Libby: Bush Authorized Leak To Times

BCST 8/27/06
9/11 ACCOUNTABILTY Vs. "The Case For Impeachment"


Libby: Bush Authorized Leak To Times
A new revelation coming former White House aide "Scooter" Libby says President George Bush authorized a leak of classified information to the New York Times — which more than ever points out that the administration clamps down on leakers who are "whistleblowers" but uses leaks when it suits their political purposes.

Two publications have the story — and it's not going to help Bush's or his administration's credibility. First, there's the New York Sun, which is sometimes called a "conservative newspaper" by people on the left so it'll be hard for administration supporters to dismiss it as coming from a liberal publication:
A former White House aide under indictment for obstructing a leak probe, I. Lewis Libby, testified to a grand jury that he gave information from a closely-guarded "National Intelligence Estimate" on Iraq to a New York Times reporter in 2003 with the specific permission of President Bush, according to a new court filing from the special prosecutor in the case.

The court papers from the prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, do not suggest that Mr. Bush violated any law or rule. However, the new disclosure could be awkward for the president because it places him, for the first time, directly in a chain of events that led to a meeting where prosecutors contend the identity of a CIA employee, Valerie Plame, was provided to a reporter.

Mr. Fitzgerald's inquiry initially focused on the alleged leak, which occurred after a former ambassador who is Ms. Plame's husband, Joseph Wilson, wrote an op-ed piece in the New York Times questioning the accuracy of statements Mr. Bush made about Iraq's nuclear procurement efforts in Africa.

No criminal charges have been brought for the leak itself, but Mr. Libby, a former chief of staff to Vice President Cheney, was indicted in October on charges that he obstructed the investigation, perjured himself in front of the grand jury, and lied to FBI agents who interviewed him. Mr. Libby, who resigned from the White House and pleaded not guilty, is scheduled to go on trial in January 2007.

In a court filing late Wednesday responding to requests from Mr. Libby's attorneys for government records that might aid his defense, Mr. Fitzgerald shed new light on Mr. Libby's claims that he was authorized to provide sensitive information to the Times reporter, Judith Miller, at a meeting on July 8, 2003.
National Journal's Murray Waas (who consistency writes some of the best, most solid investigative pieces in American journalism today) has this:
Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff has testified that President Bush authorized him to disclose the contents of a highly classified intelligence assessment to the media to defend the Bush administration's decision to go to war with Iraq, according to papers filed in federal court on Wednesday by Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor in the CIA leak case.

Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff has testified that President Bush authorized him to disclose the contents of a highly classified intelligence assessment to the media to defend the Bush administration's decision to go to war with Iraq, according to papers filed in federal court on Wednesday by Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor in the CIA leak case.

I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby testified to a federal grand jury that he had received "approval from the President through the Vice President" to divulge portions of a National Intelligence Estimate regarding Saddam Hussein's purported efforts to develop nuclear weapons, according to the court papers. Libby was said to have testified that such presidential authorization to disclose classified information was "unique in his recollection," the court papers further said.

Libby also testified that an administration lawyer told him that Bush, by authorizing the disclosure of classified information, had in effect declassified the information. Legal experts disagree on whether the president has the authority to declassify information on his own.

The White House had no immediate reaction to the court filing.
But it gets even worse for Bush and for those who are defending him because it is in their political interest to play defense lawyer for this administration:
Although not reflected in the court papers, two senior government officials said in interviews with National Journal in recent days that Libby has also asserted that Cheney authorized him to leak classified information to a number of journalists during the run-up to war with Iraq. In some instances, the information leaked was directly discussed with the Vice President, while in other instances Libby believed he had broad authority to release information that would make the case to go to war.

