The Elephant In The Room: Full Movie - 1:32:24 - Aug 29, 2008


Subject: The "Bushbuster" emailable evidence kit.
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:52:40 +1100
From: "Gerard Holmgren"

Section 1: Airforce stand-down

1:1 It has become popular mythology  in the media that fighter jets were
scrambled to intercept the hijacked planes. This is completely untrue as
the following research shows.
Guilty For 9-11: Bush, Rumsfeld, Myers, by Illarion Bykov and Jared
Israel, 14 Nov 2001

1:2 Mr. Cheney's Cover Story -- Section 2 of Guilty For 9-11, 20 Nov

1:3 9-ll: Nothing Urgent, by George Szamuely, Research & documentation
by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel, Jan 2002

1:4 Planes "did scramble " on 9/11,they just " arrived late "

1:5 Scrambled Messages, by George Szamuely, 12 Dec 2001

1:6 Air National Guard Mission and Vision statements site down 12/08

1:7 Russian Air Force chief says official 9/11 story impossible

Scrambling of fighter jets to intercept stray aircraft is a routine
proceedure. It  happened  67 times in the 10 months between September
2000 and June 2001.

1.8 Use of military jets jumps since 9/11. Associated Press Aug 13 2002.
1.9 CBS News. Scrambling to prevent another 9/11 Aug 14 2002
1.10 Preventing another 9/11

1.11 ABC News Jets on high Alert. Aug 13 2002.
1.12 Military now notified immediately of unusual air traffic events.
Fox news Aug 12 2002,2933,60245,00.html#top site down 12/08

So on Sept 11, 2001 - Why were no fighter jets scrambled, and why has a
cover up story been concocted?

In the unlikely event that the airforce failed through incompetence,
(not once but 4 times! ) where is the major inquiry?
I have seen bigger inquiries into car crashes at race tracks.
Section 2: Complicit behavoir of G.W.Bush

It has become common mythology in the media that George W. Bush was at
Booker Elementary School when he learned of the first WTC crash. This is
a lie. Why is Bush lying about where he was, and what he knew?

2:1 Guilty for 9-11 Section 3: Bush in the open by Illarion Bykov and
Jared Israel.

And why do authorities keep telling us that nobody had ever conceived of
planes being used in this manner,

Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11; Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry
ABC News May 16 2002

when the 1994 extract from Time magazine, quoted in the previous article
demonstrates that the potential problem had been recognized for decades?

This is not the only lie Bush has told about his movements that morning.
See how many times he has changed his story.

2:3 Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion by Steve Grey.

(Read the section called "A tangle of lies")

2:4 Bush Gets Tangled in his 9-11 Lies, Part 2:
White House Cover-up Creates More Problems than it Solves
by Jared Israel and Francisco Gil-White [7 October 2002]

2:5 The President as Incompetent Liar: Bush's Claim that he Saw TV
Footage of 1st Plane Hitting WTC
Comments by Jared Israel [Posted 12 September 2002]

Clinton was impeached for lying about an affair. Bush is lying about
where he was, what he was doing and what he knew, during the crucial
period between 8.45 and 9 AM on Sept 11.
Why did the President - after being told "America is under attack"
continue to listen to schoolchildren reading for another 25 minutes ?
Why was he cheering, smiling and joking even as it was known that at
least one more hijacked plane was on the loose ? View the TV
footage which proves treason at the top level.

Section 3: The Ficticious Hijackers

If 19 Arabs hijacked the planes, why are there no Arabic names on any of
the passenger lists? If they used non-Arabic aliases, which of the "
innocents " on the lists are alleged to be the hijackers?
Passenger and crew list for AA 11 (first WTC crash.)

AA 77 (Pentagon crash)

UAL 175 (2nd WTC crash)

UAL 93 (Pensylvannia crash)

If they are alleged to have been using non- Arabic aliases (19 obviously
Arabic men got on board using non-Arabic ID, with 100% success rate ? ),
why did the FBI claim that they were traced through the use of credit
cards to buy tickets in their own names?

If 9 of the alleged hijackers were searched before boarding, as claimed
in this article
3:5 Policetalk:

why is there no airport security footage of them? How did they
(allegedly) get on board with knives, guns, AND electronic guidance
systems, while being searched, but avoiding security cameras and not
being on the passenger lists?
What aliases were they alleged to be using when they were searched,and
if they were not using aliases, why are they not on the passenger lists?

