Is Your Mind At Fahrenheit -459

bub.gif (15162 bytes)

Subject:  Fahrenheit -459
Date:  Sun, 22 Jul 2001 16:58:17 -0400
From:  Nicole Terry
To:  (Recipient list suppressed)

Is Your Mind At Fahrenheit -459

By: Nicole Terry  

Insane delusion. An “insane delusion” is a conception of a disordered mind which imagines facts to exist of which there is no evidence and belief in which is adhered to against all evidence and argument to contrary, and which cannot be accounted for on any reasonable hypothesis.  In re Nigro’s Estate, 243 Cal. App.2d 152, 52   Cal.Rptr. 128, 133.

In American society there is a developed hierarchy in which certain people are given power and authority over others. The relationship between authority figures and subordinates is especially espoused in most of the Christian churches in America. Most clergy refer to Romans chapter 13 to justify obedience to authority. This obedience has caused some of the most astounding atrocities to be inflicted on mankind. The Clergy themselves are looked upon as authority figures  in that they declare themselves as a authority on a Deity's will. Most American Christians justify the atrocities that they commit and allow to be committed to be the will of their God. The Christian God is in reality the International Monetary Fund. The clergy do perform the will of the International Monetary Fund in that they perform incantations, dress in a chancery robe, collect debt instruments and outright lie to the people telling them that there is a God in heaven watching over them. The entire basis of Christianity is as follows: There is a God, who tortured his only son, because of the disobedience of his creation. The Clergy also have the people act out cannibalism They use bread which symbolizes the body of Jesus and juice or wine that symbolizes the blood of Jesus, then they eat and drink . Not only do the Christians praise the death of a man ( human sacrifice ), They also pretend to ingest him.

Almost all churches are corporations. Corporations are artificial persons created by the Government. A Corporation is bound by it’s Articles of Incorporation. In the case of Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat 626, Chief Justice Marshall describes a corporation to be “ artificial, invisible, intangible, and existing only in the contemplation of Law”

All corporations of what ever kind, are molded and controlled, both as to what they may do and the manner in which they may do it, by their charters or acts of incorporation, which to them are the laws of their being, which they can neither dispense with nor alter. “The charter of the corporation and the purpose for which it is organized must be ascertained by reference to the terms of its charter, and the right of the corporation to its exemption must be determined likewise by the powers given in its charter.” Harrison v. Barker Annuity Fund; 90 F.2d 286.

A corporations supreme law is its charter. “The nature of the corporation, as well as its purposes and objects, must be determined from its charter or articles of association, and cannot be shown by extrinsic evidence. 11 C.J. Char 9 If a corporation has a controversy with its creator (Government) the resolution to the controversy would first require going back to its corporate charter. If the controversy were upon a moral argument, the corporation could not use the (Bible Talmud etc.) as extrinsic evidence. “The corporation (Church) is a creature of the State....Its rights to act as a corporation are only preserved to it so long as it obeys the laws of its creation. Hale v. Hinkel, 201 U.S. 74. As stated by Roscoe Egger, former IRS Commissioner “The IRS, for many years has had the right to examine church records, because churches have been collecting taxes for many years for the government. The churches therefore hold in trust that which belongs to the government. We have the right to examine church records to see if the churches are handling government funds properly.

In order to receive not-for-profit status a church (corporation) must be approved by the IRS which is an agency of the IMF which is an Agency of the UN.  A Church must be UN approved because, the actual owner of the corporation (church) is the UN. See: Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., 22 U.S.C.A. 284, 285, 286, 287, 288   26 U.S.C. 501 C/3 Definition of International Monetary Fund in Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. IRS Publication 1828 (9-94) Cat. # 21096G

These propositions  have been taken from IRS Service Publication 1828 (9-94) Cat. # 21096G, Tax Guide for Churches, Other Religious Organizations, and 501-C3 Not for Profit Religious Organizations, Draft July 26, 1994.
1. A Church must have ordained ministers.
2. A Church must be neutral on political issues.
3. A Pastor must answer to the IRS as to the activities of the church.
4. The IRS must be privy to all financial transactions of the church.
5. The Pastor must supply names of all donors - make books, records available.
6. The Church can only use IRS approved fundraising methods.
7. The Church may  not support legislation saying children belong to parents rather than the state.
8. A Church can not oppose the public school system.

