APFN Petition Page

Petition to Abolish the H-1B Visa Program (update) [below]

[EMAIL ADDRESSES BELOW]

Layoffffs & Downsizing
2001-2002
. . Joe Smith started the day early, having set
his alarm clock (MADE IN JAPAN) for 6 am . . .
While his coffeepot (MADE IN CHINA) was perking . . .
he shaved with his electric razor (MADE IN HONG KONG).
He put on a dress shirt (MADE IN SRI LANKA),
designer jeans (MADE IN SINGAPORE),
and tennis shoes (MADE IN KOREA).
After cooking breakfast in his new electric skillet
(MADE IN INDIA), He sat down with his calculator
(MADE IN MEXICO),
to see how much he could spend today.
After setting his watch (MADE IN TAIWAN),
to the radio (MADE IN INDIA),
he got in his car (MADE IN GERMANY),
and continued his search for a good paying AMERICAN JOB !!!
At the end of yet another discouraging and fruitless day,
Joe decided to relax for a while.
He put on his sandals (MADE IN BRAZIL),
poured himself a glass of wine (MADE IN FRANCE),
and turned on his TV (MADE IN INDONESIA),
and wondered why he can't find a good paying job

( in AMERICA) !!!

 

Anti-U.N. Petitions Flood Capitol

More than 70,000 petitions urging the rejection of "all global governance schemes of the United Nations" were presented to Speaker of the House, Dennis Hastert, today (July 19, 2001) by the American Policy Center.

The petitions continue the Center's effort, begun in September 2000, when the American Policy Center (APC) presented Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX) with more than one ton of petitions in support of his "American Sovereignty Restoration Act" (H.R. 1146). The Center, headquartered in Herndon, Virginia, is an activist think tank.

A review of the voting records of the 435 members of the House of Representatives conducted by the Center revealed that 44% have failed to support legislation to protect America's national sovereignty. The subsequent petitions presented to Rep. Paul demonstrated the growing fear of Americans that the nation's sovereignty is in peril.

The new, additional petitions, said Tom DeWeese, the Center's president, call on the United States to withdraw the United States from the United Nations. "There is a growing consensus in our country that the United Nations is less concerned with world peace and more concerned with penetrating the sovereignty of the U.S. and other nations," said DeWeese in a letter to the Speaker.

"In light of our expulsion from the U.N. Human Rights Commission and International Narcotics Control Board, clearly the UN sees the U.S. as the biggest obstacle to its goals."

DeWeese noted that, at the same time of the APC September news conference, broadcast by C-Span, the U.N. was convening its Millennium Assembly. The U.N. Millennium Declaration, a product of the assembly, was put forth as a working blueprint for future United Nations' objectives. Among the Declaration's provisions were those that would:

  • Expand U.N. influence and power over the land of the United States, most notably through the use of environmental laws, World Heritage Site designations and biosphere reserves.
  • Register and track all small arms (rifles, handguns, etc.) produced worldwide, in an effort to implement a "global gun control" scheme, which would undoubtedly lead to gun confiscation from sovereign citizens.
  • Tax individual citizens of the U.S., directly, in the form of a "Tobin" tax, thus creating a global IRS.
  • Ratify the International Criminal Court (ICC) Treaty, creating a world court in which U.S. citizens and soldiers abroad could be tried unjustly in the name of political retribution. The ICC would even supersede the jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court.

In his letter to the Speaker of the House, DeWeese said "it is your unique obligation to make certain that the Constitution of the United States is upheld, not only by yourself, but by your colleagues as well.

"The objectives of the United Nations fly directly in the face of the principles on which our nation was founded, most notably, sovereignty and the inherent right to govern ourselves. We ask that you demonstrate courage and leadership in your responsibilities as Speaker and join us in working to protect our liberty and sovereignty."








End United Nations tyranny inside the U.S.

To:  Every American citizen

To: The Congress of the United States of America
From: Concerned American Citizens

We, the below-signed citizens of the United States believe that NOW, at the beginning of a new millennium, is the time for the United States to remove herself from membership in the United Nations and to physically remove the United Nations Organization, it buildings and its membership, from the United States of America.

We feel it is in violation of the Constitution of the United States to be signatories to a World Constitution or Charter such as that of the United Nations.

We feel that many, if not all, of the activities of the United Nations are in direct conflict with the American Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States. To cite a few examples:

GUN CONTROLS

The United States Constitution says plainly:

AMENDMENT II (1791)
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Yet, in no small part due to UN influence, the citizens of America find their RIGHT to keep and bear arms infringed, regulated, and acted upon under the color of law.

The following excerpts from an article: The United Nations: Pressing for U.S. Gun Control By the Executive Director, Gun Owners of America shows UN involvement in the internal affairs of the United States, which is clearly not legal ACCORDING TO THE UN’S OWN CHARTER AND BYLAWS.

Why should gun owners concern themselves with the United Nations? After all, what jurisdiction do U.N. bureaucrats have for sticking their nose into the U.S. gun control debate since the United States Constitution gives no authority of any kind to the U.N?

Clearly, gun control (or more plainly called civilian disarmament, which is what concerned the founders) is prohibited by the Second Amendment. In reality, the Second Amendment was specifically intended to protect an individual's right to own the type of firearms in "common use." Consider the statement by the Supreme Court in U.S. v. Miller (1939): "The Militia comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense... [and that] when called for service, these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time."

