There are NO Statutes of Limitations on the Crimes of Genocide!

 

Janet Reno on CNN 04/19/93

letter.tif (316124 bytes)

getacrobat.gif (1692 bytes)

Download Acrobat Reader here

A SUGGESTED MODEL for an INFORMATION pursuant to Rule 7, Fed.
Rules of Crim. Procedure suitable for institution of
CRIMINAL PROSECUTION
for violation of crimes presented herein
AND A REQUEST TO APPEAR BEFORE THE GRAND JURY TO
PRESENT THE FOLLOWING FACTS AND POINTS OF LAW
Persuant to Title 18 USC, Fed. Rules of Crim. Procedure, Section 1504
or in the alternative, for prosecution for War Crimes before an
INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL, THE INTERNATIONAL COURT. the HAGUE
http://www.apfn.org/pdf/genocide1.pdf   (5 pages)

DO NOT GO ANY FUTHER UNTIL YOU HAVE READ THE ABOVE FIVE PAGES!

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
http://www.apfn.org/pdf/genocide2.pdf   (20 pages)

Universal Declaration of Human Rights
http://www.apfn.org/pdf/genocide3.pdf   (7 pages)

Why WACO! "LET JUSTICE FINALLY BE DONE"
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/waco_justice.htm

While the sheep are sleeping, the predators move in.
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/sheep.htm

colorlin.gif (7770 bytes)

What is Genocide?

Definition of GENOCIDE - Main Entry: geno.cide
Pronunciation: 'je-n&-"sId
Function: noun
Date: 1944
: the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group
- geno.cid.al /"je-n&-'sI-d[^&]l/ adjective
http://www.yourdictionary.com/cgi-bin/mw.cgi

Genocide: Definition and Controversies

Genocide Convention 1948

The definitional article included in the 1948 convention stipulates:

Article II

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

The critical element is the presence of an "intent to destroy", which can be either "in whole or in part", groups defined in terms of nationality, ethnicity, race or religion. Thus, the imposition of restrictions during the nineteen-sixties and seventies on reproduction in India, through forced sterilization in many instances, or the continuing restrictions in China, do not constitute genocidal policies as the intent is to restrict the size of groups, not to destroy existing groups in whole or in part. Policies implemented during the Third Reich respecting Jewish, Roma and Sinti groups, on the other hand, were quite clearly genocidal in terms of this article as there was a clearly stated policy indicating the presence of an intent to destroy them.. Members of all these groups were processed in extermination camps, were subjected to serious bodily and mental harm, and had conditions inflicted upon them intended to bring about their physical destruction, including starvation in ghettoes, and had measures applied to them intended to prevent births within the group (sterilization).

Many experts, legal and academic, consider these criteria deficient in various respects. Some consider that the criteria are insufficiently broad. For instance, it excludes the physical destruction of certain sub-groups that have regularly been the victims of extensive killing programs. Usually mentioned in this context are members of political or social classes, such as the bourgeoisie, the middle classes, the Kulaks and the intelligentsia. Also, the definition focuses on the physical destruction of the group. There have been many instances in which the group has physically survived but its cultural distinctiveness has been eradicated. A contemporary example is the destruction of Tibetan culture by the Chinese, or that of indigenous tribes in certain countries in South America, Paraguay and Brazil, for instance.

These and other deficiencies need to be understood in the context of the background to the passage of this convention. The term genocide is of recent derivation; etymologically, it combines the Greek for group, tribe-genos, with the Latin for killing-cide. In 1933, at a time when neither the extensiveness nor character of the barbarous practices subsequently carried out under the auspices of the Third Reich could have been foreseen, the jurist Raphael Lemkin submitted to the International Conference for Unification of Criminal Law a proposal to declare the destruction of racial, religious or social collectivities a crime in international law. In 1944 he published a monograph, Axis Rule in Occupied Europe, in which he detailed the exterminatory and other practices and policies pursued by the Third Reich and its allies. He went on to argue the case for the international regulation of the "practice of extermination of nations and ethnic groups," a practice which he referred to now as genocide. Lemkin was also instrumental in lobbying United Nations officials and representatives to secure the passage of a resolution by the General Assembly affirming that "genocide is a crime under international law which the civilized world condemns, and for the commission of which principals and accomplices are punishable." The matter was referred for consideration to the UN Economic and Social Council, their deliberations culminating with the signing of the 1948 United Nations Convention on Genocide (UNCG).