 The Christians gave a new meaning to the words heaven and hell in order to solidify the churches' and governments control over the minds of the people. The church did not bring heaven and hell into existence, they were already there as old English words: “heofon” as the sky and residence of the gods; hell as a place of life after death. Christianity gave a new meaning to both words. Hell became a place of torment, inhabited by devils, oathbreakers, and other condemned souls. And it was now understood that a good man might live forever in heaven. This shift of emphasis was done in order to put more wallop into an oath and gave a literate clergyman the ability to threaten hell-fire and damnation for those who were in disagreement with the church. This god of Christianity, which is a false god, is used to heap guilt upon people in order to not only control their minds, but their pocket books. The clergymen used to formulate deeds and wills so that when a man passed away, his possessions would be turned over to the church, instead of his family. This is why hell in the modern sense was created. If a man did not leave his possessions to the church he would face eternal damnation. As a matter of fact anyone who even questioned the church would face eternal damnation.

 A tenth-century deed for example, recites the witnesses to the delivery of possession, and adds:      “ And Archbishop Wulfhelm and all the bishops and abbots who were there assembled excommunicated from Christ and from all the fellowship of Christ and from the whole of Christendom anyone who should ever undo this grant or reduce this estate in pasture or in boundary. He shall be cut off and hurled into the abyss of hell for ever without end. And the people who stood by said "So be it, Amen, Amen." Robertson, ed., Anglo-Saxon Charters 44-45 (2nd ed. 1956)
In other words, "Confuse our extortion and you'll go to hell."

“And I entreat the community [i.e., the Church] for the love of God, that the man to whom the community grants the use of the estate carry out the same arrangements with regard to a feast at my anniversary, as my heirs shall have appointed it, and so obtain the divine reward for my soul.”  Robertson, ed., Anglo-Saxon Charters 11 (2nd ed. 1956)

In other words,"If you do not give us your possessions you'll lose your soul."

The Creation of a Strong Delusion and the Making of a False Major Premise

This god of Christianity is not the Creator of the Universe, but a color of a god. All Bibles known or that I have ever read that have been translated into English are false translations. A prerequisite to learning the Truth, at the very least, is to read, compose and contemplate in Latin, Hebrew and Greek in order to find the truth about our existence and duties as brain-washed slaves. Most people are no longer slaves. They are parrots. No, I’m wrong they are robots.
What is taking place now and has been for thousands of years is the infusion of superstitions into the minds of the people by the clergyman so that the clergymen may have the knowledge of origin (natural law) to themselves. He who has enlightenment, renders precisely; and he who renders precisely, defines his language.

A fine example of this is the word "God" used in the Old Testament. This is not a proper translation but an elegant representation of how far the clergy of the earth will go to hide the truth. The word used in the Hebrew text is “elohiym”, “el-o-heem” which is defined as gods in the ordinary sense. Not a god but gods. I request you to look it up yourself. This is only the commencement of the deception placed into the minds of men by the clergy.

Furthermore, if one examines the King James Bible with the original Greek and Hebrew texts, one will find that over (75) seventy-five percent of the words have been mistranslated. This was performed deliberately to deceive the populace into worshipping a false god in order to control their productivity and minds.
Christianity is based on superstition. Please examine the definitions below.

Superstition. A belief or system of beliefs by which religious veneration or regard is shown toward objects which deserve none; or the assignment of such a degree or such a kind of veneration or regard toward an object, as such object, though worthy of some reverence, does not deserve; a faith or article of faith based on insufficient evidence, or no evidence at all; belief in and reverence of things which are not proper objects of worship; especially, the worship of false gods through fear; pagan doctrines and rites. --Webster.

