CCW On-Target!
Originally Inspired by Northpoint Tactical Teams (NPT)
 
  

Autopsy: No Arabs on Flight 77

By Thomas R. Olmsted, M.D

 
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:12:10 -0700
From: CCW <ccw@wolfenet.com>
I am an ex Naval line officer and a psychiatrist in private practice in New Orleans, a Christian and homeschool dad. It troubled me a great deal that we rushed off to war on the flimsiest of evidence. I considered various ways to provide a smoking gun of who and why Sept 11th happened. Astute observers noticed right away that there were no Arabic sounding names on any of the flight manifests of the planes that “crashed” on that day.
FOIA Cover Page
 
Click on Image for Full Size Graphic

A list of names on a piece of paper is not evidence, but an autopsy by a pathologist, is. I undertook by FOIA request, to obtain that autopsy list and you are invited to view it below. Guess what? Still no Arabs on the list. It is my opinion that the monsters who planned this crime made a mistake by not including Arabic names on the original list to make the ruse seem more believable.

When airline disasters occur, airlines will routinely provide a manifest list for anxious families. You may have noticed that even before Sep 11th, that airlines are pretty meticulous about getting an accurate headcount before takeoff. It seems very unlikely to me, that five Arabs sneaked onto a flight with weapons.
This is the list provided by American of the 56 passengers:
 

On September 27th, the FBI published photos of the “hijackers” of Flight 77:
 

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP), does a miraculous job and identified nearly all the bodies on November 16th 2001.
 

Official Autopsy List - Page 2
 
Click on Image for Full Size Graphic

The AFIP suggest these numbers; 189 killed, 125 worked at the Pentagon and 64 were “passengers” on the plane. The AA list only had 56 and the list just obtained has 58. They did not explain how they were able to tell “victims” bodies from “hijacker” bodies. In fact, from the beginning NO explanation has been given for the extra five suggested in news reports except that the FBI showed us the pictures to make up the difference, and that makes it so.

 

Now, being the trusting sort, I figured that the government would want to quickly dispel any rumors so we could get on with the chore of kicking Osama/Sadaam’s butt (weren’t these originally two different people?). It seemed simple to me. . .produce the names of all the bodies identified by the AFIP and compare it with the publicized list of passengers. So, I sent a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the AFIP and asked for an expedited response, because we were getting ready to send our boys to war on the pretext that Osama/Sadaam had done the deed. Fourteen months later, a few US soldiers dead, many Iraqi civilians pushing up daisies, and I finally get the list. Believe me that they weren’t a bit happy to give it up, and I really have no idea why they choose now to release it.

Official Autopsy List - Page 3
 
Click on Image for Full Size Graphic

No Arabs wound up on the morgue slab; however, three ADDITIONAL people not listed by American Airline sneaked in. I have seen no explanation for these extras. I did give American the opportunity to “revise” their original list, but they have not responded. The new names are: Robert Ploger, Zandra Ploger, and Sandra Teague. The AFIP claims that the only “passenger” body that they were not able to identify is the toddler, Dana Falkenberg, whose parents and young sister are on the list of those identified. The satanic masterminds behind this caper may be feeling pretty smug about the perfect crime, but they have left a raft of clues tying these unfortunates together. Stay tuned for part two to take a much closer look of the cast of characters on this ill-fated flight.

 


 


 
9-11 TIMELINE
A Unique perspective timeline from retired 757 pilot Ralph Omholt.

A harsh fact of life is that 9-11, and its subsequent consequences, can't rationally be separated from political viewpoints and political commentary. As a larger scale of the Viet Nam War, money and power drove ALL of 9-11 and its subsequent history. Thus, 9-11 doesn't afford the Hollywood-CSI luxury of "…just analyze the evidence."

9-11 and subsequent history demonstrate a new sicience, "Virtual Un-Reality," wherein forensic benchmarks don't line up; but are passionately pandered as being otherwise 'logical' by a perverted mass media.

This presentation compiles various timelines, with the intent of this material being a collective of that which is readily documented, and that which is "…well known." The various timelines have their good & bad points. In the maze of all 9-11 matters, it is necessary to read between the proverbial lines; so as to arrive at a reasonable semblance of the truth, which is otherwise "officially" buried – with great prejudice.

While some readers may prefer to have the 9-11 flights individually broken out, the intent of this presentation is focused upon keeping the time-line continuous, as a somewhat unique forensic perspective.

It should be noted that the "official" version of 9-11 quickly surpassed the influence of Orson Wells" "War of the Worlds" broadcast. The "official" version of 9-11 contains a comparable amount of fiction. Whatever anyone wants to say, "…it sold!"