In yet another instance, Libby had claimed that President Bush authorized Libby to speak to and provide classified information to Washington Post assistant managing editor Bob Woodward for "Plan of Attack," a book written by Woodward about the run-up to the Iraqi war.
There are several things about these new developments:
  1. This administration does not just have a credibility problem, it has a credibility catastrophe.
  2. Bush is now in the "loop" on these allegations. The stories point out that he didn't violate any law — but he can't talk about how leakers hurt the government if he is actively involved himself in leaking when it suits his political purposes.
  3. This underscores again the abysmal failure of one-party government where there is effectively no vigorous Congressional oversight for political reasons. Under one party government Congressional CYLYKW (Cover Your Leader's You-Know-What) has replaced Congressional oversight.
  4. Expect that if there are more revelations to come out, they will. Under the old modus operendi of journalism, this kind of story would trigger a competition in the media to get more on this angle (the President participated in what other ones did he participate in?). The new attention deficit media of the early 21st Century may not pursue it the same way, but it's unlikely that this will be the last story looking closely at Bush's role.
  5. If the Democrats gain control of the House in 2006 it'll be a whole new ball game. It will not necessarily mean impeachment proceedings (which is the threat some GOPers are using to try and rally their base for the mid-term elections). But there will be the threat of real — if even excessive — Congressional oversight coupled with political consequences.
It'll be interesting to see if additional revelations will be forthcoming from Mr. Libby (who should turn down that hunting invitation from Vice President Dick Cheney...)

4/05/06 PDF of entire 39-page Fitzgerald filing

Top White House aide says Bush OK'ed leak of Iraq intelligence
Created: 4/6/2006 2:15:54 PM
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Court papers show Vice President Cheney's former chief of staff says President Bush authorized the leak of sensitive intelligence on Iraq.
The filings are in the case of Lewis Libby, who is charged in the leak of a CIA agent's identity.
Before his indictment, Libby testified to a grand jury that Cheney told him to pass on information and that Bush authorized the leak.
There is no indication in the filing that either Bush or Cheney authorized Libby to disclose Valerie Plame's identity. But the documents indicate Bush and Cheney set up Libby as a secret source to reporters about prewar intelligence on Iraq.
The papers from Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald say Libby had the conversation in which the C-I-A agent's name was leaked after Cheney told him Bush gave the go-ahead "to disclose certain information" from an intelligence report.

*IRAQ WAR BACK STORY: Fitzgerald, Scooter, Miller, Rove, Cheney, Grand Jury, Frog Marching, Wilson, Plame, Cooper... Don't Forget the Back Story! What Really Matters: A Listeners' Digest! MUST HEAR! From the Charles Goyette Show Archives! MP3 Audio, Segment 3 CLICK HERE!


"Lawless World," reveals Bush and Tony Blair taking the law into their own hands...
British international law professor Philippe Sands, author of “Lawless World,” reveals President Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair secretly agreed in January 2003 to invade Iraq in mid-March 2003 regardless of the outcome of diplomatic efforts. [includes rush transcript]
New evidence has emerged that President Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair agreed in January 2003 to attack Iraq regardless of whether diplomatic efforts succeeded. The revelation comes in a newly updated version of the book “Lawless World” by British international law professor Philippe Sands. According to the book, Blair offered Bush his full support of the war during a meeting at the White House in January 2003. Sands says his account is based on a summary of the meeting prepared by one of the participants. According to the book, Bush is recorded as saying that "the start date for the military campaign was now penciled in for 10 March. That was when the bombing would begin. The military timetable meant that an early resolution was needed."
Bush also reportedly said the "diplomatic strategy had to be arranged around the military planning". In addition the book reveals President Bush told Blair that the United Stated was considering flying U2 spy planes disguised as United Nations planes over Iraq in an attempt to provoke Saddam Hussein. If Iraq fired on the planes, it would help justify a U.S.-led invasion.
Full Audio:


Macromedia Flash Player Download Center
Download Now

Leak-Gate Part 1: The Lies
Flash Player

Leak-Gate Part 2: The Leak
Flash Player 

Leak-Gate Part 3: ‘more leaks, call the plumber'
Flash Player 

LEAK - GATE: Page 1

Bush: Hands Possibly as Dirty as Scooter Libby's,news,72774,2.html

APFN Pogo Radio Your Way

American Patriot Friends Network

"... a network of net workers..."

APFN Message Board

APFN Contents Page

APFN Home Page


FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (C ) material the use of
which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance
understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and
social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair
use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C.
section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without

Hit Counter