re offered),
persevere long enough, and sooner or later some feckless, pusillanimous
American politicians will grant you amnesty. Come one, come all. ‘Tis the
land of the free ride and a home for the knaves.
When did we forget that rewarding bad behavior begets more bad behavior?
As if this weren’t bad enough, this bill would have a culturally toxic side
effect. It would lead to the naturalization of many millions of immigrants
in addition to the ones already here illegally, and this could occur during
just the next decade. But before I delve further, it’s time for a little
background.
For most of our history we were much like any other nation. We understood
that if immigration was to be allowed, it must be limited and controlled,
ensuring your land’s stability and culture will not be threatened by too
great an infusion of incongruous and perhaps unassimilable cultural
elements. Thus, while the number of immigrants did fluctuate throughout our
history, prior to the mid-1960s our shores saw an average of only about
250,000 annually. Moreover, realizing the importance of safeguarding our
culture, we had (since 1924) admitted immigrants in accordance with the
“National Origins Act,” which mandated that a given immigrant group would be
allowed entry to the extent to which it was represented in the general US
population. But all this changed in 1965.
What happened that year? The “Immigration Reform Act of 1965” is what
happened. This legislation changed both the face of immigration and that of
America, as it caused legal immigration levels to spike upwards to about one
million a year. Additionally, it created a situation in which 85% of
immigrants now come from the Third World and half from Spanish-speaking
countries, factors which have had a jarring effect upon our culture. Press
two for Spanish anyone?
Now, you may ask, how is this germane to the current poisoned pill bill?
Well, one of the authors of the disastrous 1965 legislation was . . . guess
who? Yep, you’ve got it. The poster boy for 24/7 gin mill operation himself,
old Ted Kennedy.
But now let’s fast forward to his present attempt at social engineering. Why
would the current legislation amount to a prescription for unprecedented
immigration?
First of all, it has been estimated that perhaps as many as 20 million
illegals currently reside in our nation. Of course, we don’t know how many
would avail themselves of the amnesty offer, but let’s say, for argument’s
sake, that “only” twelve million ultimately qualified for citizenship. Well,
then in six years you’d have twelve million immigrants added to the six
million who would have entered legally during that period, the already
excessive number allowed by Kennedy’s 1965 brainchild.
But it gets even worse.
Since many of these invaders would be married, upon naturalization they
would be able to bring their families here as well, perhaps doubling their
number. In other words, we could be talking about increasing our legal
population by 8 percent (24 million) or more during the next ten years.
Still, though, there’s more dire news.
The bill doesn’t offer much of substance in the way of proposals to stop
illegal immigration, presenting, in typical politician style, nothing but
lip service in that regard. But even if it did, with the track record of our
government, one involving a wink-and-a-nod steadfast refusal to close the
borders, why should we believe it?
Thus, millions more invaders would pour into our land, making her even more
“secure and orderly” and creating a “need” for yet another “temporary visa,”
another amnesty scheme, another kick in the teeth to law-abiding Americans.
And with the pro-invasion lobby buttressed with tens of millions more voting
partisans, its momentum would be irresistible. It would be mourning in
America.
Of course, I’m sure Kennedy and company will peddle this act with all the
salesmanship of a used car dealer. But if the song and dance routine sounds
convincing, just consider the bill of goods Kennedy sold us when lobbying
for his 1965 piece of genius. According to Peter Brimelow in his piece The
Case against Immigration as We Know It, Kennedy claimed that,
First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually.
Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains
substantially the same. . . . Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will
not be upset. . . . Contrary to the charges in some quarters, [the bill]
will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or
the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia. . . . In the
final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure
is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think.
I ask you, would you buy an immigration bill from this man? Fool me once,
shame on Kennedy. Fool me twice, shame on my stupidity.
And don’t think I’m letting John McCain off the hook. While the Arizona
senator was fighting for his country when Kennedy conjured up his first nail
in America’s cultural coffin, now, sadly, McCain is most assuredly fighting
against it. He appears more and more a true Manchurian candidate. It’s time
for the old soldier to just fade away.
