T he U.S. has ordered an additional carrier along with other ships, supplies and 3000 additional men to the Gulf ostensibly to take out Saddam's capability for making weapons of mass destruction. What is not being revealed is the base self-interest underlying these new events.
President Clinton this week laid out the long and progressive process in dealing with Saddam Hussein and Iraq. He also laboriously laid a groundwork for the justification for the reprisals that he and Mr. Cohen deem necessary to bring Iraq into compliance to the wishes of his administration. President Clinton made one poignant observation which told the whole story behind the scenes. That observation was that Saddam used chemical weapons against his own people. The great revelation and deceit behind the presidential motives stands out when it is realized that no mention was made of the U.S. chemical weapons used by Mr. Clinton in the eradication of the Branch Davidian church in this country. Mr. Clinton professes to be a Christian and it would be no stretch of the imagination to use the same argument he uses against Iraq on him. He used chemical weapons against his own people (Christians). I suppose Mr. Clinton may not acknowledge the Davidians as Christians. He would use the term "cult" and he thinks that would justify using chemical weapons against these American citizens. All things being equal I think it is fair to say that many others would not consider President Clinton a Christian since he seems to revel in the breaking of the Commandments which Christians keep. It would be quite rational to say that our own president is the greatest cult leader and terrorist this world has at the moment.
I use that word "terrorist" respectfully. I use the definition of terrorist that the President of the United States uses himself. When a foreign power sends two of its nationals to America to blow up a building, the President of the United Sates calls them terrorists. Would it not stand to reason that if 32,000 of our nationals were sent to Iraq to blow up some of their buildings, they could rightly be considered terrorists? I think that stands to reason. At The WINDS we like to use words precisely and as to their meaning. Even Webster's says that "a terrorist is someone who terrorizes or frightens others." If Iraqis are attacked, would it not stand to reason that some of them will be terrorized or frightened? If a terrorist brought a missile to U.S. shores and shot the missile at one of our aircraft, would not the president state that it was a terrorist act perpetrated by a despicable and low person? So, considering these realities, it stands to reason if some of our nationals take some missiles over to Iraq and blow up some of their aircraft, buildings, children, men and women, it would reasonably be considered a terrorist act. Terrorist acts are considered illegal which is the case with our own president's actions. No state of war has been declared. It is terrorism simple and true. Instead of two or three terrorists, however, we have surrounded Iraq with 32,000 terrorists--most of them sent over on pirate ships. More on pirate ships later.
These things being said, they are only the surface things concerning justifications, hypocrisies and outright lies being told to cover more sinister purposes. American terrorist ships are not being sent to Iraq because of some gas canisters Saddam might be hiding in his bathroom. The international outrage at Saddam's "dictatorship" is staged for only one reason, control and MONEY!
International finance wants the entire earth in its pocket. Saddam is somewhat of a rogue figure and independent. He does not bow the knee to Western interests and world finance. That is, Saddam does what Saddam wants to do. This outrages those who control world politics and money. It is fitting to send the USS Enterprise to the Gulf. According to Webster, enterprise means: "a company organized for commercial purposes." This western company is setting out to attack Saddam's eastern company. It is his form of dictatorship which is opposed to our form of dictatorship. The international cabal will use this pawn to further its own fortunes.
The Protocols explain this: "To sum up our system of keeping the governments of the nations...in check, we shall show our strength to one of them by terrorist attempts and to all, if we allow the possibility of a general rising against us, we shall respond with the guns of America...." #7
The recent upheaval in the Balkans was a handy launch pad for American and Western money to begin setting up interests in the former Soviet territories. Even before the blood dried, Ron Brown had a plane load of business interests to survey the territory and begin setting up the financial kingdom. Ron Brown made the mistake of getting into a little trouble and stating he would take others with him if he was prosecuted. Ron Brown disappeared from the scene of action, but the business interests did not.
The Middle East is highly individualized and dominated by religious and other territorial interests. The world finance apparatus has been highly successful in most Eastern ventures, such as splitting off Kuwait from Iraq and generally controlling the oil fields, but it has not been able to dominate the soul of the nations there. They are not so prone to allowing the sex trade, abortion, homosexuality and secular interests generally into their culture that are so prevalent in the decadent west.
One thing certain about the New World Order is that everyone must play the game. No one will be allowed to think independently. Saddam has turned out to be a willing player. The cabal delights in a man who resists so valiantly since he can be used for an example to anyone else in the world who dares not allow American and other international enterprises to control their society.