There are considerable disagreements among experts concerning whether a specific complex of behaviours merits the designation genocide, even leaving aside clear-cut instances of attempts at moral appropriation of the concept. There are various reasons for this. First, like any other legal instrument, it was the outcome of negotiations between parties that held conflicting views as to the proper scope of its constituent parts. On this, see the analysis by Leo Kuper in his Genocide: Its Political Use in the Twentieth Century. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1981, Chapter 2. Although Article IX allows for disputes between parties to be adjudicated by the International Court of Justice, because accusations of genocide are invariable made by one state against another, this has never occurred. Consequently, there is no body of international law to clarify the parameters of the convention.

A second reason for uncertainty as to how the concept can be fitted to particular complexes of behaviour derives from the fact that the "ideal-typical" genocidal complex that Lemkin had in mind was the destruction of European Jewry. This instance of genocide was quite clearly also uppermost in the minds of those who drafted and negotiated the UNCG. Precisely because this particular instance was so central to the genesis of the UNCG, its application to other situations has been problematic. It is quite clear that the programs devised by the Nazi regime for the Final Solution of the Jewish Question lie at the extreme of any continuum of types of mass violence aimed at inflicting significant loss on members of particular groups, whether these be religious, national, ethnical or racial. Although the massacre of Armenians by the Turks during World War I, the destruction of the intelligentsia and others by the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia during 1975-1978, and the Ukrainian famine of the 1930s share some elements with the Nazi genocidal program, there are also important differences that call into question whether they meet the criteria specified by Article II of the UNCG.

[Source: S D Stein. "Genocide." In E Cashmore (ed.). Dictionary of Race and Ethnic Relations. Fourth Edition. London: Routledge, 1996]
http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/genocide/gendef.htm

============================================================================================

Social Scientists' Definitions of Genocide


Social scientists have different definitions of genocide from each other and from the definition in international law (the UN Genocide Convention) following. These differences are both because of the differences between generic concepts and legal definition (legal definitions are more specific), differences in purpose of the definer, and because of the political and group processes involved in drawing up an international convention.

For an analysis of the commonalities (and differences) among social scientific definitions, see Figures 1-5 in the essay by David Sallach, "Modelling Genocide".

Definitions of social scientists and historians
Frank Chalk and Kurt Jonassohn:
"Genocide is a form of one-sided mass killing in which a state or other authority intends to destroy a group, as that group and membership in it are defined by the perpetrator" (The History and Sociology of Genocide , 1990).

Israel W. Charny:
"Genocide in the generic sense is the mass killing of substantial numbers of human beings, when not in the course of military forces of an avowed enemy, under conditions of the essential defenselessness and helplessness of the victims". (in Genocide: Conceptual and Historical Dimensions ed. George Andreopoulos, 1994).

Helen Fein:
"Genocide is sustained purposeful action by a perpetrator to physically destroy a collectivity directly or indirectly, through interdiction of the biological and social reproduction of group members, sustained regardless of the surrender or lack of threat offered by the victim". (Genocide: A Sociological Perspective, 1993/1990).

Barbara Harff and Ted R. Gurr:
"By our definition, genocides and politicides are the promotion and execution of policies by a state or its agents which result in the deaths of a substantial portion of a group. The difference between genocides and politicides is in the characteristics by which members of the group are identified by the state. In genocides the victimized groups are defined primarily in terms of their communal characteristics, i.e., ethnicity, religion or nationality. In politicides the victim groups are defined primarily in terms of their hierarchical position or political opposition to the regime and dominant groups" ("Toward empirical theory of genocides and politicides," International Studies Quarterly 37, 3 [1988]).

Steven T. Katz:
"the concept of genocide applies only when there is an actualized intent, however successfully carried out, to physically destroy an entire group (as such a group is defined by the perpetrators)" (The Holocaust in Historical Perspective, Vol. 1, 1994).


United Nations Genocide Convention (in force 12 January 1951)

Article 2:
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately infliciting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

http://www.isg-ags.org/definitions/def_genocide.html

colorlin.gif (7770 bytes)

D. Stein mailto:Stuart.Stein@uwe.ac.uk
Punishment and Prevention of the Crime of Genocide
Sat Nov 3 18:46:29 2001

Convention on the Punishment and Prevention of the Crime of Genocide
http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/documents/gncnvntn.htm

The Contracting Parties,

Having considered the declaration made by the General Assembly of the United Nations in its resolution 96 (I) dated 11 December 1946 that genocide is a crime under international law, contrary to the spirit and aims of the United Nations and condemned by the civilized world,

Recognizing that at all periods of history genocide has inflicted great losses on humanity, and

Being convinced that, in order to liberate mankind from such an odious scourge, international co-operation is required,

Hereby agree as hereinafter provided:

Article I

The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish.