What of reports that some of the alleged hijackers are still alive, and
had nothing to do with the attacks ?

According to this article
3:11 site down 12/08

the FBI now claims that the hijackers used gas to subdue the passengers
and crew. If they used gas they would have been affected themselves -
unless they had masks. The story gets better all the time. They somehow
got on board with masks, gas, guns,knives and electronic guidance
systems, in spite of being searched, didn't show up on the airport
security cameras, and were not on the passenger lists. They left flight
manuals in Arabic in rented cars outside the airport ( last minute
brushing up on the way there, about how to fly the things!) and then
crashed the planes in breath taking displays of skilled piloting. Just
to make sure we knew who they were, their passports were conveniently
found in spite of fiery crashes which incinerated the planes and
occupants. So they got on board with false IDs but used their real
passports ?

If the mythical Arab hijackers really were on the planes and airport
security systems failed due to incompetence ( not once but 19 times! ),
where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into racehorse
doping scandals.
Section 4: More oddities

Why the official story concerning the hijacking of  AA11 (first WTC
crash) cannot possibly be true.

4:1  9/11 Redux: (The Observeršs Cut) American Airlines Flight 11,
Reexamined  By David L. Graham

Was an urban rescue team sent to New York the night before the

4.4 Former top German Cabinet Minister rejects official story of 9 11
Interview with Andreas von Buelow. Tagesspiegel Jan 13 2002.

Section 5: Where is the evidence against Bin laden?

Why is it that the US government doesn't feel confident enough of it's
case against Bin laden to lay any formal charges, but keeps " finding"
convenient video " confession" tapes ? Probably because new video
technology makes it impossible to distinguish between a real video
confession and a fake.

When seeing and hearing isn't believing. by William M. Arkin. Washington
Post Feb 1 1999

Last word in High Tech trickery. by David Higgins Sydney Morning Herald.
may 16 2002

For more detailed evidence of a preplanned agenda to fabricate evidence
against Bin Laden,

Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion by Steve Grey.

(Read the section called "Evidence please !")

Section 6: Insider trading reveals high level foreknowledge

In the first few hours after the attacks, it was reported that
investigators were already looking into huge volumes of insider trading
on airline stocks in the weeks leading up to the attacks.
Why has this story since completely disappeared? Do authorities
seriously expect us to believe that more than a year later, they still
do not know who was responsible? Should not alarm bells have been
ringing BEFORE the attacks with these record volumes of trading?
If the executive director of the CIA had previously managed the firm
which handled much of the trade, are we seriously expected to believe
that he doesn't know who was responsible?

Suppresed Details of Criminal Insider Trading Lead Directly Into The
CIA's Highest Ranks -- CIA Executive Director `Buzzy' Krongard Managed
Firm That Handled `Put' Options on UAL, by Michael C. Ruppert, 9 Oct 2001

Mystery of terror `insider dealers', by Chris Blackhurst, 14 Oct 2001

Profits of Death -- Insider Trading and 9-11, by Tom Flocco - Edited by
Michael C. Ruppert, 6 Dec 2001

Where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into local
government contract scandals.
Section 7: The pentagon frame up

It is alleged that that American Airlines 77 ( a hijacked Boeing 757 )
crashed into the Pentagon. A Boeing 757 is a very large aircraft with a
wingspan of 125 ft and a length of 155 ft. So how did it make an
initial hole 12 ft wide, collapsing only about a 35 ft depth of the
outer ring of the building - and not leave any wreckage outside ?
This photo of the damage to the Pentagon wall
proves that whatever crashed into the pentagon was NOT AA 77,
which demonstrates the Pentagon attack to have been a self - inflicted
frame up.

For a quick overview of the impossibility of the official story

For a full physical analysis of the crash scene

Physical and mathematical analysis of Pentagon crash. by Gerard Holmgren
Oct  2002


Why was there a concerted effort to fabricate eyewitness evidence for
the official story regarding AA 77?

Did AA 77 hit the Pentagon? Eyewitness accounts examined. by Gerard
Holmgren June 2002


7:5 The Pentagon crash hoax site down 12/08
Sectrion 8: If the Attack on Afghanistan was a retaliation for Sept 11,
why had it already been planned months before ?