Superstitious. Over scrupulous and ridged in religious observances; addicted to superstition; full of idle fancies and scruples in regard to religion or supernatural events.--Webster

Furthermore, to place a Deity into a religion would be the ultimate blasphemy. The word religion is from the Latin word religare, which means to bind or collect, but even more specifically a collection of religious formulas. Now the word formula is from the Latin word forma which, means to mold or shape. So in order to have a religion one must first set-up a false (limited) god and to mold it to fit one's needs and then use threats against the people to bring the god to life in their minds.

If you recognize, clergy always use syllogisms to promote themselves, but they use a false major premise so that the conclusion itself is false. Now this false conclusion is used to control or in other words, bind and collect.  Now we will take this a degree beyond and define witchcraft. Witchcraft is sorcery, irresistible influence and fascination.

Now sorcery is incantations. Incantations are the using of certain formulas of words and formulas in ceremonies (rituals) for the purpose of raising spirits. Such as baptizing in water, the persecution of those who do not supervene the clergymen; the laying of hands to heal; while canting to the god which they have conjured up in the minds of their followers of which gives people a false "emotional" sense of security in other words, causes fascination. Now fascination is the act of bewitching or enchanting; a powerful or irresistible influence on the affections or passions; a charm; a spell. This is when the people will usually pass out or go into a state of convulsions. This happens all of the time on Religious television programs. I am sure most of you are familiar with the people who go into a seizure when a clergymen prays for someone, then touches them. This is made possible due to the fascinations, which have been infused into the minds of the people. These people are suffering from an intense, psychotic breakdown. Many actually see apparitions which is the result from a false major premise.

Now a clergy will inform you that witchcraft is WICCA or any other group that disagrees with their doctrine. WICCA is just another religion heaped upon the people. This is performed because, in fact (s)he is the one practicing witchcraft. Witchcraft is not an object you can see with your biological eyes but, witchcraft is the act of placing falsehoods into people's minds (souls) to control them. In medical terms it is what is called insanity. Insanity is believing something without evidence, in other words being delusional or superstitious.

This so-called singular GOD written about in the Bible is a fabrication. The GOD of the purported Bible was created by the New World Order a long time ago. The New World Order, which is actually the Old World Order, is sitting back laughing at all of the brain-washed people that are waiting for Jesus to return. I hate to be the one to burst your bubble, but Jesus is not returning. Thanks to the "Powers that Be" people have been brain-washed to the point that they now pray to and worship a dead man. WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!!!!! I have everything that you have read in this release heavily documented.

Religion orders people to murder or enslave anyone who does not agree with its doctrine. Does not the Talmud order to rape and murder the Goy?  Did not the Holy Bible order the murder of millions of people? Does not the Koran order the murder of Infidels? The purpose of religion is to indoctrinate, command and manipulate people and to turn them against one another. Religion imprints on one's mind that if he does not obey, he is sentenced to eternal damnation. It is the ultimate in mind control. People cannot be controlled without terror being placed into their minds and there must be an enemy. That is why there is more than one Religion.

Here are a few examples of the Talmud (Soncino Edition) and the Bible (King James Edition). What you are about to read is so vile that you probably won’t believe it. Make sure you verify it for yourself. First the Talmud. The Talmud  condones and promotes pedophilia, necrophilia, bestiality and the comsumption of excrement from dogs. Please verify!

SANHEDRIN, 55-b-55a: “What is meant by this? - Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samual said: pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that (2) What is the basis of their dispute?- Rab maintains that he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty (in that respect) (3). But Samuel maintains: Scriptures writes, (And thou shalt not lie with mankind) as with the lying with a woman (4). It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day;  (55a) (he) who commits bestiality, whether naturally or unnaturally: or a woman who causes herself to be beastally abused, whether naturally or unnaturally, is liable to punishment (5).”

