Largest hoax perpetrated upon
the citizens of the United States in over 200 years.
Law Center Calls for Immediate Impeachment
DNA Prove's Obama is a Foreign Citizen and No Relation To Stanley Ann Dunham
Why I'm burning my last bridge with Obama
KING OBAMA: 'I Can Do Whatever I Want'
Obama’s new boast: ‘I can do whatever I want’
Mia Marie Pope Ousts Barack Obama as a Foreigner on the Manning Report
Published on Nov 6, 2013
Mia Marie Pope, who was a high school friend of Barack Obama (aka Barry Soetoro) in Hawaii during the 1970s, says that Obama identified himself as a foreigner in high school and was known as a crack-smoking homosexual.
Front row (left to right): Auma Obama (Barack's half-sister), Kezia Obama (Barack's stepmother), Sarah Hussein Onyango Obama (third wife of Barack's paternal grandfather), Zeituni Onyango (Barack's aunt)
Back row (left to right): Sayid Obama (Barack's uncle), Barack Obama, Abongo [Roy] Obama (Barack's half-brother), unidentified woman, Bernard Obama (Barack's half-brother), Abo Obama (Barack's half-brother).
The Mystery of Barack Obama Continues
Black Chamber of Commerce CEO on Obama: ‘I Had Hopes Because He
Was Black, Shame on Me’
Published on Aug 15, 2012 by OPSECTeam
Intelligence and Special Operations forces are
furious and frustrated at how President Obama and those in positions of
authority have exploited their service for political advantage. Countless
leaks, interviews and decisions by the Obama Administration and other
government officials have undermined the success of our Intelligence and
Special Operations forces and put future missions and personnel at risk.
The unwarranted and dangerous public disclosure of Special Forces Operations is so serious -- that for the first time ever -- former operators have agreed to risk their reputations and go 'on the record' in a special documentary titled "Dishonorable Disclosures." Its goal is to educate America about serious breaches of security and prevent them from ever happening again.
Use of military ranks, titles & photographs in uniform does not imply endorsement of the Dept of the Army or the Department of Defense. All individuals are no longer in active service with any federal agency or military service. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=X-Xfti7qtT0
Alex talks with filmmaker Joel Gilbert about his Dreams from My Real Father, a documentary that posits Obama's real father is was Frank Marshall Davis, a Communist Party USA propagandist who likely shaped Obama's world view during his formative years
by Aaron Klein (Author) , Brenda Elliott (Author)
GOCC - WHO IS BARACK OBAMA
Who is this man?
The Obama Chronicles
Rips 'biggest censorship blackout in the history of the United States'
Obama Protesting at Harvard in 1991
Breitbart's Bombshell Video?: Young Obama Speaks at Harvard ...
UPDATE: OBAMA’S KENYAN BIRTH RECORDS DISCOVERED IN BRITISH NATIONAL ARCHIVES
UPDATE: OBAMA'S NEW BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS A FRAUD:
Issued by the Whitehouse Wednesday April 27, 2011
Watch Obama's Birth Certificate a Fraud
Obama Birth Certificate Fraud
Obama Birth Certificate Scam? 2011-04-27 Obama
Obama Eligibility Activist LoneStar1776 Visited By Secret Service Agents
Wayne Madsen Gets Death Threats From The Obama Admin (04/13/2011)
BREAKING NEWS! We Told You So! Congressional Research Service CONFIRMS IT!
Obama's Crimes Against Liberty An Indictment of Pres. Barack Obama
Obama Bumper Sticker Removal Kit (BSRemoval.com) feat. Brad Stine
Billboard sign in Iowa
BREAKING NEWS! Hawaii Elections Official: Obama not born here! JUNE 10, 2010 - SMOKING
E-Verify 'Flags' Obama's Social Security Number
CBS NEWS: White House Party Crashers
Rothschild's Choice: Barack Obama and the Hidden Cabal Behind the Plot to Murder America
90 Minutes ~ DVD Only ~ $25.00 http://www.powerofprophecy.com/
complete Series Mon-Fri Pts 1 - 25 videos
Barack Obama Kenyan Birth Certificate / Lucas Smith / Coast Province General Hospital
eBay seller releases video of 'Obama birth certificate'
Click image for larger picture
Free Republic: Obama Kenyan Birth Certificate Surfaces? (UPDATED)
Hon. James David Manning, PhD continues speaking about the Patrick Henry style revolution. He also speaks about white people rioting and Larry Sinclair. This message comes from The Manning Report on Monday, 18 May 2009.
Obama, Ezkiel list of confessions:
Ezkiel Emanuel is the brother of Rahm Israael Emanuel And Son of a Well Know Israeli Terrorist
WTP Obama Citizenship Challenge - National Press Club, DC Dec. 8 2008
Story Barack Obama and the Media Do Not Want You To Know
Obama's Citizenship (October Surprise)
BARACK OBAMA: THE WOLF IN SHEEP'S CLOTHING
DID JESUS GIVE US THE NAME OF THE ANTICHRIST?
Barack Obama and the king's bling
AUDIO: "Yes We
Can!" President Elect Barack Obama
of the book Obama is reading is called:
The Post-American World, and it was written by a fellow Muslim.
"Post" America means the world After America!
UPDATE:GERMANY: Concert Before Obama's Berlin Speech?Tue Jul 29, 2008 15:53
PLEASE READ THIS AND THINK ABOUT IT.Wed Mar 5, 2008 10:36
PLEASE READ THIS AND THINK ABOUT IT.