Russia, who usually protests American piracy in regards to Iraq, this time is keeping silent on the issue. Russia needs money and Russia is also right where world powers want them -- on their knees and emasculated. While the IMF and World Bank pose as saviors of the world financial difficulties, they are instead the creators of them. This is graphically portrayed in the most recent moves against Iraq. American guns are being used to bring Mideastern culture under western control. Again the The Protocolsrefer to this process:
We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war. The principal factor of success in the political is the secrecy of its undertakings: the word [our lie] should not agree with the deeds of the diplomat.
We must compel the governments of the nations to take action in the direction favored by our widely conceived plan, already approaching the desired consummation, by what we shall represent as public opinion, secretly promoted by us through the means of that so-called "Great Power" - THE PRESS, WHICH, WITH A FEW EXCEPTIONS THAT MAY BE DISREGARDED, IS ALREADY ENTIRELY IN OUR HANDS. #7
While it may be argued that this is not a bad thing to have everyone look just like us, or some may argue for a one-world government, this is largely a matter of subjective opinion. What may be understood by all, however, is that when something is done in the dark, it is wrong and deceitful. Presidential lies will never be justified by the president's desire for a one-world order. When children are starved to force compliance of their nation, we may well see the barbarity of this new world kingdom. All along it has been the real intention of the financial world kingdom to never lift the sanctions on Iraq until Saddam and every other Eastern power bows low before the feet of world conquerors and becomes emasculated of its sovereignty. It can be seen that this assault has nothing to do with anthrax. Anthrax is only a ploy to get those stupid Americans who will, to pull the trigger of the gun that their organizers place within their hands.
The United States is revealing the truth about its terrorists leaders. This act against Iraq, if carried out, is illegal. It is unilateral. It is without U.N. authorization. It is simply a terrorist act committed by a large and financially powerful nation ruled by a dictator dedicated to his self-interests. It is also an act carried out while there is no threat being made by Iraq on America. The fear being promoted on this country is that Iraq could conceivably do this-or-that which might hurt us some day. Please tell me, is not this something that could be said about any nation on earth? Since they are not a real threat to the U.S., why all the saber rattling? Because, they are a threat to proposed, future U.S. financial interests in the region. This is the eye-opener which our Terrorist in Chief and his lieutenant Cohen will not openly acknowledge.
The Associated Press reported that "American and British threats of a military strike are 'a reckless act,' Iraq's foreign minister said, calling for a political solution to the dispute over U.N. weapons inspections. The minister, Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, said in an interview late Monday on Qatari television that military action would 'lead to destabilizing the region.' He called on the U.N. Security Council to respond to Iraq's demand that a review of Iraq's compliance with U.N. resolutions that ended the 1991 Persian Gulf War lead to the lifting of punishing sanctions. Al-Sahhaf said the Security Council should be 'given a genuine opportunity -- free from all Anglo-Saxon pressures.'
Sometimes the expressed naiveté of the Iraqis and world governments is beyond one's comprehension. Iraq's foreign minister tells the rattlesnake that if it bites him, he will get sick. "Destabilization" is exactly what western powers want. That is what the bombing is about. If Iraq can be sufficiently destabilized, other forces within Iraq who have already bowed the knee can be used to bring revolution to the country. Once revolution is in progress, other Ron Browns can quickly go in and set up a western style financial infrastructure and take over the entire Middle Eastern commerce, while other Middle Eastern nations, afraid of what they saw happen to Iraq, would quickly submit to the world beast now showing its fangs. This has always been the purpose for creating a Saddam in that region.
A somewhat prophetic song was written by Jackson Browne in 1985 which seems to reveal the whole argument seen by few drunken souls these days. It is entitled: "Lives in the Balance." Following are a few lines from that song:
You might ask what it takes to remember
When you know that you've seen it before
Where a government lies to a people
And a country is drifting to war
And there's a shadow on the faces
Of the men who send the guns
To the wars that are fought in places
Where their business interest runs
They sell us the president the same way
They sell us our clothes and our cars
They sell us everything from youth to religion
The same time they sell us our wars
I want to know who the men in the shadows are
I want to hear somebody asking them why
They can be counted on to tell us who
our enemies are
But they're never the ones to fight or to die
While most Americans wave flags and celebrate Veteran's Day, few men see the nature of their slavery. Few men detect the lies and whitewash that continue men in their round of slavish duties.
