PENTAGON & CIA PRACTICED 9-11-2001

flight77-10.jpg (23619 bytes)

 Translate this Page!

http://tinyurl.com/69wull  

Pentagon MASCAL exercise simulates scenarios in preparing for
emergencies

Military District of Washington - News: Contingency planning

PENTAGRAM [actual title of official newsletter!]
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE NEWS
Washington, D.C., Nov. 3, 2000

The fire and smoke from the downed passenger aircraft billows
from the Pentagon courtyard. Defense Protective Services Police
seal the crash sight. Army medics, nurses and doctors scramble to
organize   aid. An Arlington Fire Department chief dispatches his
equipment to the affected areas.

Don Abbott, of Command Emergency Response Training, walks over to
the Pentagon and extinguishes the flames. The Pentagon was a
model and the "plane crash" was a simulated one.

The Pentagon Mass Casualty Exercise, as the crash was called, was
just one of several scenarios that emergency response teams were
exposed to Oct. 24-26 in the Office of the Secretaries of
Defense   conference room.

On Oct. 24, there was a mock terrorist incident at the Pentagon
Metro stop and a construction accident to name just some of the
scenarios that were practiced to better prepare local agencies
for real incidents.

To conduct the exercise, emergency personnel hold radios that are
used to rush help to the proper places, while toy trucks
representing rescue equipment are pushed around the exercise
table.

Cards are then passed out to the various players designating the
number of casualties and where they should be sent in a given
scenario.

To conduct the exercise, a medic reports to Army nurse Maj. Lorie
Brown a list of 28 casualties so far. Brown then contacts her
superior on the radio, Col. James Geiling, a doctor in the
command room across the hall.

Geiling approves Brown's request for helicopters to evacuate the
wounded. A policeman in the room recommends not moving bodies and
Abbott, playing the role of referee, nods his head in agreement.

"If you have to move dead bodies to get to live bodies, that's
okay," Abbott says as the situation unfolds.

Geiling remarked on the importance of such exercises.

"The most important thing is who are the players?" Geiling said.
"And what is their modus operandi?" Brown thought the exercise
was excellent preparation for any potential disasters.

"This is important so that we're better prepared," Brown said.
"This is to work out the bugs. Hopefully it will never happen,
but this way we're prepared."

An Army medic found the practice realistic.

"You get to see the people that we'll be dealing with and to
think about the scenarios and what you would do," Sgt. Kelly
Brown said. "It's a real good scenario and one that could happen
easily."

A major player in the exercise was the Arlington Fire Department.

Our role is fire and rescue," Battalion Chief R.W. Cornwell said.
"We get to see how each other operates and the roles and
responsibilities of each. You have to plan for this. Look at all
the air traffic around here."

Each participant was required to fill out an evaluation form
after the training exercise.

We go over scenarios that are germane to the Pentagon," Jake
Burrell of the Pentagon Emergency Management Team said. 'You play
the way you practice. We want people to go back to their
organizations and look at their S.O.P. (standard operating
procedure) and see how they responded to any of the incidents."

Burrell has coordinated these exercises for four years and he
remarked that his team gets better each year.

Abbott, in his after action critique, reminded the participants
that the actual disaster is only one-fifth of the incident and
that the whole emergency would run for seven to 20 days and might
involve as many as 17 agencies.

The emergency to a certain extent is the easiest part, Abbott
said. He reminded the group of the personal side of a disaster.
Families wanting to come to the crash sight for closure.

In this particular crash there would have been 341 victims.

(Ryan is a staff writer with the Fort Myer Military Community's
Pentagram.)

*******************************



PENTAGON Official Facts & Figures

U.S. Department of Defense

The Pentagon—a building, institution, and symbol—was conceived at
the request of Brigadier General Brehon B. Sommervell, Chief of
the Construction Division of the Office of the Quartermaster
General, on a weekend in mid-July 1941. The purpose was to
provide a temporary solution to the War Department's critical
shortage of space. The groundbreaking ceremony took place on
September 11, 1941. The building was dedicated on January 15,
1943, nearly 16 months to the day after the groundbreaking.