The defenders of the Insecure America and Disorderly Immigration Act protest
that it doesn’t amount to amnesty, saying that the invaders must admit their
wrongdoing and pay a fine. My, my, aren’t we becoming Draconian? I wonder,
does this work with other crimes as well? I mean, can I burglarize Ted
Kennedy’s mansion and opt for the punishment of confession and a modest
monetary payment? Hey, I can issue mea culpas as well as the next guy. And I
can even do it in an American accent.
The consequence of coming here illegally is supposed to be deportation.
Thus, anything short of that is a form of amnesty. And we should march on
Washington with pitchforks. We were promised the immigration levels (already
excessive) of the Immigration Act of 1965. To now peddle this legislative
sleight of hand – which would cause the nation within our nation to
metastasize further – and tell us it’s in our best interests is a true slap
in the face.
It’s imperative that we deport the invaders and institute a moratorium on
all immigration so we can get our own cultural house in order. The last
thing we need is amnesty, and this bill is cultural suicide.
Any politician who supports it should be considered a traitor.
Activism note: While this bill will probably hit a roadblock in the House,
it seems to have the votes to emerge from Senate committee and may even be
passed by the Senate itself. Please use the information below, contact your
representatives and let them know in no uncertain terms that you’ll vote
against any politician who supports such insanity. Deportation is not a
dirty word.
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing.” – Edmund Burke
http://www.house.gov
http://www.senate.gov
Capitol Hill Switchboard: (202) 224-3121
=============================
National Immigration Rallies Against New Legislation
All Headline News - 1 hour ago
Phoenix, Arizona (AHN) - Thousands of people across the country protest
against legislation cracking down on illegal immigrants, with demonstrators
rallying in Los Angeles, Phoenix and Atlanta staging school walkouts,
marches and work stoppages. ...
Thousands march in Phoenix calling for immigration reform USA Today
20,000 in Phoenix rally for migrants Arizona Republic
Washington Times - ABC News - MTV.com - KPHO Phoenix
- all 349 related »
20,000 in Phoenix Rally for Immigrant Rights
============================================================================
Under Title 8 Section 1325 of the U.S.
Code, "Improper Entry by Alien," any citizen of any country other than the
United States who:
Enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other
than as designated by immigration officers; or Eludes examination or
inspection by immigration officers; or
Attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false
or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact;
has committed a federal crime.
Violations are punishable by criminal fines and imprisonment for up to six
months. Repeat offenses can bring up to two years in prison. Additional
civil fines may be imposed at the discretion of immigration judges, but
civil fines do not negate the criminal sanctions or nature of the offense.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/8/chapters/12/subchapters/ii/parts/viii/sections/section_1325.html
===========================================================================
Federal Immigration and Nationality Act
Excerpts from the U.S. legal code referring to hiring illegal aliens.*
Federal Immigration and Nationality Act
Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii)
Recruitment and Employment of Illegal Aliens
Encouraging and Harboring Illegal Aliens
Enforcement
RICO —Citizen Recourse
Tax Crimes
Comment
Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii)
"Any person who . . . encourages or induces an illegal alien to . . . reside
. . . knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such . . . residence
is . . . in violation of law, shall be punished as provided . . . for each
illegal alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs . . . fined under
title 18 . . . imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both."
Section 274 felonies under the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, INA
274A(a)(1)(A):
A person (including a group of persons, business, organization, or local
government) commits a federal felony when she or he:
assists an illegal alien s/he should reasonably know is illegally in the
U.S. or who lacks employment authorization, by transporting, sheltering, or
assisting him or her to obtain employment, or
encourages that illegal alien to remain in the U.S. by referring him or her
to an employer or by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way,
or knowingly assists illegal aliens due to personal convictions.
Penalties upon conviction include criminal fines, imprisonment, and
forfeiture of vehicles and real property used to commit the crime. Anyone
employing or contracting with an illegal alien without verifying his or her
work authorization status is guilty of a misdemeanor. Aliens and employers
violating immigration laws are subject to arrest, detention, and seizure of
their vehicles or property. In addition, individuals or entities who engage
in racketeering enterprises that commit (or conspire to commit)
immigration-related felonies are subject to private civil suits for treble
damages and injunctive relief.
Recruitment and Employment of Illegal Aliens
It is unlawful to hire an alien, to recruit an alien, or to refer an illegal
alien for a fee, knowing the illegal alien is unauthorized to work in the
United States. It is equally unlawful to continue to employ an illegal alien
knowing that the illegal alien is unauthorized to work.