In recent years national leaders have beaten the drums of small government and for a reduction in welfare roles etc., etc., etc. National leaders have cut benefits and National Park allowances. Some gate fees in National Parks such as in Yellowstone have been doubled, even for those who just drive through the park on a state highway without ever getting our of their car. Cost of government is being drastically reduced. That sounds good, but we are not told the rest of the story. What is not said, and what is not given, is the true reason for the hype. Associated Press reported last week that our taxes have increased since they were instituted. Our taxes are the highest in history and they continue to rise. What is not told the cattle is where all the money has gone. Why is it we can cut our expenses, reduce benefits, and our taxes continue to slide up? Why all the hype about a tax cut, but virtually nothing is mentioned about all the tax increases.
A personal case in point is this. My own personal property taxes have risen 20% a year for the past five years. We have not even painted our old place. We have built nothing additional. No tax man has come by. Each year they simply increase 20%. I spoke with one of our county commissioners a while back and he was fretting about Federal pressure on the county and the great expenses the Federal government was laying on the county. I said, why not just do what we want? We are not a Federal county. The commissioner then stated, "if we do not obey, the Federal government will sue us and wipe us out."
There are other increases to costs in taxation that are not as obvious. Our fuel taxes slide up and it seems like a gas price increase. Where has all the money gone while expenditures decrease? Why is it gas taxes increase and so do the potholes in the roads at the same time? Are not gas taxes supposed to fix the roads?
The answer is in money and profits. Huge profits are made in governmental financial trading. Loans are made to foreign countries. There are giant payoffs on these loans. When a country or countries default, the taxpayers bail them out. Who do we bail out? The money lenders, not the countries. This is where our billions contributed to the IMF go. Some of our readers may remember the 200 billion bailout of the nation's banks in our own country. Taxpayers paid for that. It is highly profitable for some individuals to make bad loans or any other kind of loan that will eventually be paid by taxpayers. This is why the citizens have increased taxes while the services decrease. The money is going to those who make money off such schemes. The money just didn't disappear. Why is it that taxpayer money is used to bail out private industry? The subtlety of using money from the earnings of the private citizen for corporate gain is robbery. The nation's citizens are being robbed legally and no one can see it. This is piracy.
In the news most recently we have heard about the huge thirty billion plus package being designed for Brazil to help the country out. Our president pictures this as a great stabilizing measure. Okay, little cows let us sit down and add one plus one. If your household was in serious trouble and you were not able to make your monthly payments, do you suppose a government loan of $100,000 would help you out? It would until your payment came due. These loans are not gifts. Someone will pay them and it is always paid by somebody's taxpayer. When a nation is sufficiently strapped, the citizens are forced into labor to pay off these huge international debts. The buzz words for that are "imposing austerity measures." This accomplishes two things. It brings every able-bodied person into forced labor in one of these slave labor camps and it causes the borrowing government to yield to the demands of the lender. President Clinton would say these slave labor factories are places for employment opportunities. I can hear President Bush now, "Jobs, jobs, jobs." Working as a clerk in Wal-Mart may be a job, but it is not one in which one can become financially independent. In other nations those jobs are often little other than slave labor. The bankers sell loans to governments around the world which are created out of thin air. The nations involved now must learn the science of taxation in order to pay off those loans. Taxation forces the here-to-fore happy, free indigenous people off the land and into the slave factories or some other enterprise to earn money so that taxes on their lands might be paid. All citizens are in control and under the direct supervision of the IMF through their respective governments.
Again the Protocols: "We must create ferments, discords and hostility. Therein we gain the double advantage. In the first place we keep in check all countries, for they will know that we have the power whenever we like to create disorders or to restore order. All these countries are accustomed to see in us an indispensable force of coercion. In the second place, by our intrigues we shall tangle up all the threads which we have stretched into the cabinets of all States by means of the political, by economic treaties, or loan obligations. In order to succeed in this we must use great cunning and penetration during negotiations and agreements, but, as regards what is called the "official language," [legal jargon] we shall keep to the opposite tactics and assume the mask of honesty and compliancy. In this way the peoples and governments of the nations, whom we have taught to look only at the outside whatever we present to their notice, will still continue to accept us as the benefactors and saviors of the human race." #7
Let's look at things as they are for a change. These terrorist ships now heading to the Gulf are pirate ships. They are U.S. pirate ships. Webster says pirate means, "any plunderer or predator." A pirate ship is one used by anyone like this.