Prime contract awarded 11 August 1941
Mechanical engineering contract awarded 3 September 1941
Construction began 11 September 1941


===================================================

Dragon eating World Trade Center is chosen as logo for US Marine
Corps Urban Warfare both BEFORE and AFTER 9-11-2001...
http://tinyurl.com/6hhkn4


World Trade Center type building in gunsight crosshairs is chosen
as logo for US Marine Corps Operation METROPOLIS both BEFORE and
AFTER 9-11-2001...
http://tinyurl.com/6c22t4


US Marine Corps Operation is playing with urban nukes...
http://tinyurl.com/6xazlx


Inverted Pentagram chosen as logo for Pentagon autopsies...
http://jag.cami.jccbi.gov./cariprofile.asp


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.  http://tinyurl.com/5b8ur6

PENTAGON CHIEFS PLANNED FOR JET ATTACK


MILITARY chiefs were so convinced terrorists could fly a plane
into the Pentagon that they planned for an attack.

Almost 11 months before the September 11 suicide mission killed
189 people at America's defence headquarters, they carried out a
detailed emergency exercise.

US authorities have consistently claimed they had no idea
al-Qaeda was thinking of crashing planes into buildings.
President Bush insists no one ever had considered such a
devastating attack.

But a report reveals that between October 24 and 26 2000,
military planners held an exercise to prepare for "incidents
including a passenger plane crashing into the Pentagon".

The report in an internal Pentagon newspaper reads like an
account of what actually happened: "The fire and smoke from the
downed aircraft billows from the courtyard.

"Defence Protective Services Police seal the crash site. Army
medics, nurses and doctors scramble to organise aid ... Fire
Department chief dispatches his equipment."

Democrats said the Mass Casualty Exercise added to proof that
different arms of government did not know what others were doing.

Senator Bob Graham, who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee,
said: "We have a lot of information coming but it is not going to
the same source for analysis.

"So A knows part one, B knows part two and C knows part three but
nobody knows all the parts."

Pentagon emergency planning spokesman Glen Flood said: "We had
been aware there could be possible aeroplane accidents and we
have had various tabletop exercises."

The hijackers of the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania intended
to hit the White House, it was revealed.

White House sources said the information had come from Abu
Zubaydah, a senior al-Qaeda terrorist who is being questioned at
an undisclosed destination.

The White House faced more embarrassment after the independent
Centre for Immigration Studies said at least half the 48 Muslim
militants linked to terrorist plots in the US since 1993 had
broken or abused immigration laws to stay in America.


=================================================

http://wbz4.com/news/StoryFolder/story_704640386_html site down 12/08

Agency Planned Exercise On Sept. 11 Built Around A Plane Crashing
Into A Building

Aug 21, 2002 10:00 pm US/Eastern

(AP)-(Washington)-In what the government describes as a bizarre
coincidence, one U.S. intelligence agency was planning an
exercise
last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft crashed
into one of its buildings. But the cause wasn't
terrorism -- it was to be a simulated accident.

Officials at the Chantilly, Va.-based National
Reconnaissance Office had scheduled an
exercise that morning in which a small
corporate jet crashed into one of the four
towers at the agency's headquarters building
after experiencing a mechanical failure.

The agency is about four miles from the runways of Washington
Dulles
International Airport.

Agency chiefs came up with the scenario to test employees'
ability to respond to a disaster, said spokesman Art Haubold. To
simulate the damage from the plane, some stairwells and exits
were to be closed off, forcing employees to find other ways to
evacuate the building.

"It was just an incredible coincidence that this happened to
involve an aircraft crashing into our facility," Haubold said.
"As soon as the real world events began, we canceled the
exercise."

Terrorism was to play no role in the exercise, which had been
planned for several months, he said.

Adding to the coincidence, American Airlines Flight 77 -- the
Boeing 767 that was hijacked and crashed into the Pentagon --
took off from Dulles at 8:10 a.m. on Sept. 11, 50 minutes before
the exercise was to begin. It struck the Pentagon around 9:40
a.m., killing 64 aboard the plane and 125 on the ground.

The National Reconnaissance Office operates many of the nation's
spy
satellites. It draws its personnel from the military and the CIA.

After the Sept. 11 attacks, most of the 3,000 people who work at
agency headquarters were sent home, save for some essential
personnel, Haubold said.

An announcement for an upcoming homeland security conference in
Chicago first noted the exercise.

In a promotion for speaker John Fulton, a CIA officer assigned as
chief of NRO's strategic gaming division, the announcement says,
"On the morning of September 11th 2001, Mr. Fulton and his team
... were running a pre-planned simulation to explore the
emergency response issues that would be created if a plane were
to strike a building. Little did they know that the scenario
would come true in a dramatic way that day."