We are witnessing a political phenomenon with Barack Obama of rare magnitude. His speeches have inspired millions and yet most of his followers have no idea of what he stands for except platitudes of "Change" or that he says he will be a “Uniter”. The power of speech from a charismatic person truly can be a powerful thing. Certainly Billy Graham had charisma and both his manner of speech and particularly the content changed millions. On the extreme other hand, the charisma of Adolph Hitler inspired millions and the results were catastrophic. Barack Obama certainly is no Hitler or a Billy Graham, but for many Americans out there feeling just like a surfer who might be ecstatic and euphoric while riding a tidal wave, the real story is what happens when it hits shore.
Just Some of What Defines Barack Obama:
· He voted against banning partial " birth abortion.
· He voted no on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions.
· Supports affirmative action in Colleges and Government.
· In 2001 he questioned harsh penalties for drug dealing.
· Says he will deal with street level drug dealing as minimum wage affair.
· Admitted marijuana and cocaine use in high school and in college.
· His religious convictions are very murky.
· He is willing to meet with Castro, Hugo Chavez, Kim Jung Il and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
· Has said that one of his first goals after being elected would be to have a conference with all Muslim nations.
· He opposed the Patriot Act.
· First bill he signed that was passed was campaign finance reform.
· Voted No on prohibiting law suits against gun manufacturers.
· Supports universal health-care.
· Voted yes on providing habeas corpus for Guantanamo detainees.
· Supports granting driver's licenses to illegal immigrants.
· Supports extending welfare to illegal immigrants.
· Voted yes on comprehensive immigration reform.
· Voted yes on allowing illegal aliens to participate in Social Security.
· Wants to make the minimum wage a "living wage".
· Voted with Democratic Party 96 percent of 251 votes.
· Is a big believer in the separation of church and state.
· Opposed to any efforts to Privatize Social Security and instead supports increasing the amount of tax paid.
· He voted No on repealing the Alternative Minimum Tax
· He voted No on repealing the "Death" Tax
· He wants to raise the Capital Gains Tax.
· Has repeatedly said the surge in Iraq has not succeeded.
· He is ranked as the most liberal Senator in the Senate today and that takes some doing.
If your political choices are consistent with Barack Obama’s and you think that his positions will bring America together or make it a better place, then you will probably enjoy the ride. If you are like most Americans that after examining what he stands for, are truly not in line with his record, it would be prudent to get off the wave or better yet, never get on, before it comes on shore and undermines the very foundations of this great Country. We have limited time to save the United States of America and the Supreme Court . Inaction is action.
Obama Bless America
By: J.J. Jackson
Wanted: Millions of adoring fans to follow presidential candidate to the end of the Earth and do whatever he says. Must be willing to obey without question and applaud at the drop of a hat. To apply contact the Barack Obama Campaign.
In a nutshell that is what the Obama Campaign is asking for and, by all indications, getting in terms of followers. And no, I’m not exaggerating.
Recently it has come to light that there seems to be a rash of people fainting in the presence of Obama at his rallies. This is something that often happens when people become so excited that they just can no longer take it. Maybe this is nothing to get too concerned about on its own, but when you couple this with many other bizarre occurrences? You get the impression of being at a religious revival at some mega church rather than a political event whenever Barack Obama is in the house.
When Barack Obama announced recently that he was going to simply blow his nose, the crowd went wild. Why? Is it because he had never been able to successfully do so before? Had all his previous attempts ended in embarrassing miscues? Like him placing the handkerchief to various other parts of his body only to result in mucus being blown all about? Were they happy that he finally got it right?
No. They were just excited to be in the presence of Barack Obama and will cheer at almost anything he says or does. Next week he will probably announce that he has to take a potty break and the crowd will go equally nuts over the announcement.
The only thing missing from the nose blowing incident was throngs of adoring followers rushing the stage in order to claim his discarded snot rag and wipe it on their face to bask in his glory. Perhaps even a claim of miraculous healing that resulted from touching his bodily fluids would have been a nice touch.
At these events you have people dangling perilously over railings and crying out about their love for Barack Obama. You have people crushing themselves upon barricades just to try and get close enough to touch him or even get a whiff of his cologne.
I thought we were electing a President and not the next American Idol. Heck, I wish it was only something akin to a silly television reality show. It’s looking more and more like we are preparing to elect the next messiah. Are messiah’s elected?
As the crowds of loyal followers continue to gather at his campaign events we are left with a growing impression that Barack Obama is not so much a man but a divine savior in the eyes of the masses. Or perhaps more accurately he could be described as the anti-Christ when you consider that his populist rhetoric breaks very important Commandments of the Christian faith such as not coveting what others have and not taking it from them without it being given to you. That’s ok though, because you will just be asked to keep believing that government confiscation under threat of force should you dissent is not really theft.
All this however is of minor concern for the crowds of adoring fans that gather around Barack Obama wherever he goes. They just want to bask in his glory. George Clooney, said of Obama that, “you want to follow him somewhere, anywhere,” which makes you wonder if Barack Obama said, “Hey George, jump off a bridge to prove your faith in me,” would he?
Halle Berry said the same thing. “I’ll do whatever he says to do,” she said even throwing out something that she would do specifically. “I’ll collect paper cups off the ground to make his pathway clear,” Ms. Berry gushed. Would she also place rose pedals on the ground so that his pure feet may not touch the dirt?