It is unlawful to hire any individual for employment in the United States
without complying with employment eligibility verification requirements.
Requirements include examination of identity documents and completion of
Form I-9 for every employee hired. Employers must retain all I-9s, and, with
three days' advance notice, the forms must be made available for inspection.
Employment includes any service or labor performed for any type of
remuneration within the United States, with the exception of sporadic
domestic service by an individual in a private home. "Day laborers" or other
casual workers engaged in any compensated activity (with the above
exception) are employees for purposes of immigration law. An employer
includes an agent or anyone acting directly or indirectly in the interest of
the employer. For purposes of verification of authorization to work,
employer also means an independent contractor, or a contractor other than
the person using the illegal alien labor.
The use of temporary or short-term contracts cannot be used to circumvent
the employment authorization verification requirements. If employment is to
be for less than the usual three days allowed for completing the I-9 Form
requirement, the form must be completed immediately at the time of hire.
An employer has constructive knowledge that an employee is an illegal
unauthorized worker if a reasonable person would infer it from the facts.
Constructive knowledge constituting a violation of federal law has been
found where (1) the I-9 employment eligibility form has not been properly
completed, including supporting documentation, (2) the employer has learned
from other individuals, media reports, or any source of information
available to the employer that the alien is unauthorized to work, or (3) the
employer acts with reckless disregard for the legal consequences of
permitting a third party to provide or introduce an illegal alien into the
employer's work force. Knowledge cannot be inferred solely on the basis of
an individual's accent or foreign appearance.
Actual specific knowledge is not required. For example, a newspaper article
stating that ballrooms depend on an illegal alien work force of dance
hostesses was held by the courts to be a reasonable ground for suspicion
that unlawful conduct had occurred.
It is illegal for nonprofit or religious organizations to knowingly assist
an employer to violate employment sanctions, regardless of claims that their
convictions require them to assist illegal aliens. Harboring or aiding
illegal aliens is not protected by the First Amendment. It is a felony to
establish a commercial enterprise for the purpose of evading any provision
of federal immigration law. Violators may be fined or imprisoned for up to
five years.
Encouraging and Harboring Illegal Aliens
It is a violation of law for any person to conceal, harbor, or shield from
detection in any place, including any building or means of transportation,
any illegal alien who is in the United States in violation of law. Harboring
means any conduct that tends to substantially facilitate an alien to remain
in the U.S. illegally. The sheltering need not be clandestine, and harboring
covers aliens arrested outdoors, as well as in a building. This provision
includes harboring an alien who entered the U.S. legally but has since lost
his legal status.
An employer can be convicted of the felony of harboring illegal aliens who
are his employees if he takes actions in reckless disregard of their illegal
status, such as ordering them to obtain false documents, altering records,
obstructing INS inspections, or taking other actions that facilitate the
alien's illegal employment. Any person who within any 12-month period hires
ten or more individuals with actual knowledge that they are illegal aliens
or unauthorized workers is guilty of felony harboring. It is also a felony
to encourage or induce an alien to come to or reside in the U.S. knowing or
recklessly disregarding the fact that the alien's entry or residence is in
violation of the law. This crime applies to any person, rather than just
employers of illegal aliens. Courts have ruled that "encouraging" includes
counseling illegal aliens to continue working in the U.S. or assisting them
to complete applications with false statements or obvious errors. The fact
that the alien is a refugee fleeing persecution is not a defense to this
felony, since U.S. law and the UN Protocol on Refugees both require that a
refugee must report to immigration authorities without delay upon entry to
the U.S.
The penalty for felony harboring is a fine and imprisonment for up to five
years. The penalty for felony alien smuggling is a fine and up to ten years'
imprisonment. Where the crime causes serious bodily injury or places the
life of any person in jeopardy, the penalty is a fine and up to twenty
years' imprisonment. If the criminal smuggling or harboring results in the
death of any person, the penalty can include life imprisonment. Convictions
for aiding, abetting, or conspiracy to commit alien smuggling or harboring,
carry the same penalties. Courts can impose consecutive prison sentences for
each alien smuggled or harbored. A court may order a convicted smuggler to
pay restitution if the illegal alien smuggled qualifies as a victim under
the Victim and Witness Protection Act. Conspiracy to commit crimes of
sheltering, harboring, or employing illegal aliens is a separate federal
offense punishable by a fine of up to $10,000 or five years' imprisonment.