The conference is being run by the National Law Enforcement and
Security Institute.


====================================================

site down 12/08
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=524&u=/ap/20020821/ap_wo_en_po/us_sept_11_plane_exercise_1&printer=1


Yahoo! News   Thursday, August 22, 2002


Agency planned exercise on Sept. 11 built around a plane crashing
into a building

Wed Aug 21, 7:45 PM ET

By JOHN J. LUMPKIN, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - In what the government describes as a bizarre
coincidence, one U.S. intelligence agency was planning an
exercise last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft would crash
into one of its buildings. But the cause wasn't terrorism — it
was to be a simulated accident.

Officials at the Chantilly, Virginia-based National
Reconnaissance Office had scheduled an exercise that morning in
which a
small corporate jet would crash into one of the four towers at
the agency's headquarters building after experiencing a
mechanical failure.

The agency is about 4 miles (6 kilometers) from the runways of
Washington Dulles International Airport.

Agency chiefs came up with the scenario to test employees'
ability to respond to a disaster, said spokesman Art Haubold.

No actual plane was to be involved — to simulate the damage from
the crash, some stairwells and exits were to be closed
off, forcing employees to find other ways to evacuate the
building.

"It was just an incredible coincidence that this happened to
involve an aircraft crashing into our facility," Haubold said.
"As
soon as the real world ( news - Y! TV) events began, we canceled
the exercise."

Terrorism was to play no role in the exercise, which had been
planned for several months, he said.

Adding to the coincidence, American Airlines Flight 77 — the
Boeing 767 that was hijacked and crashed into the Pentagon (
news - web sites) — took off from Dulles at 8:10 a.m. on Sept.
11, 50 minutes before the exercise was to begin. It struck
the Pentagon around 9:40 a.m., killing 64 aboard the plane and
125 on the ground.

The National Reconnaissance Office operates many of the nation's
spy satellites. It draws its personnel from the military and
the CIA ( news - web sites).

After the Sept. 11 attacks, most of the 3,000 people who work at
agency headquarters were sent home, save for some
essential personnel, Haubold said.

An announcement for an upcoming homeland security conference in
Chicago first noted the exercise.

In a promotion for speaker John Fulton, a CIA officer assigned as
chief of NRO's strategic gaming division, the
announcement says, "On the morning of September 11th 2001, Mr.
Fulton and his team ... were running a pre-planned
simulation to explore the emergency response issues that would be
created if a plane were to strike a building. Little did they
know that the scenario would come true in a dramatic way that
day."

The conference is being run by the National Law Enforcement and
Security Institute.

On the Net:

National Reconnaissance Office:
http://www.nro.gov

Central Intelligence Agency:
http://www.cia.gov

National Law Enforcement and Security Institute:
http://www.nlsi.net

=======================================================

PENTAGON'S ROBOT BOMBERS SINCE WORLD WAR ONE
http://geocities.com/killer_robot_jetplanes
(PIRATE NEWS - SEPTEMBER 911 SURPRISE - NEWS ARCHIVE)

**************************************

http://tinyurl.com/69253u
US Air Force Museum
Unpiloted Vehicles Index
[photos and details of these war-worn handymanless gadgets]

Unpiloted Vehicles (Drones)

Beechcraft MQM-107 "Streaker"

Beechcraft QU-22B [converted 6 seater Bonanza "private plane"...]

Bell XGAM-63 "Rascal" (surface to air with nuclear warhead, 1946)

Boeing AGM-86B (ALCM) Air-Launched Cruise Missile

YCGM-121B Boeing Robotic Air Vehicle (recon, 1972)

Boeing YQM-94A "Compass Cope B"

Culver PQ-14B (practice target, private civilian aircraft,
retractable gear, 1940)

Dart Aerial Gunnery Target (tow target, 1968)

General Atomics RQ-1 "Predator" (recon, bomber, 1994)

Ground Launched Cruise Missile (deployed in Europe for NATO,
nuclear warhead, 1983)

Kettering Aerial Torpedo "Bug" (Ground Launched Cruise Missle,
World War One, 1918)

Lockheed D-21B [1/3rd of Mach 3 SR-71, recon, 1964]

Lockheed Martin-Boeing RQ-3A "DarkStar" (1996)