(footnotes) “(1) The reference is to the passive subject of sodomy. As stated in supra 54a, guilt is incurred by the active participant even if the former is a minor; i.e.., less than thirteen years old. Now, however, it is stated that within this age a distinction is drawn.
(2) Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred. Samuel makes the minimum three.
(3) At nine years a male attains sexual matureness.
(4) Lev XVIII, 22
(5) Rashi reads (“xxx”) (Hebrew characters, Ed.) Instead of (“zzz”) (Hebrew characters, Ed.) In our printed texts. A male aged nine years and a day, who commits etc. There are thus three distinct clauses in this Baraitha. The first-a male aged nine years and a day-refers to the passive subject of pederasty, the punishment being incurred by the adult offender. This must be its meaning: because firstly, the active offender is never explicitly designated as a male, it being understood, just as the Bible states, the shalt not lie with mankind, where only the sex of the passive participant is mentioned; and secondly, if the age reference is to the active party, the guilt being incurred by the passive adult party, why single out pederasty: in all crimes of incest, the passive adult does not incur guilt unless the other party is at least nine years and a day? Hence the Baraitha supports Rabos contention that nine years (and a day) is the minimum age of tthe passive partner for the adult to be liable.”

SANHEDRIN, 55b:  “A maiden three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husbands brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; (if a niddah) she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has laid upon (a person afflicted with gonorrhea).”

(2) His wife derives no pleasure from this, and hence there is no cleaving.
(3) A variant reading of this passage is: Is there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen. Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew.
(4)By taking the two in conjunction, the latter as illustrating the former, we learn that the guilt of violating the injunction to his wife but not to his neighbors wife is incurred only for natural but not for unnatural intercourse.

KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. “Rabba said, It means (5) this: When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (6), it is as if one puts the finger in the eye (7), but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman, he makes her as a girl who is injured by a piece of wood.” (footnotes)
(5) Lit., says.
(6) Lit., here, that is, less than three years old.
(7) Tears come to the eyes again and again, so does virginity come back to to the little girl under three years.

KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. “Rab judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown up woman makes her(as though she were) injured by a piece of wood (1). Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood.”
(1) Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood.”

YEBAMOTH, 55b. “Raba said; for what purpose did the All Merciful write carnally in connection with the designated bondmaid (9), a married woman (10 and a sotah (11) ? That in connection with the designated bondmaid (is required) as has just been explained (12). That in connection with a married woman excludes intercourse with a relaxed membrum (13). This is a satisfactory interpretation in accordance with the view of him who maintains that if one cohabited with forbidden relatives with relaxed membrum he is exonerated (14); what, however, can be said, according to him who maintains (that for such an act one is) guilty? The exclusion is rather  that of intercourse with a dead woman (15). Since it might have been assumed that, as (a wife), even after her death, is described as his kin (16), one should be guilty for (intercourse with) her (as for that) with a married woman, hence we are taught (that one is exonerated).
(9) lev. XIX,20
(10) Ibid. XVIII, 20
(11) Num. V, 13.
(12) Supra 55a.
(13) Since no fertilization can possibly occur.
(14) Shebu., 18a, Sanh. 55a.
(15)Even though she dies as a married woman.
(16)In Lev. XXI, 2. Where the text enumerates the dead relatives for whom a priest may defile himself. As was explained, supra 22b, his kin refers to ones wife.” (Emphasis in Soncino Edition original, Ed.)

YEBAMOTH, 63a. “R. Eleazar further stated: What is meant by the Scripture text, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh (5)? This teaches that Adam had intercourse with every beast and animal but found no satisfaction until he cohabited with Eve.
 Gen. II, 23. Emphasis on This is now.”  (emphasis appears in original soncina Edition, Ed.)

YEBAMOTH, 59b.  “When  R.Dimi came (8) he related: It once happened at Haitalu (9)  that while a young woman was sweeping the floor (10) a village dog (11) covered her from the rear (12) and Rabbi permitted her to marry a priest. Samuel said: Even a High Priest.
(8)From Palistine to Babylon>
(9) (Babylonian form for Aitulu, modern Aiterun N.W. Of Kadesh, v. S. Klein, Beitrage, P. 47)
(10) Lit., house.
(11) Or big hunting dog (Rashi), ferocious dog (Jast.), small wild dog (Aruk)
(12) A case of unnatural intercourse.