I hope that there are some things that she will not do for Obama. But then again she is from Hollywood. Do these Hollywood yummy brains ever really think about what they are saying and how silly they sound?
The who thing is all so very eerie. You almost expect to some time soon hear God Bless America rewritten as Obama Bless America and sung at these congregations. Maybe something like this:
Obama Bless America
Man that we love!
Stand beside us, and guide us
To Paradise with your light from above!
With Free Health Care,
And change for change sake,
Tax the vile rich,
And heal our souls!
Obama Bless America
He’ll bring us hope!
Obama Bless America
Sometimes I really, really, really wish I was making this sort of stuff up.
J.J. Jackson is a libertarian conservative author who has been writing about politics, America and in support of liberty since 1993. His weekly articles are available at Liberty Reborn. http://www.thelandofthefree.net:80/conservativeopinion/2008/02/22/obama-bless-america/
Jeremiah Wright God Bless America!OBAMA'S RACE SPEECH: INSULTING OUR INTELLIGENCEThu Mar 27, 2008 21:29
Talk Show Host Reveals Obama Connection to TerroristsSat Mar 22, 2008 11:41
Talk Show Host Reveals Obama Connection to Terrorists
There is a far-reaching scandal brewing for presidential
hopeful Sen. Barack Obama, thanks to a radio talk show host
based in Oregon. Syndicated talk host Laurie Roth's
revelations make the news story about Obama's relationship
with a racist, anti-American pastor look like child's play. A
top official at the Pentagon during former-President George
H. W. Bush's Administration and a former CIA intelligence
officer maintain that Barack Obama and former Weather
Underground honcho William Ayers funneled money to Professor
Rashid Khalidi, a known terrorist sympathizer.
Obama’s Records ProblemFri Mar 14, 2008 14:53Obama's Earmarks - $1 Million Michelle ObamaThu Mar 13, 2008 16:54
Michelle Obama's Writings Display Disturbing Racism
Americans must ask: 'Do we really want this woman in the White House'?
By Pat Shannan
Just what kind of "change" is Barack Obama offering and just how much influence has his wife, Michelle had over him in their married life the past two decades? It appears that Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama does not look into a crowd of Obama supporters and see Americans. She sees black people and white people, eternally conflicted with one another.
In her senior thesis at Princeton University, Michelle LaVaughn, the future wife of the Democratic presidential candidate, stated that America was a nation founded on "crime and hatred." Moreover, she stated that whites in America were "ineradicably racist."
The 1985 thesis, entitled Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community, was written under her maiden name, Michelle LaVaughn. Michelle Obama writes that the path she chose by attending Princeton would likely lead to her "further integration and/or assimilation into a white cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society, never becoming a full participant."
Not only does she see separate black and white societies in America, but emphatically elevates black over white in her world. As first lady, would she insist the White House be painted black? That's been a standard joke in this venue since the civil rights movement of the 1960s, but this next ominous quote from her thesis suggests that she would in fact urge her husband toward just such an extreme position.
"There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I am obligated to this community and will utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit the black community first and foremost."
She seems to justify those feelings with what she claims to see on the other side of the issue: "Predominantly white universities like Princeton are socially and academically designed to cater to the needs of the white students, comprising the bulk of their enrollments."
Michelle added in her thesis that to "whites at Princeton, it often seems as if, to them, [I] will always be black first." However, it was reported by a fellow black classmate, "if those 'whites at Princeton ' really saw Michelle as one who always would 'be black first,' it seems that she gave them that impression."
Michelle Obama's poll of black alumni concludes that other black former students at Princeton do not share her obsession with blackness. But rather than celebrate, she is horrified that black alumni identify with our common American culture more than they value the color of their skins.
"I hoped that these findings would help me conclude that despite the high degree of identification with whites as a result of the educational and occupational path that black Princeton alumni follow, the alumni would still maintain a certain level of identification with the black community. However, these findings do not support this possibility," she wrote.
Most black alumni ignored her racist questionnaire. Only 89 students responded, out of 400 who were asked for input.
The thesis provides a trove of Mrs. Obama's thoughts and world view seen through a race-based prism. For a potential first lady, this is a very divisive view that would do untold damage to race relations in this country in a Barack Hussein Obama administration.
During this presidential election year in which the term "transparency" has been frequently bandied about, candidates have buried a number of potentially revealing documents and papers. In Hillary Rodham Clinton's case, there's been a clamoring for tax records, White House memos and other material the candidate's team has chosen to keep from release.
The 96-page, 1985 Princeton thesis, restricted from release by the school's Mudd Library, has also been the subject of recent scrutiny. Commentator Jonah Goldberg remarked on National Review Online, "A
reader in the know informs me that Michelle Obama's thesis is unavailable until Nov. 5, 2008, at the Princeton library. I wonder why."
"Why a restricted thesis?" asked Pastor Louis Lapides on his website,
Thinking Outside the Blog. "Is the concern based on what's in the thesis? Will Michelle Obama appear to be too black for white America or not black enough for black America?"
Will an Obama administration really offer constructive "change" or just an intellectually refined racism?
Pat Shannan is the assistant editor of American Free Press. He has been working in the alternative news business for more than 30 years.