McDonnell ADM-20 "Quail" (air launched decoy with identical RADAR
image of airliner-sized B-52)

North American AGM-28B "Hound Dog" (air-launched supersonic
missile, destroy heavily-defended ground targets, 1959)

Northrop AGM-136A "Tacit Rainbow" (Air-launched, circle, locate
and destroy ground RADAR, 1984)

Radioplane OQ-2A Radio-Controlled Aerial Target (Small private
civilian plane size, target practice, 1935)

Republic/Ford Aerospace JB-2 "Loon" (Pentagon version of NAZI V-1
Buzz Bomb Cruise Missle, DURING World War Two, January 1945)

Ryan AQM-34N Reconnaissance Drone (60,000 foot altitude,
Vietnam-China War recon, 1969

Ryan BQM-34 "Firebee" (remote-controlled target drone, 1958)

Ryan BQM-34F "Firebee II" (high-speed target drone, 1960)

Teledyne Ryan AQM-34L "Firebee" (supersonic target drone)

Teledyne Ryan AQM-81A (Tiny Mach 4+ rocket target drone, 100,000+
altitude, 1979)

Teledyne-Ryan AQM-91A "Compass Arrow" (stealth Recon drone in
China during Vietnam-China Wars)


See also...
Missiles


=========================================
LA PENTAGATE
Missing Boeing 757 makes 5 foot hole in Pentagon
http://www.geocities.com/s911surprise3b/american_airlines_flight_77/


PIRATE NEWS - PENTAGON PACIFIED BY AA77?
Official conspiracy theory by US gov't alleges Saudi agents
attacked USA on 911 (they ought to know since they trained them
at US military bases), even after 7 alleged hijackers turn up
alive and well. Now that's what I call a bold-faced "conspiracy
theory!" Or is "conspiracy factory" a more plausible description?
http://geocities.com/s911surprise3b/american_airlines_flight_77

US invented air attack on Pentagon, claims French book
http://www.guardian.co.uk/september11/story/0,11209,677112,00.html


"It's easy to imagine an infinite number of situations where the
government might legitimately give out false information. It's an
unfortunate reality that the issuance of incomplete information
and even misinformation by government may sometimes be perceived
as necessary to protect vital interests."
—US Solicitor-General Theodore "Ted" Olson, Harbury vs. United
States, US Supreme Court, 17 March 2002 (Olson's 3rd wife
Barbara, an ex-federal prosecutor and CNN pundit, was allegedly
murdered on the invisible American Airlines Flight 77 that didn't
crash into the Pentagon). Mrs. Harbury argued her case pro se to
the US Supreme Court regarding the US CIA murdering her husband
in Central America
http://

"It was like a cruise missile with wings, went right there and
slammed into the Pentagon," Mike Walter, an eyewitness, told CNN.
"Huge explosion, great ball of fire, smoke started billowing out,
and then it was just chaos on the highway as people either tried
to move around the traffic and go down either forward or
backwards."
—CNN.COM, "Up to 800 possibly dead at Pentagon", September 12,
2001

Steve Patterson, 43, said he was watching television reports of
the World Trade Center being hit when he saw a silver commuter
jet fly past the window of his 14th-floor apartment in Pentagon
City. The plane was about 150 yards away, approaching from the
west about 20 feet off the ground, Patterson said. He said the
plane, which sounded like the high-pitched squeal of a fighter
jet, flew over Arlington cemetary so low that he thought it was
going to land on I-395. He said it was flying so fast that he
couldn't read any writing on the side. The plane, which appeared
to hold about eight to 12 people, headed straight for the
Pentagon but was flying as if coming in for a landing on a
nonexistent runway, Patterson said. Eyewitness described a small
jet aircraft seating a maximum of 12 passengers and crew, NOT an
airliner, flying "like a fighter jet" at high speed below treetop
level.
—News reports reposted on WhatReallyHappened.com


========================================


"There are no innocent civilians..., so it doesn't bother me so
much to be killing innocent bystanders."
—General Curtis E. LeMay, US Air Force Chief of Staff (1961 -
1965), Vice Presidential running mate of George Wallace
(attempted assassination resulting in paraplegia), National
Journal, 11/26/94
http://www.af.mil/