Enforcement
A person or entity having knowledge of a violation or potential violation of
employer sanctions provisions may submit a signed written complaint to the
INS office with jurisdiction over the business or residence of the potential
violator, whether an employer, employee, or agent. The complaint must
include the names and addresses of both the complainant and the violator,
and detailed factual allegations, including date, time, and place of the
potential violation, and the specific conduct alleged to be a violation of
employer sanctions. By regulation, the INS will only investigate third-party
complaints that have a reasonable probability of validity. Designated INS
officers and employees, and all other officers whose duty it is to enforce
criminal laws, may make an arrest for violation of smuggling or harboring
illegal aliens.
State and local law enforcement officials have the general power to
investigate and arrest violators of federal immigration statutes without
prior INS knowledge or approval, as long as they are authorized to do so by
state law. There is no extant federal limitation on this authority. The 1996
immigration control legislation passed by Congress was intended to encourage
states and local agencies to participate in the process of enforcing federal
immigration laws. Immigration officers and local law enforcement officers
may detain an individual for a brief warrantless interrogation where
circumstances create a reasonable suspicion that the individual is illegally
present in the U.S. Specific facts constituting a reasonable suspicion
include evasive, nervous, or erratic behavior; dress or speech indicating
foreign citizenship; and presence in an area known to contain a
concentration of illegal aliens. Hispanic appearance alone is not
sufficient. Immigration officers and police must have a valid warrant or
valid employer's consent to enter workplaces or residences. Any vehicle used
to transport or harbor illegal aliens, or used as a substantial part of an
activity that encourages illegal aliens to come to or reside in the U.S. may
be seized by an immigration officer and is subject to forfeiture. The
forfeiture power covers any conveyances used within the U.S.
RICO —Citizen Recourse
Private persons and entities may initiate civil suits to obtain injunctions
and treble damages against enterprises that conspire to or actually violate
federal alien smuggling, harboring, or document fraud statutes, under the
Racketeer-Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO). The pattern of
racketeering activity is defined as commission of two or more of the listed
crimes. A RICO enterprise can be any individual legal entity, or a group of
individuals who are not a legal entity but are associated in fact, and can
include nonprofit associations.
Tax Crimes
Employers who aid or abet the preparation of false tax returns by failing to
pay income or Social Security taxes for illegal alien employees, or who
knowingly make payments using false names or Social Security numbers, are
subject to IRS criminal and civil sanctions. U.S. nationals who have
suffered intentional discrimination because of citizenship or national
origin by an employer with more than three employees may file a complaint
within 180 days of the discriminatory act with the Special Counsel for
Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices, U.S. Department of Justice.
In addition to the federal statutes summarized, state laws and local
ordinances controlling fair labor practices, workers compensation, zoning,
safe housing and rental property, nuisance, licensing, street vending, and
solicitations by contractors may also apply to activities that involve
illegal aliens.
Comment:
A comment and a published quote by Robert Gaffney, Attorney and County
Executive of Suffolk County, LI, NY:
The statutory foundation of United States immigration law has always been
the jurisdiction of the federal government, Congress and the federal courts.
The preeminent laws concerning the employment of illegal aliens are found in
the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. §~ 1101-1503), as amended by
the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 CIRCA).
The law states it is a crime to assist an illegal alien who lacks employment
authorization by referring him to an employer, or by acting as his or her
employer, or as an agent for an employer. 8 U.S.C.S. § 1324a(a)(1)(A) (Lexis
1997). Furthermore, it is unlawful to hire an individual for employment
without complying with the employment eligibility requirements for every
person hired. 8 U.S.C.S. § 1324a(a)(l)(B) (Lexis 1997). Moreover, conduct
tending substantially to facilitate illegal aliens remaining in the United
States illegally, where there is knowledge or a reckless disregard of an
illegal alien s unlawful status, is a crime, with escalating penalties,
encompassed within the provisions of 1324. 8 U.S.C.S. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(iii)
(Lexis 1997); United States v. Kim. 193 F-3d 567 (2d Cir. 1999), are
considered employees for purposes of immigration law.