Article II

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its
physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article III

The following acts shall be punishable:

(a) Genocide;

(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;

(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;

(d ) Attempt to commit genocide;

(e) Complicity in genocide.

Article IV

Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals.

Article V

The Contracting Parties undertake to enact, in accordance with their respective Constitutions, the necessary legislation to give effect to the provisions of the present Convention, and, in particular, to provide effective penalties for persons guilty of genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III.

Article VI

Persons charged with genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III shall be tried by a competent tribunal of the State in the territory of which the act was committed, or by such international penal tribunal as may have jurisdiction with respect to those Contracting Parties which shall have accepted its jurisdiction.

Article VII

Genocide and the other acts enumerated in article III shall not be considered as political crimes for the purpose of extradition. The Contracting Parties pledge themselves in such cases to grant extradition in accordance with their laws and treaties in force.

Article VIII

Any Contracting Party may call upon the competent organs of the United Nations to take such action under the Charter of the United Nations as they consider appropriate for the prevention and suppression of acts of genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III.

Article IX

Disputes between the Contracting Parties relating to the interpretation, application or fulfilment of the present Convention, including those relating to the responsibility of a State for genocide or for any of the other acts enumerated in article III, shall be submitted to the International Court of Justice at the request of any of the parties to the dispute.

Article X

The present Convention, of which the Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish texts are equally authentic, shall bear the date of 9 December 1948.

Article XI

The present Convention shall be open until 31 December 1949 for signature on behalf of any Member of the United Nations and of any non-member State to which an invitation to sign has been addressed by the General Assembly. The present Convention shall be ratified, and the instruments of ratification shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
After 1 January 1950, the present Convention may be acceded to on behalf of any Member of the United Nations and of any non-member State which has received an invitation as aforesaid. Instruments of accession shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

Article XII

Any Contracting Party may at any time, by notification addressed to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, extend the application of the present Convention to all or any of the territories for the conduct of whose foreign relations that Contracting Party is responsible.

Article XIII

On the day when the first twenty instruments of ratification or accession have been deposited, the Secretary-General shall draw up a proc s-verbal and transmit a copy thereof to each Member of the United Nations and to each of the non-member States contemplated in article
XI.

The present Convention shall come into force on the ninetieth day following the date of deposit of the twentieth instrument of ratification or accession. Any ratification or accession effected, subsequent to the latter date shall become effective on the ninetieth day following the deposit of the instrument of ratification or accession.

Article XIV

The present Convention shall remain in effect for a period of ten years as from the date of its coming into force. It shall thereafter remain in force for successive periods of five years for such Contracting Parties as have not denounced it at least six months before the expiration of the current period. Denunciation shall be effected by a written notification addressed to the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

Article XV

If, as a result of denunciations, the number of Parties to the present Convention should become less than sixteen, the Convention shall cease to be in force as from the date on which the last of these denunciations shall become effective.

Article XVI

A request for the revision of the present Convention may be made at any time by any
Contracting Party by means of a notification in writing addressed to the Secretary-General. The General Assembly shall decide upon the steps, if any, to be taken in respect of such request.

Article XVII

The Secretary-General of the United Nations shall notify all Members of the United Nations and
the non-member States contemplated in article XI of the following:

(a) Signatures, ratifications and accessions received in accordance with article XI;

(b) Notifications received in accordance with article XII;

(c) The date upon which the present Convention comes into force in accordance
with article XIII;

(d) Denunciations received in accordance with article XIV;

(e) The abrogation of the Convention in accordance with article XV;

(f) Notifications received in accordance with article XVI.

Article XVIII

The original of the present Convention shall be deposited in the archives of the United Nations. A certified copy of the Convention shall be transmitted to each Member of the United Nations and to each of the non-member States contemplated in article XI.