This one I beg you to look up for yourself, this is hard to believe but Gitten 69 explains. To heal the disease of pleurisy (“catarrh”) a Jew should “take the excrement of a white dog and knead it with balsam, but if he can possibly avoid it he should not eat the dog’s excrement as it loosens the limbs.”

Now the Bible condones and promotes slavery,  genocide, plunder, sexual slavery and eating human excrement.
The basis of the Christian religion is: There is a God, who tortured his son because of the disobedience of his creation. Think about it!

DEUTERONOMY 20 13-16 And when the Lord thy God hath delivered it into thy hands, thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword.
But the women and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself; and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies, which the Lord thy God hath given thee.

Thus shalt thou do unto all the cities which are very far off from thee, which are not of the cities of these nations.

But of the cities of these people, which the Lord thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth.

Notice the murder, genocide and plunder. Moses blamed others for the sins of Israel. I guess they were not responsible for theie actions. So they murdered and enslaved people to punish them because it was their fault..

NUMBERS 31 7-18 And they warred against the Midianites, as the Lord commanded Moses; and they slew all the males.
And they slew the kings of Midian, beside the rest of them that were slain; namely Evi, andRekem, and Zur, and Hur, and Reba, five kings of Midian: Balaam also the son of Boer they slew with the sword.
And the children of Israel took all the women of Midian captives, and their little ones, and took the spiol of all their cattle, and all their flocks, and all their goods.
And they burnt all their cities wherein they dwelt, and all their goodly castles, with fire.
And they took all the spoil, and all the prey, both of men and of beast.
And they brought the captives, and the prey, and the spoil, unto Moses, and Eleazar the priest, unto the congregation of the children of Israel, unto the camp at the plains of Moab, which are by Jordan near Jericho.
And Moses, and Eleazar the priest, and all the princes of the congregation, went forth to meet them without the camp.
And Moses was wroth with the officers of the host, with the captains over hundreds, which came from the battle.
And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive?
Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the Lord in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the Lord.
Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him.
But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.

Notice the murder, genocide and plunder. Moses blamed others for the sins of Israel. I guess they were not responsible for their actions. So they murdered and enslaved women and children to justify their actions. And by the way the women and children you don’t murder keep for yourselves.

2 SAMUEL 5-13, And David took him more concubines and wives out of Jerusalem, after after he was come from Hebron: and there were yet sons and daughters born to David.

The Hebrew word for concubine is “Pilegesh.”

Pilegesh, “pee-leh’-ghesh”: of uncert. der.; a concubine; also (masc) a paramour: concubine, paramour. --Strongs Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible.

Paramour. N. 1. An illicit lover. 2. Any lover. Websters

Notice that “Pilegesh” is also masculine. Did David and the others mentioned in the Bible also have male lovers? The Bible does not differentiate whether their lovers where male or female
Concubines appear numerous times in the Bible: Gen 25:6, 2 Sa 5:13, Dan 5:2 Judg19:29 just to name a few. Most of the Lords servants committed genocide, had slaves including children, had multiple sex partners (Male and female ?) and  plundered just about everyone.

So why do Christians condemn homosexuality and multiple sex partners????????????????

King Saul, who was always leery of David, didn’t want David to marry his daughter, so he sent him on a quest. “Saul ordered (his officials) to tell David: ‘All the King wants from you as payment for his daughter is the foreskins of a hundred dead Philistines.’ David and his men went and killed two hundred Philistines. David then took the foreskins to Saul and counted them out. Read it for yourself:

“And Saul said, Thus shall ye say to David, The King desireth not any dowry, but an hundred foreskins of the Philistines, to be avenged of the king’s enemies. But Saul thought to make David fall by the hand of the Philistines. And when his servants told David these words, it pleased David well to be the king’s son in law: and the days were not expired. Wherefore David arose and went, he and his men, and slew of the Philistines two hundred men; and David brought their foreskins, and they gave them in full tale to the king, that he might be the king’s son in law. And Saul gave him Michal his daughter to wife. And Saul saw and knew that the Lord was with David, and that Michal his daughter to wife.” 1 SAMUEL 18:25-28

Can you imagine David standing in front of Saul counting little ringlets of human skin?