The reason so many of our countrymen do not see what is happening today is because they do not understand the nature of wealth. Wealth comes only from the backs of people. The people are the supporters of the debt which creates the wealth for those who make policy in the highest ranks of international manipulation. While most Americans today wonder how black slavery could ever have been practiced, they fail to look around and see that it has not gone away. Today's slaves are Mexicans, Chinese and others. These folks work for a few dollars a day keeping products flowing. Governments get taxes out of the sale of products. All of this is based on a world of debt. That debt produces huge stores of wealth for a small segment of society. That wealth is controlled by a still smaller force of the international cabal. One need not have any money to rule the world. All he needs to do is control it. This occurs through the auspices of international banking and the media. Yes, your newspapers and nightly news place before you the picture which will motivate you to action on behalf of their interests. One such example of the work of these pirates is "Let's Get Saddam."
Our current form of world finance would collapse if all people got paid according to their labor. It has been and is based on debt and the slave trade. These days the slave trade is called "free trade" or freedom of some other sort. Our president and his pirate crew are well aware of how international finance works. The reason he is not out of office is that his personal friends in high places want him where he is for the moment. The media will not vilify him but, instead, portrays a neatly balanced propaganda blitz which allow us to see the man without actually doing anything about him. If the press is against a man, he would be out in days. When the President was in the middle of his sex scandal, Barbara Walters sent him a message through one of her interviews. She said, "tell the President we are with him." America IS NOT run from the ballot box. That is a hoax few comprehend. America is run by forces that few know anything about. Elected officials have nothing to do with the running of world affairs other than that they are a few pretty faces who do what they are told or else. America has been truly emasculated and to heap insult onto insult it is American guns being used for the low purposes of international deceit and manipulation. Those guns are paid for by U.S. taxpayers and the trigger is pulled by U.S. citizens. The work of the international cabal is simply to tell us what to do. We pay for it and we do it. And we talk about cult leaders.
The questions are often asked me, "how do you know these things?" To truly document all of this would take volumes, and volumes have been written. Suffice it to say, we simply point you to the obvious hypocrisy. We look at things anyone can see. Listen to the buzz words that come through the media in high places. They often include, "protecting American interests." Haven't you heard that one? What are the American interests? MONEY INTERESTS. We send pirate ships when our money is threatened. I often consider Clinton's terrorist raid on the Sudan aspirin factory as only a ploy to garner business for cabal pharmaceuticals. This pharmaceutical plant produced most of the drugs for Sudan. Now they must get their drugs elsewhere. Nothing ever linked this factory to any international terrorist and no poison chemicals were found to substantiate our president's assertions. No, I have no proof for the assessment that it was done for greed, but I am used to watching the snake work and it seems the only reason an intelligent man would bomb that plant is that it was in competition to outside interests and Sudan needed to be punished for not bowing the knee. If that is not the case, we are dealing with idiots running government. While that may be an appropriate charge, I suspect these men are not idiots. Just somewhat sinister and self-serving.
National sovereignty is not important to political leaders in high places these days. As with Manuel Noriega, we will march right in and arrest their president if he is not sufficiently obedient to our national interests. Could you imagine anyone on earth getting away with that if they tried it in this country? Yes, it may be that some would like to see the president hauled off to court in some foreign country, but they would never get away with it. If Saddam had Clinton kidnapped for trial in Iraq, most of our citizens would think that would be different than the situation with Noriega. It would not be.
One recent event which was almost funny it was so obvious, was last week's segment on 60 Minutes exposing the poisoning of the land near and around the Panama Canal. The U.S. has much unexploded "weapons of mass destruction" ordnance all over the area. There are unexploded chemical and other ordnance which poses a threat to Panamanians. That is the story. 60 Minutes proposes that the U.S. should go in and clean up its mess. Well, yes, we should. What was not revealed to the listener was why U.S. government tax money is being sought for cleanup. It sounds right, but the motivations are smoked. Inadvertently, 60 Minutes revealed that a Panamian island which was used for testing this ordnance was purchased by wealthy investors for a resort. The wealthy interests get relatively cheap land because it is poisoned. That land was once held by the U.S. Now, U.S. tax money can be used to the tune of many millions of dollars to get the island presentable for the first wealthy customers. Who better to beat the drums than 60 Minutes--the agency for advertising the needs of all imperial interests?