(Issue # 16, April 21, 2008)
Not Copyrighted. Readers can reprint and are free to redistribute - as long as full credit is given to American Free Press - 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 100 Washington, D.C. 20003
Stop Sen Obama's S.2433 - Forces U.S. to Give 'Til It HurtsSun Mar 9, 2008 13:19
Obama's women reveal his secretTue Feb 26, 2008 16:26
AMERICA IN SEARCH OF A LEADER
By Frosty Wooldridge
February 28, 2008
On November 4, 2008, Americans step into voting booths with two choices: Barack Obama will take us out of the Iraq War, but he will give amnesty to 20-30 million illegal aliens. In other words, he will legalize and give voting rights to an invading armada of people from a foreign country. Additionally, he will continue chain migration, 400,000 anchor babies and their mothers annually, diversity visas and double legal immigration from one to two million annually. That means America’s borders will suffer relentless immigration for another four years. Why? He already voted for exactly those items with S.B. 1639 in June of 2007.
John McCain promises to continue the Iraq War forever and he will give amnesty to 20-30 million illegal aliens. Additionally, he will continue chain migration, 400,000 anchor babies and their mothers annually, diversity visas and double legal immigration from one to two million annually. Again, that means America’s borders will be overrun for another four years. Why? He already voted for S.B. 1639 in June of 2007.
The PEW Report last week showed that immigration will grow the U.S. population by 138 million people in 40 years. Because of immigration, in forty years, 1 in 5 Americans will be foreign born. The Mexican population will triple—which means they will become the dominant ethnic group in America. Immigration displaces the American people right out of their own country.
Within 40 years, we shall have run out of our ability to provide water, energy and resources to an added 138 million people.
Bottom line: we are a country in search of a leader, but we won’t elect one that will address America’s most ominous dilemma: unrelenting, massive and unending immigration. Either man will accelerate it!
“What frustrates me more than anything is that people like you write all kinds of protests and people like me read and applaud your work...but yanno, it’s all just TALK!” said Barbara L., a frustrated reader of my columns.
When are we going to do something to stop it?
”It’s time to circle the wagons!” Barbara said. “Why isn’t anyone putting out the call to organize? There are hundreds of conservative groups out there, but they all seem independent of one another.
“When Paul Revere did his ride, people RESPONDED! It’s Revolution time! Ron Paul isn't giving up, God bless him, but how are we going to get him elected? I just hear/read a lot of rhetoric but no one seems to be doing anything!
“After a quick review or Orwell's '1984' last night... it all seems to be happening right under our noses, while we yip & yipe, but still go back to sleep! This is NOT the America of 1776! We have all become so fat, sassy & lazy, that we have no drive to survive!
”All I want to see is a PLAN. Come up with something we can DO. How do we stop this runaway train without bloodshed? I'm tired of all the whining.”
To Barbara and every frustrated American watching the disintegration of our nation, take heart! Patriots of the 21st century add their names daily to our cause.
You take action by joining these organizations below:
1. Join www.numbersusa.com with Roy Beck, Ann Manetes, Rosemary Jenks and their dedicated staff. At 550,000 members, this organization leads with millions of faxes and phone calls that have defeated the last 10 amnesty bills and more since 1999. It’s bi-partisan, informative, educational and powerful. I invite you to become the 1 millionth member, then, the 2 millionth member or 10 million member. The more that join magnifies our power in the halls of Congress. NumbersUSA became the principle player in the defeat of S.B. 1639 amnesty last June. Additionally, they defeated the Dream Act as well as the Ags Bill amnesty. Therefore, tell ten of your friends who tell ten of their friends to make Numbersusa.com the most powerful citizen advocate group on immigration. Send out Roy Beck’s “Bubble Gum Balls” 14 minute video demonstration to all your friends and their friends to educate them. The video graphically illustrates our population dilemma if we allow ourselves to add 100 million people via immigration.
2. Join www.fairus.org with Dan Stein for much of the same action.
3. Join www.firecoalition.com with Jason Mrochek for powerful action against employers of illegals, community action and more. www.wehirealiens.com helps you report illegals working.
4. Join www.alipac.us with William Gheen for powerful action on several fronts on illegal immigration. www.patriotunion.org with Xelan Bonn will bring you added impact and information. www.grassfire.org with Steve Elliot
5. Join www.carryingcapacity.org and www.balance.org with David Durham to show you what we face as to sheer population dilemmas.
How do we move toward THE plan?
1. We must stop massive, relentless and unending legal and illegal immigration into the United States before it turns us into an overpopulated quagmire.
2. We must push top TV media to interview national leaders like Governor Richard D. Lamm, Tom Tancredo, Dr. Albert Bartlett, Roy Beck, Terry Anderson, William Gheen, Jason Mrochek, David Durham, Dr. Diana Hull, Rosemary Jenks, Fred Elbel, Mike McGarry, Russell Pearce, Don Collins, David Pimental and others to speak on what we face.
3. We must create ‘critical mass’ of millions of active Americans involved at the local level in such numbers that we overcome the corporate elites plan to flood this country with unending immigration.
4. Call the candidates:
Ph. 703 469 2008
Ph. 703 418 2008
Ph. 866 675 2008
Next column: U.S. National Vision and Strategic Plan
Listen to Frosty Wooldridge on Tuesdays and Thursdays as he interviews top national leaders on his radio show “Connecting the Dots” at republicbroadcasting.org at 6:00 PM Mountain Time. Adjust tuning in to your time zone. He interviews Minutemen activist Jim Shaffer out of Denver, CO tonight, Thursday, February 28, 2008.
© 2008 Frosty Wooldridge - All Rights Reserved
obama and clinton both exposed as frauds
.....Bill & Hillary Clinton: Their Secret Life....