"We could blow up a drone (unmannded) vessel anywhere in the
Cuban waters. The presense of Cuban planes or ships merely
investigating the intent of the vessel could be fairly compelling
evidence that the ship was taken under attack. The US could
follow with an air/sea rescue operation covered by US fighters to
"evacuate" remaining members of the non-existant crew. Casualty
lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national
indignation. We could develop a Communist Cuba terror campaign in
the Miami area, in other Flordia cities and even in Washington.
The terror campaign could be pointed at Cuban refugees seeking
haven in the United States. We could sink a boatload of Cubans
enroute to Florida (real or simulated). We could foster attempts
on lives of Cubans in the United States even to the extent of
wounding in instances to be widely publicized. Exploding a few
bombs in carefully chosen spots. The arrest of Cuban agents and
the release of prepared documents substantiating cuban
involvement. Use of MIG-type aircraft by US pilots could provide
additional provocation. Harassment of civil air, attacks on
surface shipping, and destruction of US military drone aircraft
by MIG type planes would be useful. An F-86 properly painted
would convince air passengers that they saw a Cuban MIG,
especially if the pilot of the transport were to announce that
fact. Hijacking attampts against US civil air and surface craft
should be encouraged. It is possible to create an incident which
would demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked
and shot down a chartered civilian airliner from the United
States. An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as
an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a
CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated
time the duplicate would be subsituted for the actual civil
aircraft and the passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared
aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a
drone. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual
aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rondevous. From the
rondevous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to
minimum altitude and go directly to an auxiliary airfield at
Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the
passengers and return the aircraft to its original status.
Meanwhile the drone aircraft will continue to fly the filed
flight plan. The drone will be transmitting on the international
distress frequency "MAY DAY" message stating it is under attack
by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by
the destruction of aircraft which will be triggered by radio
signal. This will allow IACO radio stations to tell the US what
has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to "sell"
the incident. It is possible to create an incident that will make
it appear that Communist Cuban MIGs have destroyed a USAF
aircraft over international waters in an unprovoked attack. On
one such flight, a pre-briefed pilot would fly Tail-end Charlie.
While near the Cuban island this pilot would broadcast that he
had been jumped by MIGs and was going down. This pilot would then
fly at extremely low altitude and land at a secure base, an Eglin
auxiliary. The aircraft would be met by the proper people,
quickly stored and given a new tail number. The pilot who
performed the mission under an alias would resume his proper
identity. The pilot and aircraft would then have disappeared. A
submarine or small craft would distribute F-101 parts, parachute,
etc. The pilots retuning to Homestead would have a true story as
far as they knew. Search ships and aircraft could be dispatched
and parts of aircraft found. It is understood that the Department
of State is also preparing suggested courses of action to
develope justification for US military intervention in Cuba."
—General L. L. Limnitzer, Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff
TOP SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING NOFORN
The Joint Chiefs of Staff
Pentagon, Washington DC
Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense
Subject: Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba
(TS)
JCS to Secretary of War Robert McNamara
March 13, 1962
(Operation NORTHWOODS Declassified in 2000 - pdf images of actual
documents, 15 pages, 750kb)
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/doc1.pdf
http://tinyurl.com/59cgcy
http://tinyurl.com/6n9a43

"The Pentagon—a building, institution, and symbol—was conceived
at the request of Brigadier General Brehon B. Sommervell, Chief
of the Construction Division of the Office of the Quartermaster
General, on a weekend in mid-July 1941. The purpose was to
provide a temporary solution to the War Department's critical
shortage of space.The groundbreaking ceremony took place on
September 11, 1941. The building was dedicated on January 15,
1943, nearly 16 months to the day after the groundbreaking.
Construction began 11 September 1941."
—The Pentagon: Headquarters for US Department of Defense, Facts &
Figures, updated: 25-Oct-2000
https://www.dmdc.osd.mil/


=================================================


http://tinyurl.com/57ukl4

Beyond 2000 - CORPORATE PREDATOR DRONES

22 November 2001 - "Aerospace giant Boeing has decided that it
needs to give serious thought to cutting pilots out of the
cockpit. The company has established a new organisation dedicated
to efforts in the expanding 'unmanned systems' market and aimed
at fast-tracking the development of pilotless aircraft. At one
time, the US military said it had no desire to allow unmanned
aircraft to carry lethal payloads. However, following tests last
year with Predator UAV's firing Hellfire anti-tank missiles, and
the subsequent deployment and success of the pairing in killing
tanks in Afghanistan, the Pentagon has warmed rapidly to the
idea. The Boeing group will look at the feasibility of cheap,
expendable UAV's that could be sent on suicidal missions. Based
in St.Louis, the new Unmanned Systems group will be headed up by
Mike Heinz and report to both Jerry Daniels, president and chief
executive officer of Boeing Military Aircraft and Missile
Systems, and George Muellner, president, Boeing Phantom Works,
the company's advanced research-and-development unit. 'Unmanned
systems are the future of aerospace,' Daniels said."