There is another aside here. Recently, I got an e-mail from one of our readers in Panama. He was not making a violent protest, but simply an observation. When the U.S. troops invaded Panama, they killed an estimated 4,000 Panamanians, most of whom were poor and powerless. What is not reported is that most of those Panamanians lived in somewhat Third World conditions. When the Americans attacked, they destroyed the poor and their neighborhood. This Panamanian noticed how those neighborhoods were destroyed, the people killed, and how luxury condominiums replaced them. No better way to clean up a neighborhood than have America invade and wipe everyone out. Strangely, the invasion did not touch the wealthy areas of Panama. This was the report to me from a resident there.
We hear much about the U.N. and its humanitarian goals. Again, this smoke is put out to garner support and acquiescence. The U.N. is simply about wealth. The world's rich and powerful behind the media hype know what they are doing and where they are going. The human heart's lust for power and money is little realized with all of the smiling Santas and Easter bunnies, shopping malls and toys. Our flags and our holidays mask the real and sinister forces who send pirate ships off to terrorize a foreign land. And the cattle being manipulated are too sleepy to care.
For a long time the world has been run this way. It is not new for the rich and powerful behind the scenes to take away the rights of the weak and powerless for their own personal gains. Men have always had other men over them. What is necessary to reveal is that it is still that way. All of the talk of freedom of religion and freedom of conscience is a lie. It does not exist. If I were to say to the property tax officials that it was against my conscience to pay property taxes since they use the money for public education, which wastes the lives of little children and eventually turns them into little slaves, the tax collector would smile while stealing my home to sell to the nearest person who would pay their extortion fee. This may sound somewhat cynical, but it is simply true. Webster's says extortion means: "the crime of obtaining money or some other thing of value by the abuse of one's office or authority." When the tax collector threatens to take the home of someone who cannot conscientiously pay him, that IS extortion and that IS NOT freedom of conscience.
The truth of our national system, especially these days, is that it is built on a lie. Our president is a perfect and spotless example of how this system works. It manipulates truth and law for its own personal advantage. When the president speaks of his reasons for attacking Saddam any listener can see the flaws. Saddam is no threat to our country. The president knows that. The president says he might be a threat at some future time. What justification is that for starving to death 60,000 of his children every year and raining terrorist bombs on the country? The Washington Times reported today that China is set to conduct the first flight test next month of a new mobile intercontinental ballistic missile that can reach the western United States. Why is it that Saddam is targeted but China is not since China is truly in a position to do damage to U.S. interests? It is because the Chinese are now obedient slaves to the financial cabal and Iraq is not. That is all.
Laws are used to keep the population on their machines. Laws are not followed by those in the darkened rooms of world control. They are never followed by the Pharisees. I can imagine what a conversation about this with the president would sound like:
THE WINDS: Mr. President, are you part of the new world order conspiracy?
PRESIDENT: How do you define "part?"
THE WINDS: Any part. You know, you do things for pecuniary interests.
PRESIDENT: Define pecuniary.
THE WINDS: Webster's says pecuniary is of or pertaining to money. Consisting of or given or exacted in money or monetary payments: pecuniary tributes.
PRESIDENT: I pay my taxes. Every American should pay his taxes.
THE WINDS: No, sir, you don't understand. I am speaking of a conspiracy of international interests which have us send ships to foreign shores to protect our pecuniary interests. Does that happen?
PRESIDENT: People around the world need to be free. They should be able to get a job and feed their family. Everyone should have health care.
THE WINDS: Sorry, you don't seem to understand. That is not our question. Our question is, are you manipulating people around the world for the interests of money? Are these stories you tell on the T.V. about Saddam's weapons of mass destruction used to form public opinion in favor of that?
PRESIDENT: Define "used."
THE WINDS: Thank you, Mr. President, I don't think we have any more questions.
PRESIDENT: My pleasure.
...With lies ye have made the heart of the righteous sad, whom I have not made sad; and strengthened the hands of the wicked, that he should not return from his wicked way.... Eze 13:22.
"And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities. Reward her even as she rewarded you, and double unto her double according to her works: in the cup which she hath filled fill to her double. How much she hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously, so much torment and sorrow give her: for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow. Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her." (Revelation 18:4-8, KJV).
Disclaimer: APFN is not responsible for the accuracy of
material on 'The Winds'
and does not necessarily endorse the views expressed within their web pages.
This page is in the public domain.