Judicial Watch Announces List of Washington’s “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians” for 2007
Washington, DC –Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today released its 2007 list of Washington’s “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians.” The list, in alphabetical order, includes:
1. Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY): In addition to her long and sordid ethics record, Senator Hillary Clinton took a lot of heat in 2007 – and rightly so – for blocking the release her official White House records. Many suspect these records contain a treasure trove of information related to her role in a number of serious Clinton-era scandals. Moreover, in March 2007, Judicial Watch filed an ethics complaint against Senator Clinton for filing false financial disclosure forms with the U.S. Senate (again). And Hillary’s top campaign contributor, Norman Hsu, was exposed as a felon and a fugitive from justice in 2007. Hsu pleaded guilt to one count of grand theft for defrauding investors as part of a multi-million dollar Ponzi scheme.
2. Rep. John Conyers (D-MI): Conyers reportedly repeatedly violated the law and House ethics rules, forcing his staff to serve as his personal servants, babysitters, valets and campaign workers while on the government payroll. While the House Ethics Committee investigated these allegations in 2006, and substantiated a number of the accusations against Conyers, the committee blamed the staff and required additional administrative record-keeping and employee training. Judicial Watch obtained documentation in 2007 from a former Conyers staffer that sheds new light on the activities and conduct on the part of the Michigan congressman, which appear to be at a minimum inappropriate and likely unlawful. Judicial Watch called on the Attorney General in 2007 to investigate the matter.
3. Senator Larry Craig (R-ID): In one of the most shocking scandals of 2007, Senator Craig was caught by police attempting to solicit sex in a Minneapolis International Airport men’s bathroom during the summer. Senator Craig reportedly “sent signals” to a police officer in an adjacent stall that he wanted to engage in sexual activity. When the police officer showed Craig his police identification under the bathroom stall divider and pointed toward the exit, the senator reportedly exclaimed 'No!'” When asked to produce identification, Craig presented police his U.S. Senate business card and said, “What do you think of that?” The power play didn’t work. Craig was arrested, charged and entered a guilty plea. Despite enormous pressure from his Republican colleagues to resign from the Senate, Craig refused.
4. Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA): As a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee's subcommittee on military construction, Feinstein reviewed military construction government contracts, some of which were ultimately awarded to URS Corporation and Perini, companies then owned by Feinstein's husband, Richard Blum. While the Pentagon ultimately awards military contracts, there is a reason for the review process. The Senate's subcommittee on Military Construction's approval carries weight. Sen. Feinstein, therefore, likely had influence over the decision making process. Senator Feinstein also attempted to undermine ethics reform in 2007, arguing in favor of a perk that allows members of Congress to book multiple airline flights and then cancel them without financial penalty. Judicial Watch’s investigation into this matter is ongoing.
5. Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R-NY): Giuliani came under fire in late 2007 after it was discovered the former New York mayor’s office “billed obscure city agencies for tens of thousands of dollars in security expenses amassed during the time when he was beginning an extramarital relationship with future wife Judith Nathan in the Hamptons…” ABC News also reported that Giuliani provided Nathan with a police vehicle and a city driver at taxpayer expense. All of this news came on the heels of the federal indictment on corruption charges of Giuliani’s former Police Chief and business partner Bernard Kerik, who pleaded guilty in 2006 to accepting a $165,000 bribe in the form of renovations to his Bronx apartment from a construction company attempting to land city contracts.
6. Governor Mike Huckabee (R-AR): Governor Huckabee enjoyed a meteoric rise in the polls in December 2007, which prompted a more thorough review of his ethics record. According to The Associated Press: “[Huckabee’s] career has also been colored by 14 ethics complaints and a volley of questions about his integrity, ranging from his management of campaign cash to his use of a nonprofit organization to subsidize his income to his destruction of state computer files on his way out of the governor’s office.” And what was Governor Huckabee’s response to these ethics allegations? Rather than cooperating with investigators, Huckabee sued the state ethics commission twice and attempted to shut the ethics process down.
7. I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby: Libby, former Chief of Staff to Vice President Dick Cheney, was sentenced to 30 months in prison and fined $250,000 for lying and obstructing the Valerie Plame CIA leak investigation. Libby was found guilty of four felonies -- two counts of perjury, one count of making false statements to the FBI and one count of obstructing justice – all serious crimes. Unfortunately, Libby was largely let off the hook. In an appalling lack of judgment, President Bush issued “Executive Clemency” to Libby and commuted the sentence.
8. Senator Barack Obama (D-IL): A “Dishonorable Mention” last year, Senator Obama moves onto the “ten most wanted” list in 2007. In 2006, it was discovered that Obama was involved in a suspicious real estate deal with an indicted political fundraiser, Antoin “Tony” Rezko. In 2007, more reports surfaced of deeper and suspicious business and political connections It was reported that just two months after he joined the Senate, Obama purchased $50,000 worth of stock in speculative companies whose major investors were his biggest campaign contributors. One of the companies was a biotech concern that benefited from legislation Obama pushed just two weeks after the senator purchased $5,000 of the company’s shares. Obama was also nabbed conducting campaign business in his Senate office, a violation of federal law.
9. Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA): House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who promised a new era of ethics enforcement in the House of Representatives, snuck a $25 million gift to her husband, Paul Pelosi, in a $15 billion Water Resources Development Act recently passed by Congress. The pet project involved renovating ports in Speaker Pelosi's home base of San Francisco. Pelosi just happens to own apartment buildings near the areas targeted for improvement, and will almost certainly experience a significant boost in property value as a result of Pelosi's earmark. Earlier in the year, Pelosi found herself in hot water for demanding access to a luxury Air Force jet to ferry the Speaker and her entourage back and forth from San Francisco non-stop, in unprecedented request which was wisely rejected by the Pentagon. And under Pelosi’s leadership, the House ethics process remains essentially shut down – which protects members in both parties from accountability.
10. Senator Harry Reid (D-NV): Over the last few years, Reid has been embroiled in a series of scandals that cast serious doubt on his credibility as a self-professed champion of government ethics, and 2007 was no different. According to The Los Angeles Times, over the last four years, Reid has used his influence in Washington to help a developer, Havey Whittemore, clear obstacles for a profitable real estate deal. As the project advanced, the Times reported, “Reid received tens of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from Whittemore.” Whittemore also hired one of Reid’s sons (Leif) as his personal lawyer and then promptly handed the junior Reid the responsibility of negotiating the real estate deal with federal officials. Leif Reid even called his father’s office to talk about how to obtain the proper EPA permits, a clear conflict of interest.
Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Judicial Watch neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office. For more information, visit www.judicialwatch.org.
December 10, 2007 | Posted in IndyBlog |
Obama Supports Homegrown Terrorism BillBy Jessica Lee, The IndypendentDemocratic presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama says that he will support the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act (S. 1959). According to the automatic email responses constituents are receiving from his office, Obama appears to be straddling the fence between preserving civil liberties and being tough on terrorism.
“The American people understand that new threats require flexible responses to keep them safe. They also insist that our responses to threats respect the constitution and do not violate the basic tenets of our democracy,” Obama’s email said. Several people who have written to Obama have posted his response on various blogs, including “Justin” who’s personal blog was picked up on diggs.com.
“I wrote Senator Obama (my senator from Illinois) about this act, which is now in a committee of his
(the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs).
I asked that he read the bill (not to insult his intelligence, but after the Patriot Act it appears this is a necessary request for most senators), and that he recognize the dire consequences that could result from its vague language,” Justin wrote Dec. 6 below the post of Obama’s email. “He’s quite eloquent, you’ve got to give him that. This act ‘includes provisions prohibiting the Department of Homeland Security’s efforts from violating civil rights and civil liberties of U.S. citizens.’ Didn’t we used to have something like that? What was it called? Oh right… The Constitution.”
The House version of the bill, H.R. 1955, passed Oct. 23 by a vote of 404-6 under the “suspension of the rules,” a provision that is available to quickly pass bills considered “non-controversial.”
Obama is on the 17-member Senate Committee for Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, where S. 1959 was introduced by Senator Susan Collins (R-Maine) Aug. 2. “I will keep your important comments in mind as I work with my colleagues on the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs. I will work to ensure that this legislation helps to achieve our domestic security objectives while protecting civil liberties and constitutional rights,” Obama stated in his email to Justin.
Many scholars, historians and civil liberties experts say they fear that the proposed bill will set the stage for future criminal legislation that be used against U.S.-based groups engaged in legal but unpopular political activism, ranging from political Islamists to animal-rights and environmental campaigners to radical right-wing organizations.
“This bill fits the pattern we are seeing coming out of Congress – both Republican and Democratic –
of a continued campaign of fear, which gets into heads of Americans that we now need to start criminalizing ideology,” said Alejandro Queral, executive director of the Northwest Constitutional Rights Center. He said he is very concerned about the bill’s vague definitions of “violent radicalization,” “homegrown terrorism,” and the terms within the definitions including “extremist belief system,” “violence” and “force.”
“What is an extremist belief system? Who defines this?” Queral questioned. “Planes flying into the World Trade Center is an extremist belief, but are anti-abortion activists extremists? Are individuals who liberate mink extremists? These are broad definitions that encompass so much, which need to rather be very narrowly tailored. It is criminalizing thought and ideology, rather than criminal activity.”
Jules Boykoff, an assistant professor of politics and government at Pacific University and author of Beyond Bullets: The Suppression of Dissent in the United States, told The Indypendent said he is concerned about how the government is broadening the definition of terrorism.
“Section 802 of the USA PATRIOT Act is a law that created a new brand of terrorists, the ‘domestic terrorist.’ Under this definition, the civil rights work Martin Luther King, Jr. did could have been construed as an act of ‘domestic terrorism,” Boykoff said.
In a Nov. 30 Common Dreams article, ‘Homegrown’ Suppression of Dissent,’ Boykoff provided a historical-based critique of who could be included under the umbrella definition of terrorism. “Even a cursory look backward through U.S. history reveals heroic figures who could be dubbed ‘violent radicals’ or ‘homegrown terrorists’ under the proposed bill, from U.S. revolutionaries like Sam Adams to gun-toting slavery abolitionists like John Brown to militant civil-rights organizers like Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Jr.”
Kamau Franklin, an attorney with the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), also expressed concern that H.R. 1955/S. 1959 will foster a legislative momentum on criminalizing a broad range of dissident voices. “The Commission’s broad mandate can lead to the ability to turn civil disobedience, a form of protest that is centuries old, into a terrorist act,” he said. “My biggest fear is that they [the commission] will call for some new criminal penalties and federal crimes,” says Franklin. “Activists are nervous about how the broad definitions could be used for criminalizing civil disobedience and squashing the momentum of the left.”
“It’s possible that someone who would have been charged with disorderly conduct or obstruction of governmental administration may soon be charged with a federal terrorist statute,” Franklin said.