Approved and proposed for signature and ratification or accession by General
Assembly resolution 260 A (III) of 9 December 1948

ENTRY INTO FORCE: 12 January 1951, under the terms of article XIII

Document compiled by Dr S D Stein
Last update 12/10/98
Stuart.Stein@uwe.ac.uk
ęS D Stein
==========================================================

http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/genocide/genocide.htm


War Crimes and Criminals
http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/genocide/war_criminals.htm


INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL, THE INTERNATIONAL COURT. the
HAGUE
http://www.apfn.org/pdf/genocide1.pdf (5 pages)

DO NOT GO ANY FUTHER UNTIL YOU HAVE READ THE ABOVE FIVE PAGES!

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
http://www.apfn.org/pdf/genocide2.pdf (20 pages)

Universal Declaration of Human Rights
http://www.apfn.org/pdf/genocide3.pdf (7 pages)

1230waco.jpg (11851 bytes)

 

littlegirl6.JPG (24138 bytes)    mother&child2.JPG (24571 bytes)     branch_baby7.gif (6819 bytes)   child11.JPG (25851 bytes)  

Only battered shells of the children remained....after the "rescuers" left..... at Waco

 CS gas was banned for use
against foreign enemies by
an international agreement in 1969.
But our government is free
to use it on their
own citizens
 Usage of CS gas, is considered
a "crime against humanity"
and is punishable by prison
and severe
 penalties.

FBI/BATF Use Lethal CS Gas Against the Branch Davidians

reno_b.jpg (8904 bytes)

Janet Reno gave her approval and admitted responsibility


Jack Thompson Exposes Reno at [IBT] Indianapolis Baptist Temple
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/IBT1.htm parts 1-4

Get Windows Media Player 7

Download free Windows Media Player 7 CLICK HERE

Inside Mount Carmel 03/08/93
http://www.apfn.org/Movies/Inside_Mt_Carmel.WMV

Hillary Rodham Clinton to visit Waco
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/hillary_visit.htm

The elites had to have the Branch Davidian Village eliminated because:
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/elites.htm

Cato Blasts Danforth Waco Report
http://www.vny.com/cf/News/upidetail.cfm?QID=175900

"Report: Clinton, Reno deceived public about Waco tragedy"
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/waco_report.htm

WHY_WACO I (under construction)
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/why_waco.htm

Inside Mount Carmel
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/inside.htm

APFN WACO Page
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/wacopg.htm

Why Waco?
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/whywaco.htm

More on Waco
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/moreon.htm

Hillary Directed Waco
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/hillary_waco.htm

WACO: Gunshot Evidence
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/gunshot.htm

Sarah Bain's Letter to District Court Judge Walter S. Smith, Jr.
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/sarah.htm

WACO SIEGE
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/wacosiege.htm

General Wesley Clark
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/clark.htm

The US military was at Waco
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/clark.htm

Former Waco Prosecutor Indicted
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/former.htm

WACO: UNNERSTALL FAX
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/unnerstall_fax.htm

Excerpts from Mt. Carmel, the Unseen Reality
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/mtcarmel.htm

WACO AND NANCY SINATRA + OTHER RABBIT TRAILS
http://www/apfn.org/apfn/nancy.htm

Mount Carmel A Day of Information
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/wacoinfo4-19-94.htm

WACO ~ One of the Biggest "Federal Lies" of All Time
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/wacolies.htm

Waco Trial Update 06/25/00
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/wacoupdate.htm

WACO TRIAL 07/14/2000
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/kangaroo.htm

WACO: INTERVIEW EXCERPTS: Dr. Nizam Peerwani
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/Peerwani.htm

Who Waco?
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/whowaco.htm

Who Waco! Probe Clinton's Ties To Riady to Rapoport to Why Waco!
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/ties.htm


FBI didn't plan to fight Waco fire
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/wacofire.htm

The Aftermath of Koresh's Waco
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/ID_main.htm

WACO: Files from APFN
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/rapoport.htm

WACO: GAO REPORT - DOD/FBI Ammo
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/waco_GAO.htm

Now the real Waco tragedy begins
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/realwaco.htm

Bring The Waco Murders To Justice! CLASS ACTION SUIT
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/CAS.htm

HOW CAN YOU BE 100% CERTAIN?
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/how.htm

WACO: HEY DANFORTH
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/danforth.htm

CRONY RIADY INVITES CLINTON TO JOIN LIPPO BOARD
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/riady.htm

Who Waco! Probe Clinton's Ties To Riady to Rapoport to Why Waco!
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/ties.htm