This timeline incorporates an airline captain's perspective, injecting pertinent "airline insider" information, rounding out the details of the day. When the "aviation professional" perspective is added, an entirely different version of 9-11 appears – as a far greater horror story.

For example, the "official line" is that the 9-11 aircraft had viable crewmembers and passengers, until their crash. Yet, the purported "phone call" accounts of events on board those aircraft don't suggest the 'standard" airline security procedures of the day.

The "psyops" of 9-11 heralds commoners as "heroes," ignoring the command structure of the air crews of four separate flights. In an extreme, that might happen on one flight; not four.

It's necessary to appreciate the element of "probability" in the scenes of 9-11. Four aircraft were hijacked – not by Arab wannabe pilots, who were avid students of aircraft manuals; rather by professional jet pilots.

The hijack issue instantly comes to the fact that no passenger reservation "locator code," passenger manifest or ticket can yet be produced to show that ANY of the named hijackers made it onboard the four aircraft. Certainly, there were at least four. While some measure of "error" can be reasonably anticipated, the total lack of such documentation is too extreme to be considered in the realm of "accident" or a matter of "error."

Passionate language 'suggesting" that the hijackers made the 9-11 flights can be readily found; that's inadequate for the accounting of 9-11 and the subsequent "war" campaigns. In consequence, the 'wars' became War Crimes; however unpopular it may be to say.

The strongest suggestion is that the four ACTUAL hijackers were among the passengers, with false IDs, including cockpit access credentials, such as a pilot's license, airline ID, or FAA identification.

Whether one or two hijackers – or more - on each aircraft, the issue of crew and passenger control are paramount to the designs of the hijacker, as the hijacker knows that there are effective counter-measure procedures in place. The easiest method for "crowd control" – given the suicide mission - is to kill the passengers & crew by depressurizing the aircraft. What is obviously intended is so nefarious, that the light load of passengers won't add any trouble to whatever remaining conscience the hijackers had.

The pandered Flight 93 tapes are supposed to have come from recorders propelled deeper into the ground than a high caliber bullet could reach – emerging with viable data. That's absurd; either the depth or the surviving data viability. Most amazing were the "forensic" photos of the flight recorders, not showing as much as a dent - for all the "G" load it would have taken to get the recorders as much as a foot underground.

There isn't a viable bit of evidence of a cockpit battle. Whatever happened in the cockpits was fast – and effective; very possibly guns having been smuggled on board.

Eight pilots had the training and opportunity to signal their distress or attempt to defeat their attackers by easily turning the aircraft over, using the control yoke, or stomping a rudder pedal. That didn't happen on any of the four aircraft involved. That leaves no suggestion of the purported amateur terrorists.

The scene could easily have been a "pilot" gaining access to the cockpit, via his credentials, killing both pilots & taking control of the cockpit. At most, it would take ten minutes to snuff the flight attendants and passengers. Unconsciousness would be within approximately 30 seconds, death within five minutes, as the hijacker survived, using the flight deck emergency oxygen.

There isn't a viable shred of evidence that an aircraft actually impacted at the 9-11 Pentagon; or at Shanksville, PA. Yet, those sites were obviously "prepped" for the day, just in case – in case of what? In case that only two aircraft were destroyed; notably crashed into the WTC towers. By elementary conjecture, the second two were backups, for the first two. That left two missing aircraft and around 100 missing bodies.

Obvious propaganda aside, the second two aircraft can't, otherwise, be traced to a "mission." If they had a mission apart from the WTC, there would have been no "prepping" of the Pentagon & Shanksville sites. Remember that statement - if the second two airctaft had a mission apart from the WTC, there would have been no "prepping" of the Pentagon & Shanksville sites.

The lack of large aircraft parts, the spread of the 'salted" aircraft debris and the nature of the debris make a factual impact, at those two sites, too improbable to consider. The 9-11 Pentagon and the Shanksville site lack any viable suggestion of burning jet fuel. The aircraft skin planted on the Pentagon lawn was the wrong color - from the wrong end of the purported aircraft. Pre-collapse photos don't show forward-moving damage, nor enough of a hole to swallow an aircraft; leaving the collapsed portion totally unaccountable. The forensic benchmarks leave no viable way for the purported aircraft parts to have gotten into the building. The list goes on.

It must be remembered that no one claimed the 9-11 hijackings and/or attacks; and there was no "gain" demanded. There were no political concessions demanded, no ransom, no prisoner releases – NOTHING! There was no legitimate follow-up "claimant" message to the "terror" attacks. Before the famous – and obviously phony – Osama bin Laden videotape could be produced, bin Laden emphatically denied involvement. No proof of his involvement has yet been produced – save being an involuntary patsy.