Many activists and civil liberties advocates have expressed concern across the nation on blogs and radio shows about how the bill’s use of vaguely defined terms can be seen within a historical pattern of sweeping government repression of dissenting voices throughout the history of the United States where citizens have been targeted for their political beliefs. Two generations of Americans experienced first hand the two “Red Scares”(1917-1920 and 1940-50s)and the FBI’s secret Counter Intelligence Program, nicknamed COINTELPRO, which enabled the FBI to “expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize” domestic protest groups for “subversive activities” and “potential crimes.”
To many, the similarities between COINTELPRO and the bill are unsettling. The proposed legislation calls for the National Commission to “examine and report upon the facts and causes of violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism and ideologically based violence in the United States” in order to develop policy for “prevention, disruption and mitigation.” This investigation is needed, according to stated Congressional findings, due to possible threats to national security.
The secret program continued until it was discovered COINTELPRO was investigated by a U.S. Senate select committee on intelligence activities (commonly known as the Church Committee)which convened in 1975. The Church Committee found that from 1956 to 1971, “the Bureau conducted a sophisticated vigilante operation aimed squarely at preventing the exercise of First Amendment rights of speech and association, on the theory that preventing the growth of dangerous groups and the propagation of dangerous ideas would protect the national security and deter violence.”
In the last 30 years, significant evidence has surfaced about how the FBI and local law enforcement disrupted non-violent social and political movements, even “neutralizing” individuals through target assassinations. The secret program was vast, with agents monitoring and agitating people involved in the “New Left,” including anti-Vietnam War efforts, the civil rights movement, the Black Panthers, Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), the American Indian Movement, Puerto Rican independence groups, popular musicians and counter-cultural and revolutionary independent newspapers.
OTHER PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE VIEWS ON THE BILLDemocratic presidential hopeful Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) said that he believes the proposed bill is unconstitutional.
Speaking to a crowd of supporters in New York City Nov. 29, Kucinich took several questions from the audience, including my question asking why he voted against the bill. Kucinich was one of only six representatives to oppose the bill on Oct. 23.
“If you understand what his bill does, it really sets the stage for further criminalization of protest,” Kucinich said. “This is the way our democracy little, by little, by little, is being stripped away from us. This bill, I believe, is a clear violation of the first amendment.”
Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul was one of the 22 House members not present for the vote.A small demonstration against S. 1959 took place outside Senator Hillary Clinton’s office in New York City Dec. 10. Her office did not return an Indypendent’s call for comment.–Read Jessica Lee’s Nov. 16 article on HR 1955:“Bringing the War on Terrorism Home: Congress Considers How to ‘Disrupt’ Radical Movements in the United States.”Blog Update Dec. 2 — Kucinich Opposes H.R. 1955Blog Update Nov. 27 — Opposition to the Bill and how the Legislation would Target the InternetRead the proposed Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act:
Barack Obama: The Most Dangerous Man in AmericaPosted 10/23/2006 ET
Updated 10/23/2006 ET
If I were a liberal Democrat tasked with finding the ideal candidate to take back the White House in two years, I would try to find an extremely intelligent, well-educated individual with a fresh face, an articulate voice, a charming manner and no political baggage.
This person would be male and a member of a minority group. He would not yet be a household name, but would be in a position to become one. He would be in his forties, not unlike John F. Kennedy in 1960 or Bill Clinton in 1992. He would come across as the only candidate talking about new approaches to old problems. He would have the ability to get lots of press without appearing to crave the spotlight.
Most important to the liberal extremists who run the Democratic Party, this man’s moderate demeanor would successfully belie his leftist political ideology.
In short, this dream candidate would be exactly like Sen. Barack Obama (D.-Ill.).
Barack Obama is a savvy, charismatic, articulate liberal who could very well be the Democratic Party’s best hope for recapturing the White House. His background is intriguingly diverse. Born in Hawaii in 1961 to a black father and a white mother, his early education took place in the most densely populated Islamic country in the world, Indonesia. He holds an undergraduate degree from Columbia and a law degree from Harvard, where he was the first black president of the Harvard Law Review.
His impressive performance as a speaker at the 2004 Democratic National Convention made the party’s presidential nominee, John Kerry, seem dull by contrast.
In case you missed Obama’s flawless performance on “Meet the Press” (his performances are almost always flawless), his appearance will no doubt be lauded as “refreshingly frank,” and as “not politics as usual.” Asked by NBC’s Tim Russert to define what makes a great president, Obama said that a great president causes the people to think differently about their country. He then used two Republicans and a Democrat as his examples: Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan.
Barack Obama is the anti-Hillary Hillary. His positions on the issues of the day are every bit as radical and leftist as hers. The difference lies in his ability to sell it. In an age when political baggage can kill a candidate’s chances of success on the national stage, Hillary Clinton is dragging around overloaded steamer trunks filled with negative poll numbers. Obama is encumbered by no such weight. Should he decide to seek the presidency in 2008, he will have served as a U.S. senator for a mere four years, preceded by two terms as an Illinois state senator. Yet he comes across as wiser than his experience would suggest. He answers coyly to Russert’s question, “Are you ready to be president?”
“I don’t think anyone is ready to be president until he becomes president,” Obama replied.
Clearly, Obama is beginning to think he is ready. But let’s take a look at just where he stands on a few of the key issues.
Abortion: Barack Obama is a radical, pro-abortion liberal. He believes that American women should have an unfettered right to destroy the babies in their wombs at any stage and for any reason.