BBC News report by George Arney.

U.S. Planned for attack on Al -Qaida. White house given strategy two
days before Sept 11.NBC news. May 16 2002
8:2 site down 12/08

US planned to hit bin Laden ahead of September 11 By David Rennie in
Why were we originally told that the attack on Afghanistan was not
planned prior to sept 11, and was purely a retaliation to a " surprise "
attack, and the story then changed after proof of the preplanned attack
came to light ?

Section 9: U.S. and Bin Laden co-operate behind the scenes.

The new story is that they allegedly feared Bin Laden so much that they
wanted to get him first. So why didn't they arrest him when they had the
chance in July 2001?
The CIA met Bin Laden while undergoing treatment at an American Hospital
last July in Dubai, by Alexandra Richard, Translated courtesy of
Tiphaine Dickson, Le Figaro, 11 Oct 2001

Bin Laden met with the CIA in July and walked away by Michael C. Ruppert
And why was the Bush family still in business with the Bin Laden Family,
even AFTER Sept 11?

Osama bin Laden's Bush family Business Connections, Alliance With
Pakistan Will Stimulate Drug Trade, Bring Revenues Under U.S. Control
--Colombian Opium Production Will Soar; The Taliban's Biggest Economic
Attack on the U.S. Came in February With The Destruction of Its Opium
Crop by Michael C. Ruppert, 18 Sept 2001
Carlyle profit from Afghan war, by David Lazarus, 2 Dec 2001

Elder Bush in Big G.O.P. Cast Toiling for Top Equity Firm, by Leslie
Wayne, 5 Mar 2001

   The George W. Bush Money Tree

Bush Family's dirty little secret: President's oil companies funded by
Bin Laden family and wealthy Saudis who financed Osama bin Laden, by
Rick Wiles,Sep 2001

Arms Buildup Enriches Carlyle Group, Bush Sr. is Consultant, by Mark
Fineman, 10 Jan 2002

Gaping holes in the CIA V Bin Laden Story by Jared Israel

BushLaden by Jared Israel

Addition to the above article

Judicial Watch:Bush/Bin Laden connection " has now turned into a scandal
" Statement from Judicial watch with comments by Jared Israel

9:15 Bin laden. Terrorist monster:Take two ! by Jared Israel. Oct 9 2001
9:16 New Chairman of 9/11 Commission had business ties with Osama's
Brother in Law    by Michel Chossudovsky 27 december 2002

And why did the US turn down an offer to extradite Bin Laden in 1996,
AFTER naming him as wanted for the 1993 WTC bombing?
Section 10: The suspicious collapse of the World trade centre Towers.

How did the WTC collapse? Why no serious inquiry? Why was the debris
rushed away for recycling before any examination could be held?

10:1 Muslims suspend laws of physics by J. McMichael Nov 25 2001
10:2 Muslims suspend laws of Physics. part 2 by J.McMichael

"Burning Questions...Need Answers": Fire Engineering's Bill Manning
Calls for Comprehensive Investigation of WTC Collapse, 4 Jan 2002
10:6 A firefighter says "we think there were bombs set in the building"

10:7 In Curious Battle: An expert recants on Why the WTC collapsed by
John Flaherty and Jared Israel

10:8 Documentary footage from the scene of the WTC attacks,and
eyewitness accounts from firefighters at the scene reveal serious flaws
in the official accounts.

For a series of engineering articles and informative videos on the WTC
collapse, see


10:10  Evidence of explosives in South WTC Tower collapse

10:11 The World Trade Centre demolition site down 12/08

10:12 Capter 1 of the FEMA WTC collapse report (with comment) site down 12/08

10:13 Capter 2 (with comment) site down 12/08

Steel melts at 1539 degrees. Jet fuel (kerosine) burns at 800 degrees.
Are we seriously expected to believe that burning kerosine towards the
top of the building ( heat travels upwards ) somehow caused both towers
to neatly implode in a manner identical to that of a controlled
demolition ?
Where is the inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into suburban
housefires. Why is discussion of  the possibility of a controlled
implosion completely taboo? Why do authorities keep inventing ridiculous
stories about burning jet fuel melting steel?
Section 11: Hands off Bin laden !