APFN Talks to the Enemy
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/enemy.htm 


Waco Whitewash
http://www.radio4all.org/pfp/wacowhit.htm


Waco Feb 28-April 19, 1993
http://www.indirect.com/www/dhardy/waco.html

WACO - MILITARY DOCUMENTS DESTROYED
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/waco_mil.htm

Mount Carmel
A Day of Information

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/wacoinfo4-19-94.htm

Waco Massacre Never Again!
Please take a moment to picture this...
http://www.wizardsofaz.com/waco/picturethis.html  


Mt. Carmel Center - April 19, 2001 Memorial

http://wizardsofaz.com/waco/4-19-2001.html

  APPOINTMENT WITH THE APOCALYPSE
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/appointment.asp

Gun Control
The Key to Genocide
http://www.goa-texas.org/kopel.htm

============================================

More on genocide.......

John Hammell

jham@iahf.com
Food Control: NWO Genocide Agenda
Sat Aug 4 18:54:48 2001


The annonymous person who theorizes that the "environmental" attack on Klamath Falls and on other agricultural centers in this country via the Endangered Species Act, and similar legislation is geared toward cutting off our access to food is entirely correct.

There is no question that we're facing down a totalitarian genocide agenda intended to destroy our farmers, so we can't be self sufficient on food, and they're trying to disarm us so we can't fight back or hunt.

Food control is the primary reason the UN's Codex Alimentarius Commission exists. I was kicked off the US Codex Delegation to the Committee on Nutrition and Food for Special Dietary Use by Beth Yetley of the FDA due to my efforts to expose her criminal wrong doing wherein the USA is being set up to lose in a WTO trade dispute that will, in the future, force us to harmonize our dietary supplement laws to a grossly restrictive international standard, or else face massive trade sanctions.

All of what I'm saying is documented at http://www.iahf.com A congressional oversight hearing on March 20 that could have exposed all of this was whitewashed despite my best efforts. I wasn't allowed to present testimony, and neither were any of our other people.

We're seeing a frightening level of pharmaceutical manipulation here, but it goes deeper than "just" that. There unquestionably IS a genocide agenda, and the UN's Codex Commission is trying to get control of the world's food supply, and also limit our access to healing nutrients.
They just don't want us living a long time, plays hob with the game. The bureaucrats prefer it if we just die when its convenient for THEM, after we turn 65, so they can get as much work out of us as possible, without having to pay us entitlements such as social security and medicare.

Through the Wild Lands project and legislation such as
HR 488, (A major land grab in the Northwestern states),*see http://thomas.loc.gov and enter HR 488- the NWO intends to drive as many people as possible out of the rural areas, and into the cities. This is a long established communist control mechanism. They attacked their own farmers in the Ukraine for the same reasons.

They don't want anyone living in the country growing their own food, being self sufficient and independent such people play hob with the game. The game is called genocide.

The ruling elite don't care how many of us "useless eaters" they kill off, they know they have the power to remain at the top of the heap regardless, and any of us who may survive would be made their slaves, to grow food for them..... unless we fight back! This is what we're up against- have NO illusions! This is about control.

This is about their effort to destroy America, to weaken us, to make us dependent on the UN for food. They're trying to break us, right now, and if we don't fight back with everything we have, we'll deserve our resulting slavery.

The ruling elite figure they can do away with borders now because they can implant microchips in all of us now and track us via satellite and via our purchases. They're going to attempt to force us into a cashless society. They can cause another stock market crash at will, any time they're ready. We need to gear up for self sufficiency, and we need to disseminate this information widely. Where there is no vision, the people perish.

We must all strive to defend our most basic cherished freedoms, and we must educate more people so they will stop being brainwashed and hypnotized by the evening news, we need to alert more people to the truth so that they will take stock in what is going on around them and help educate others. Go to http://www.iahf.com   and do some reading. Theres a lot of research there that will help you better understand all of this.

===================================================

APFN/Ken Vardon
PMB 107
6630 West Cactus #B107
Glendale, Arizona 85304

Click here to donate to APFN

Subscribe to apfn-1
chooser.gif (706373 bytes)
Powered by groups.yahoo.com

AMERICAN PATRIOT FRIENDS NETWORK

"...a network of net workers..."

Messageboard.gif (7833 bytes)

APFN Contents Page

APFN Home Page

Email: apfn@apfn.org

 

Hit Counter

Last updated 08/05/2010