MFS note: Proposed employment verification language, "The Fair and Legally
Eligible Employment Act (FLEE) is available here.
_______
MFS thanks Dr. Virginia D. Abernethy for providing this information.
See full text at the Legal Information Institute at <
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1324.html >.
Additional information is at the Department of Justice at <
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/73mcrm.htm#9-73.100
>.
http://www.mnforsustain.org/immigration_hiring_law_excerpts_from_us_code.htm
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 USC)
http://www.fourmilab.ch/uscode/8usc/www/contents.html
No wonder 500,000 illegal Aliens Marched
?? !!
"California has the three strikes and you go to prison for life law"
If being an illegal alien was changed to a being a felony it seems all
illegal aliens would already have two felony strikes against them,
Crossing the border illegally and being in the USA illegally.
The Three Strikes and You're Out Law
Address:
http://www.lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/3strikes.html
Keeping Track of
Republican Traitors in the Senate
WHG:
Thanks to Republicans Arlen Specter, Lindsey Graham, Sam
Brownback, and Mike DeWine the Senate Judiciary Committee passed
their amnesty for illegal aliens. They blew off Americans and
sided with the open-border Democrats. That created a majority
that allowed them to shape the bill to their liking. Come
election time, never forget it was these four republicans who
opened the flood gates.
http://wehategringos.com/whg/index.php?jal_no_js=true
http://wehategringos.com/whg/?p=67
How DJs Put 500,000 Marchers in Motion
By Teresa Watanabe and Hector Becerra, Times Staff Writers
March 28, 2006
He's one of the hottest Spanish-language radio personalities in the
nation. So when Los Angeles deejay Eddie Sotelo joined hands with
his radio rivals to urge listeners to turn out for a pro-immigrant
rally in downtown Los Angeles on Saturday, organizers hoped for a
big turnout.
But many said Monday that they were stunned by how many responded to
the call to march against federal legislation that would crack down
on undocumented immigrants and penalize those who assist them.
As a result, what was initially expected to draw fewer than 20,000
ballooned into a massive march that police estimated at 500,000 and said
was one of the largest demonstrations in Los Angeles' history. The march
topped a wave of protests drawing hundreds of thousands of participants
in cities around the nation, which organizers said influenced the U.S.
Senate Judiciary Committee's approval Monday of legislation that
includes legalization for undocumented immigrants.
Rally supporters, including immigrant-rights activists, churches, and
labor and community groups, agreed that the active advocacy of the
region's top Spanish-language radio personalities was critical in
drawing the enormous crowds, who marched more than 20 blocks along
Spring and Main streets and Broadway to City Hall, wearing white "peace"
shirts and waving American and Mexican flags.
The promoters included such on-air celebrities as KHJ's Humberto Luna,
KBUE's Ricardo "El Mandril" (The Baboon) Sanchez, Renan "El Cucuy" (The
Boogeyman) Almendarez Coello — whose often risque show has cast him as a
sort of Latino version of Howard Stern — and Sotelo, better known to
listeners as "El Piolin," or Tweety Bird. Coello's and Sotelo's morning
talk shows are among the highest-rated programs in any language in Los
Angeles.
"They were the key to getting so many people out," said Mike Garcia,
president of Local 1877 of the Service Employees International Union.
"If you listened to Spanish-language media, they were just pumping,
pumping, pumping this up."
For his part, Sotelo said he decided to promote the cause — by calling a
summit of his rival deejays to encourage them to do the same — after
rally organizers told him about the ramifications of the legislation
passed by the U.S. House of Representatives last December. The bill, by
Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-Wis.), would make undocumented
immigrants and those who assist them felons and erect a 700-mile fence
along the U.S.-Mexican border.
"I told God that if he gave me an opportunity as a radio announcer, I
was going to help my people," said Sotelo, who himself illegally crossed
the border in the trunk of a car in 1986 and gained legal status a
decade later. "I think we have to make sure the message went through to
Washington, to let them know we're not criminals."
The idea for the march first sprouted in February in the oldest church
in Los Angeles: Our Lady Queen of Angels, which has historically served
as a sanctuary for undocumented migrants.