========================================

http://tinyurl.com/6crl3z

War on terror - Landing by remote control doesn't quite fly with
pilots

By Jeff Long
Tribune staff reporter
Published September 28, 2001

The military has been flying planes and landing them safely by
remote control for years, but airline pilots say questions about
security must be answered before that technology is used aboard
commercial jetliners to thwart hijackers the way President Bush
suggested Thursday during a speech in Chicago. Pentagon's
Predator drone attacks Afganistan and Iraq


"We will look at all kinds of technologies to make sure that our
airlines are safe," Bush said at O'Hare International Airport.
"... including technology to enable controllers to take over
distressed aircraft and land it by remote control."

Pilots said after the speech that though they support other
proposals for airplane security that Bush outlined, the idea of
aircraft being remotely controlled concerns them.

"If the good guys can take control of the plane" from the ground,
said John Mazor, a spokesman for the Air Line Pilots Association,
"maybe the bad guys can take control of it too."

Taking control of a hijacked aircraft from the ground appears to
be less feasible than other measures, he said.

"We would view that as a very--very--long-term type of
undertaking," Mazor said. "There are enormous technical
difficulties in trying to rig up an aircraft for that."

But companies that have designed such systems for the military
say it wouldn't be difficult to adapt the technology for
commercial aircraft. Why did USAF pilots name the 1950s designed
Vietnam era F105 Thunderchief a THUD? Because it made a BIG THUD
when it hit the ground while using an autopilot with Low Altitude
Terrain Following RADAR


General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc. developed a
remote-controlled reconnaissance plane for the Air Force called
Predator, which flew in Bosnia during the conflict there. Used by
the military since 1994, it can be landed by pilots linked by
satellite using controls on the ground or ordering an onboard
computer to do the job.

Tom Cassidy, president and CEO of the San Diego company, said he
sent Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta a letter shortly
after the Sept. 11 attacks.

"Such a system would not prevent a hijacker from causing mayhem
on the aircraft or exploding a device and destroying the aircraft
in flight," the letter said, "but it would prevent him from
flying the aircraft into a building or populated areas."

Cassidy said Thursday that a pilot aboard a commercial airliner
could turn the plane's guidance over to ground controllers at the
press of a button, preventing a hijacker--or anyone else
aboard--from flying the plane.

That system also would keep people on the ground from taking
control of a plane away from the pilot, Cassidy said, because the
pilot would first have to give up control.

Aircraft anywhere in the nation could be remotely controlled from
just one or two locations using satellite links, Cassidy said.
Those locations could be heavily fortified against terrorists.

"The technology is available," Cassidy said. "We use it every
day."

Copyright 2002, Chicago Tribune


===========================================

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19842-2002Nov21.html
http://tinyurl.com/63vv79

Someone To Watch Over Us
[Bush, a 4-time convicted felon, appoints 5-time convicted felon
to spy on USA for Pentaon]


Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
http://www.darpa.mil
http://jag.cami.jccbi.gov./cariprofile.asp


===========================================

POLICE MENTALITY - A MILITARY PERSPECTIVE
http://tinyurl.com/668d5h
[Pentagon special forces rescued Colonel Quadaffi before USAF and
US Navy bombers attacked Libya, killing 40 sleeping civilians and
2 sleeping USAF F111 pilots and 1 whistleblowing chief of public
affairs for USMC at Pentagon in Al Gore's hometown, plus the REAL
story behind the historic firing of USAF chief of staff during
Desert Storm]

Subscribe to apfn-1
choosersm.gif (706373 bytes)
Powered by groups.yahoo.com

AMERICAN PATRIOT FRIENDS NETWORK

"...a network of net workers..."

APFN Sitemap

APFN Message Board

APFN Sitemap

APFN Contents Page

APFN Home Page

E-Mail: APFN@apfn.org

Hit Counter