Gun control: Again, Obama is among the more extreme members of the U.S. Senate. In the last year, he has voted against shielding firearms manufacturers from lawsuits due to gun violence and in favor of legislation that would ban the sale or transfer of any and all semi-automatic firearms.
Health care: Obama has said he believes that health care is a basic human right. (Funny, I must have missed that one in the Bill of Rights.)
Immigration: As an Illinois state senator in 1998, Obama voted to give welfare and Medicaid to immigrants.
Judges: Obama voted against the nominations of both John Roberts and Samuel Alito to the U.S. Supreme Court, and participated in the filibuster of Alito.
National security: The junior senator from Illinois voted against reauthorization of the USA Patriot Act.
Obama is smart enough to dance around these votes should he decide to run for president, cloaking his liberal positions in resonable sounding rhetoric about a new generation with new ideas, etc., but he is also liberal enough to be the most dangerous man in America if he is elected.
Mr. Patton is a freelance columnist who has served as a political speechwriter and public policy adviser. His weekly columns are published in newspapers across the country and on selected Internet web sites, including The Conservative Voice and GOPUSA.com, where he is a senior writer and state editor. Readers may e-mail him at email@example.com.
Subject: 38 Senators Vote Against English
38 SENATORS VOTED TODAY (Oct. 27, 2006) AGAINST MAKING ENGLISH THE OFFICIAL LANGUAGE OF
HERE THEY ARE.
REMEMBER THIS THE DAY YOU VOTE.
n a message dated 5/24/2006 11:34:00 A.M. Central Daylight Time, firstname.lastname@example.org writes:Subject: SEND THIS TO EVERY ONE YOU KNOW
Grouped by Home State
THESE ARE THE SENATORS WHO VOTED TO GIVE ILLEGAL ALIENS SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS. REGARDLESS OF POLITICAL PARTY, THESE POLITICIANS NEED TO BE DEFEATED IN 2006, 2008 OR 2010 WHENEVER THEY COME UP FOR OFFICE. (McCain, Clinton & Obama voted "Yea")! SEND THIS TO ANYONE YOU KNOW IN ANY OF THE STATES LISTED. THE ENTIRE POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES NEED TO KNOW THIS INFORMATION. THAT IS UNLESS THEY DO NOT MIND SHARING THEIR SOCIAL SECURITY WITH FOREIGN WORKERS WHEN AMERICAN CITIZENS ARE BEING LEFT OUT.
Stevens (R-AK), Yea Arizona:
McCain (R-AZ), Yea Arkansas: Lincoln (D-AR), Yea Pryor (D-AR), Yea California: Boxer (D-CA), Yea Feinstein (D-CA), Yea Colorado:
Salazar (D-CO), Yea Connecticut: Dodd (D-CT), Yea Lieberman (D-CT), Yea Delaware: Biden (D-DE), Yea Carper (D-DE), Yea Florida: Martinez (R-FL), Yea
Hawaii: Akaka (D-HI), Yea Inouye (D-HI), Yea Idaho:
Illinois: Durbin (D-IL), Yea Obama (D-IL), Yea Indiana: Bayh (D-IN), Yea Lugar (R-IN), Yea Iowa:
Harkin (D-IA), Yea Kansas: Brownback (R-KS), Yea
Louisiana: Landrieu (D-LA), Yea
Maryland: Mikulski (D-MD), Yea Sarbanes (D-MD), Yea Massachusetts: Kennedy (D-MA), Yea Kerry (D-MA), Yea Michigan: Levin (D-MI), Yea Stabenow (D-MI), Yea Minnesota:
Montana: Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Nebraska: Hagel (R-NE), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Yea New Hampshire:
New Jersey: Lautenberg (D-NJ), Yea Menendez (D-NJ), Yea New Mexico: Bingaman (D-NM), Yea
New York: Clinton (D-NY), Yea Schumer (D-NY), Yea North Carolina:
Dorgan (D-ND), Yea Ohio: DeWine (R-OH), Yea Voinovich (R-OH), Yea Oklahoma:
Wyden (D-OR), Yea Pennsylvania:
Specter (R-PA), Yea Rhode Island: Chafee (R-RI), Yea Reed (D-RI), Yea South Carolina:
Graham (R-SC), Yea South Dakota: Johnson (D-SD), Yea
Vermont: Jeffords (I-VT), Yea Leahy (D-VT), Yea Virginia:
Washington: Cantwell (D-WA), Yea Murray (D-WA), Yea West Virginia:
Rockefeller (D-WV), Not Voting Wisconsin: Feingold (D-WI), Yea Kohl (D-WI), Yea Wyoming:
REMEMBER THIS THE DAY YOU VOTE.
LAST BUT NOT LEAST: Obama & Cheney are cousins!
Obama's 2009 Health Care Scam
Turns out Obama and Cheney have a common ancestor. Obama is Cheney's eighth cousin and Bush's eleventh cousin once removed. Coincidence Anyone?
Here it is! You be the Judge
MP3: C-SPAN TEN YEARS LATER... 9/11 COMISSIONS REPORTS
CRIMINAL IMPOSTOR WHO USURPED THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT SWORN IN,
American Patriot Friends Network
"...a network of Net workers..."
APFN IS NOT A BUSINESS
APFN IS SUPPORTED BY "FREE WILL" GIFT/DONATIONS
Without Justice, there is JUST_US!
Last updated 11/30/2014