In Ezekiel, God’s angry over their wicked ways, ordered the children of Israel to eat human excrement:  “And thou shalt eat it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake it with dung that cometh out of a man, in their sight. Even thus shall the children of Israel eat their defiled bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them.” (Ezekiel 4:12-13)

Ezekiel informed the Lord that he has always had good dietary habits and the Lord told Ezekiel he could eat cow excrement instead. “Then said I, Ah Lord God! Behold, my soul hath not been polluted: for from my youth up even till now have I not eaten of that which dieth of itself, or is torn in pieces; neither came there abominable flesh into my mouth. Then he said unto me, Lo, I have given thee cow’s dung for man’s dung, and thou shalt prepare thy bread therewith. (Ezekiel 4:14-15)

What about Luke 14:26 in which Jesus (who never existed) said “ If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.

Look at all of the genocide, murder, slavery, pain, anguish, torture, beastality, pedophilia and plunder that has been done in the name of a religion.

Read the Papal Bull’s of 1455 and 1493. The Pope ordered the murder and enslavement of those who did not accept Christianity. Those Bull’s have never been repealed. Read the Charters granted by the Kings pertaining to America. Look what the Christians did in Hawaii, Haiti, Africa and to the Native Americans. The Native Americans were murdered, raped, starved, plundered and their land was stolen. Why do you complain when the government takes what you think is your land? It is not your land, it was stolen from the Native Americans. The Christians in the name of Jesus Christ destroyed the Native Americans because the Popes, Kings and United States Government  ordered it. The Talmud defines all non-Jews as animals so it promotes the murder of them. When are the people on this planet going to wake up? The bottom line is that most of the people on this planet are hypocrites, murders, thieves and liars and they justify it through their religion. When you go to another country and destroy, burn, rape and plunder, they have parades for you when you return home. They have holidays for you and even build monuments to you. You can even earn a medal if you kill enough people. Fathers and mothers are proud of their sons for all the murder and genocide that they have committed. It is so bad now that if you do not want to murder people you will be thrown in jail, you will be ostracized in your community and you will be labeled a communist. Most family members would be embarrassed because you do not want to murder other people. The mindset is incredible!


If you want the truth and the answer to the problems of the World go




Religious-rights lawsuit filed,htm   

Pay The Price

Are Christians in America Targets of Socially Acceptable Persecution?

The War on the Christian Middle Class

While the sheep are sleeping, the predators move in.

There are NO Statutes of Limitations on the Crimes of Genocide (WACO)!


WIZARD OF OZ and the ILLUMINATI MIND CONTROL CHAPTER 5 SCIENCE NO. 5 - THE SKILL OF LYING, THE ART OF DECEIT The rule of thumb that the programmers/handlers go by is that they

Electronic Mind Control
Warning: Reading this material might induce significant anxiety or depression. Individuals with a history of heart problems, or who are being treated for depression, may find it

Mind Control & Timothy McVeigh's Rise from "Robotic" Soldier to Mad Bomber
Mind Control & Timothy McVeigh's Rise from "Robotic" Soldier to Mad Bomber By Alex Constantine The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it. - Joseph

Is Your Mind At Fahrenheit -459

Politically Correct - What has the Supreme Court stated in that regard?

flagft.gif (3415 bytes)

Subscribe to apfn-1
chooser.gif (706373 bytes)
Powered by

American Patriot Friends Network

"...a network of net workers..."

APFN Sitemap

APFN Message Board

APFN Contents Page

APFN Home Page


Hit Counter

Last updated 08/07/2010