Why were the FBI told to not investigate the Bin Laden family links in
the US?

Has someone been sitting on the FBI? Transcript of a BBC Newsnight
Report on "the questionable links of the bin Laden Family," 6 Nov 2001
11:2 (added comments by
Jared Israel)

Bush thwarted FBI probe against bin Ladens, Hindustan Times, 7 Nov 2001
US efforts to make peace summed up by `oil', by Lara Marlowe, 19 Nov 2001
Called Off the Trail? FBI Agents Probing Terror Links Say They Were
Told, 'Let Sleeping Dogs Lie'
By Brian Ross and Vic Walker. ABC News Dec 19 2002
After capturing one of the six most wanted Taliban leaders, the US then
let him go. "By mistake " of course, because of "flawed intelligence."
11:7 Taliban general 'freed by mistake' Sunday Times Dec 19 2002,7034,5704967%255E15574,00.html site down 12/08

11:8 US accidentally set wanted taliban Leader free. Clari news dec 18 2002.

Section 12: Its really not so surprising.

In 1962, the joint chiefs of staff approved a CIA plan to commit
terrorist acts against the US and frame Cuba.

Friendly Fire -- Book: U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S.
Cities to Provoke War With Cuba, by David Ruppe, 1 May 2001

Pentagon Proposed Pretexts for Cuba Invasion in 1962, The National
Security Archive, 30 Apr 2001
Northwoods - a plan for terror to justify war. Comments by Jared Israel.

Scanned images of the actual document.
12.4 Page i
12.5 Page ii
12:6 Page iii
12.7 Page 1
12.8 Page 2
12.9 Page 3
12.10 Page 4
12.11 Page 5
12.12 Page 6
12.13 Page 7
12.14 Page 8
12.15 Page 9
12:16 Page 10
12.17 Page 11
12.18 Page 12

US military schemes- ominously like 9/11.
If such tactics were considered normal and acceptable practice by the
Government in 1962, what evidence is there that things have changed?

Henry Kissenger advocated a similar strategy in 1992

as Did Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1997.
A War in the Planning for Four Years. HOW STUPID DO THEY THINK WE ARE?
Zbigniew Brzezinski and the CFR Put War Plans In a 1997 Book - It Is "A
Blueprint for World Dictatorship," Says a Former German Defense and NATO
Official Who Warned of Global Domination in 1984,in an Exclusive
Interview With FTW byMichael C. Ruppert
Section 13: Who created and funded the Al Qaeda Network?

A Vital Piece of the Puzzle: Dollars for Terror -- The United States and
Islam, by Carol Brouillet ˇ

Bin Laden in the Balkans - Collection of mainstream media articles.
Compiled by Jared Israel

The Creation called Osama by Shamsul Islam

"Articles documenting US creation of taliban and Bin Laden's terrorist
network" Series of links to different articles

"Osama Bin Laden: Made in USA" by Jared Israel

"Bush and the media cover up the Jihad schoolbook scandal"  by Jared Israel

U.S. Protects Al-Qaeda Terrorists in Kosovo, by Umberto Pascali, 2 Nov 2001
Which Terrorists are worse? Al Quaeda? Or the KLA? by Jared Israel

Section14 : Who created the civil war in Afghanistan?

Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Jimmy Carter's National
Security Adviser [Posted 6 October 2001]
Ex- National Security Chief Brzezinski admits: Afghan war and Islamism
were made in Washington

Section 15:Why have the President and Vice President resisted moves
for an inquiry into Sept 11?
Bush asks Daschle to limit Sept. 11 probes  CNN Jan 29 2002.
Bush,GOP blast calls for 9/11 inquiry. CNN May 17 2002
Daschle: Bush, Cheney Urged No Sept. 11 Inquiry  Reuters newswire UK May
26 2002
Bush and Cheney Block 9-11 Investigation  By Mike Hersh Oct 24, 2002, 2:22pm
Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11; Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry
ABC News May 16 2002
15.5 Bush opposes 9/11 query panel. CBS News. May 23 2002.



Subscribe to apfn-1
Powered by

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil -
is for good men to do nothing."
                           - Edmund Burke

American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
"...a network of net workers..."

APFN Message Board

APFN Sitemap

APFN Contents Page

APFN Home Page

Hit Counter