Whatever the 9-11 motive was, someone is keeping it to themselves. That's not the style of such "extremists." Years later, no Islamic group has viably claimed 9-11.

Bizarre claims of grandeur aside, Zacharias Moussaoui emerges as another "Manchurian Patsy."

There is no suggestion that the second pair of aircraft had another set of targets. Follow the money; they probably didn't – after the first two aircraft found their mark. The hijackings were terror, for sure; but whose?

The term "Reichstag Fire" comes to mind, in the shadow of the "Gulf of Tonkin Resolution," of the Viet Nam War and Texas profiteering!

9-11 is a tale of cover-up; from the White House on down. To understand 9-11, it's necessary to follow the known timeline.
 
Click here for the entire 911 Timeline & Conclusion:
http://home.comcast.net/~skydrifter/timeline.htm
 
CONCLUSION

In sum, far too much is ‘wrong’ with the official account of 9-11. Micro-managing a huge volume of excuses doesn’t offset the collective aberration of the official accounts 9-11 – and beyond. Beyond two aircraft hitting the WTC towers, little can be trusted in the “official” version of 9-11.

No intelligent person of integrity can conclude anything other than 9-11 being an inside job. That which is clearly impossible denies any possibility of 95% of the official accounts being true; add the only possible motivation for that which has been sealed by “National Security.”

If the “official” account of 9-11 is factual; there is NO possible reason to ‘seal’ the documentation and evidence of 9-11. It’s that simple.

The events of 9-11 and beyond speak exclusively to a global quest for power which the German Nazis attempted – and nearly succeeded. The descriptor “Next-Generation Nazism” fits perfectly. The American money trail, alone, speaks to that. Add such documents as the “Project for a New American Century” (PNAC) – noting the names involved. Also supporting the obvious global conquest effort, are such books as Brezinski’s “The Grand Chess Board,” and Barnett’s “The Pentagon’s New Map.”

Since when did global control/conquest become a mission for America’s “Defense Department?”

Obvious propaganda claims aside:

1. There is no documented record of the purported 9-11 terrorists making a plane reservation. If so, there would be a “record locator,” complete with details.

2. There is no documented record of the purported 9-11 terrorists buying or using a ticket. (IDs required)

3. There is no hard-copy of a printed ticket ‘copy.’

4. There is no record of the purported 9-11 terrorists on any of the passenger manifests, with all legitimate passengers being accounted for.

5. There is no record of the purported 9-11 terrorists in the autopsies.

6. There is not as much as a suggestion that the purported 9-11 terrorists had the needed pilot skills - but rather the contrary.

7. At least seven of the purported 9-11 terrorists are known to be still alive - with no questions being asked.

8. There is no documentation (per the FBI [Mueller] to link the purported 9- 11 terrorists to the events of the day!

9. The presented pictures of the 9-11 hijackers don't match the purported terrorists.

10. There is no viable evidence of a plane crash at the 9-11 Pentagon or in Pennsylvania - versus salted wreckage pieces. In the case of the Pentagon, they were even the wrong color!

11. A stopwatch says that THREE buildings at the WTC came down as controlled demolition. Add the video captures of the sequenced blasts.

12. There is no way to account for the purported WTC ‘collapse’ temperatures of the 'official' line.

13. The White House did their best to block a legitimate investigation of 9- 11.

14. For all the failures, no official has been punished for 9-11. (with trivia such as a general who had an affair being sacked, in the background.)

15. There were no WMDs. Saddam has been long deposed. Iraq had no possible connection to 9-11. For all the horrors of the USA-made Saddam, his crimes are dwarfed by the tribal genocide of Africa. How did Saddam become the ‘humanitarian’ priority?

16. Bush's invasions continue as War Crimes!

17. With the Mexican border held wide open by the White House, how much “terror” can be factual? It’s simply not possible.

18. The "terror" is assured, sooner or later. When it arrives, it will be in the form of "revenge."

THE PENTAGON HELIPAD 

ALLEGEDLY, THIS IS WHERE AA FLT #77 HIT THE PENTAGON... NO HOLE... NO WRECKAGE!

LOTS OF BROKEN WINDOWS AND DEBRI FROM THE BUILDING THRUST OUTWARD!

 


American Patriot Friends Network

"....a network of net workers...."

APFN Message Board

APFN Contents Page

APFN Home Page

History of ENVAX [internet]

Email: apfn@apfn.org

Hit Counter