The church near Olvera Street has become one of the city's organizing
hubs against the House bill, playing a leading role in promoting the
Roman Catholic Church's national "Justice for Immigrants" campaign.
Cardinal Roger M. Mahony last December appointed a committee to promote
the national campaign throughout the 5-million-member Los Angeles
Archdiocese.
The coalition of religious, community and civil rights activists meeting
at the church had begun planning several small-scale events: news
conferences, a petition drive and protest marches to Republican and
Democratic party offices.
But when two visitors joined the group in January, the vision suddenly
expanded.
Jesse Diaz, a doctoral candidate in sociology at UC Riverside, had
worked with day laborers in Pomona and organized marches against
Proposition 187, the 1994 state initiative that cut public benefits to
undocumented immigrants but was struck down in federal court. Javier
Rodriguez, a journalist, had also worked with immigrants and organized
black-Latino political alliances.
The two men called for something dramatic: a massive protest march.
"It was time," Diaz said. "The Sensenbrenner bill had passed. We have 10
[million] to 12 million undocumented immigrants in this country, but
their voice can't be heard at the ballot box. We felt a march would be a
way for them to speak out."
The coalition was initially wary, he said. The group had little money or
organization. At the time, none of the big labor or civil rights
organizations had yet signed on, such as the service employees union or
the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles. At the table,
aside from the Catholic priests and some Spanish-language journalists,
were such groups as the Central American Resource Center, Hermandad
Mexicana Latinoamericana, the Pomona Day Labor Center and the Southern
California Human Rights Network.
But Diaz and Rodriguez kept pushing. On March 2, the group held a news
conference at the church to announce the march and call for political
and Spanish-language media to get involved.
On March 13, the group got extensive coverage from KMEX-TV Channel 34,
including promos, leading up to a "media breakfast" the next day. Later
that day, Rodriguez and other leaders spoke to a producer on Sotelo's
program. The day after that, they were on "Piolin Por La Mañana" for
four hours, Rodriguez said.
"That was it, man!" Rodriguez said. "They gave us four hours and we went
at it. We talked about the need for people to come out."
The next day, Rodriguez and other leaders went on the air with Sanchez
of KBUE-FM (105.5) "Que Buena." During that show, Rodriguez said, he
proposed that the deejays join together for the cause.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-march28mar28,0,3303231.story?coll=la-home-headlines
================================================================================
WHEN ILLEGALS GO BERSERK WILL YOUR
STATE BE PREPARED?
By: Devvy
March 27, 2006
NewsWithViews.com
"We have an aging white America ... They are dying ...We have got to
eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the
worst, we have got to kill him." Jose Angel Gutierrez, professor, University
of Texas, Arlington and founder of the La Raza Unida political party
In my March 13, 2006, column I wrote about the 100,000 criminals (illegal
aliens, not immigrants) who brazenly marched through the streets of Chicago
without fear of being rounded up and deported. On March 17, 2006, an
estimated 25,000 illegals from Ireland marched boldly in the St. Patrick's
Day Parade in NY without fear of any enforcement of our immigration laws. I
told my friends at the time: this unchecked in-your-face, "we demand
respect" display by illegals will embolden them to demand they be given a
free pass and when that doesn't happen, it will reach the point of violence.
On March 24, 2006, hundreds of high school students in LA walked out of
their classrooms to protest the newest piece of completely unnecessary
immigration legislation by the incompetent fools in Congress. Within hours
15,000 criminals (illegals) were marching in Phoenix and roughly 10,000 in
Georgia. On March 25, 2006, waving their Mexican flags chanting the same
worn out "racist" garbage and demanding their "rights" 50,000 of these
criminals marched in Denver, thousands in North Carolina and here in
Sacramento. All because the House of Representatives has passed legislation
that would make it a felony to be in the U.S. illegally, impose new
penalties on employers who hire illegal immigrants and erect fences along
one-third of the U.S.-Mexican border. The counterfeit Senate is to begin
their bickering on March 28, 2006. Here's two short e-mails I recently
received from some illegal who no doubt chants racism because we the people
demand our immigration laws be enforced:
From: D******@aol.com. Date: 3/16/2006 7:06:47 PM
Message: "Hey you ignorants. Why dont you report YOURSELFS .lol. You white
people are the real illegals! When did you have a passport to come into my
ancestors land
MP3