...The Constitution gives Congress no authority to enact gun control legislation.

Second, and perhaps even more surprising...the Constitution allows the Congress to require gun ownership.

Consider a law which Congress passed in 1792 -- a law which is clearly authorized by the "arming and disciplining the militia" clause in the Constitution:

In the Militia Act of 1792, the second Congress defined "militia of the United States" to include almost every free adult male in the United States. These persons were obligated by law to possess a [military-style] firearm and a minimum supply of ammunition and military equipment....

The above quote comes from a statement issued in 1982 by the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution. The subcommittee correctly observed that Congress can require gun ownership.

The documents from the U.N.'s own web page (http://www.un.org) make it clear that they are very serious about disarming American civilians.

On December 22, 1995, the UN announced the launch of a study of small arms. According to the U.N., small arms "are increasingly associated with crime, accidents and suicides, and form a major source of illicit profits for transnational criminal networks.... While trade in major weapons is on the decline, small arms are spreading."

This worldwide survey of firearms ownership is being financed by the Japanese government. The Canadian government is supplying a number of gun control bureaucrats to assist in the U.N. project. Also participating is Stewart Allen, Chief of the Intelligence Division of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms along with the Russian in charge of the Firearms Control Division of the Russian Ministry of the Interior.

The survey is being done, according to a December 22, 1995 press release from the U.N., in cooperation with U.S. police, customs and military services. The Clinton Administration evidently is hoping to use the U.N. study to lend support to its own desire to disarm American citizens.

Former U.N. Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali spoke of a world "awash" with small arms. The Japanese got the U.N. to approve a resolution authorizing the U.N. Crime Commission to consider various measures to regulate guns. Several of the member governments spoke of the "alarming rise in the proliferation of small arms and underscored that their mounting use by drug traffickers and criminal gangs posed a grave threat to public safety and the rule of law." The same sinister depiction of guns as only used by drug dealers is the same rhetoric employed in the U.S. by Handgun Control and their champions in the Congress and other government bodies.

An earlier draft of the resolution would have encouraged the U.N. Secretary-General "to continue efforts to curb the illicit circulation of small arms and to collect such arms in the affected States, with the support of the United Nations Regional Centre for Peace and Disarmament in Africa." While that resolution was dealing with Africa, Americans should not be relieved that the U.S. was not included -- in that resolution. The fact of the matter is, the U.N. is increasingly assuming the jurisdictional authority of a federal world government with the U.S. as just one of scores of member states. And gun control -- meaning civilian disarmament -- is high up on the agenda of the U.N.

With the end of the Cold War, the U.N. has shifted its focus to gun control and fighting drugs as a way of continuing to justify its existence. We see the same pattern of big government refocusing in the United States using the same themes of a war on drugs and gun control.

Gun control illustrates one of the dangers of the U.S. membership in the U.N.

LESS SOVEREIGNTY CAN LEAD TO MORE GUN CONTROL

The web of international organizations being spun around the United States has already begun to reveal a transfer of sovereignty from our national government to unelected, supra-national organizations. When the GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) Treaty was being adopted, proponents declared that treaty language would prohibit any part of the treaty from having effect if it would be inconsistent with any law of the United States. But other advocates, such as House Speaker Newt Gingrich, were more candid. He likened GATT to the Maastricht treaty governing much of Europe, by which individual states have surrendered an unprecedented degree of sovereignty. Gingrich said that we need "to be honest about the fact that we are transferring from the United States at a practical level significant authority to a new organization. This is a transformational moment." (Human Events, 11/25/94, p.4)

Another candid advocate of the GATT's transfer of sovereignty to the World Trade Organization (WTO) was William Holder, the Deputy General Counsel of the International Monetary Fund who told an American University audience on November 19, 1994: "The WTO is de jure [legally] world government."
That kind of fallacious and dangerous thinking has held sway in the United States, (and causes us to believe) that assumptions of international government power even worse than we have inflicted on ourselves domestically will be imposed on the United States by the U.N. and other "entangling alliances" that George Washington warned us against.

We have seen from the discussions at the United Nations that gun control is one of the top agenda items of the U.N. and many foreign nations. The U.S. gun laws are much freer than those of most of the rest of the world. Through the web of entangling treaties attaching the U.S. to various international organizations, the rope is being slipped about the neck of the Second Amendment.

One of these days, we may wake up to headlines that the U.N. or the WTO have demanded that the U.S. "harmonize" its gun laws (translation: disarm our civilians the way Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Idi Amin and many others have).

UNAUTHORIZED FEDERAL LAND GRABS

The Constitution says plainly in ARTICLE 1, SECTION 8, paragraph 17: The Congress shall have Power to : (17) To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may be, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the erection of forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful buildings:

Yet, under color of law and using illegal Presidential Directives and Executive Orders, land belonging to the sovereign people of the United States has been repeatedly seized and turned over to the United Nations.

In 1998, as if Congressional greed and stupidity weren't enough, America took place in a master environmental plan known as United Nations Agenda 21. About 450 delegates of governments, world environmental groups, universities and banks met in Rio de Janeiro to "map the future of mankind" through Agenda 21 which is also known as "Rio+5." The conference was a follow-up to the 1992 United Nations Earth Summit and spawned several treaties, each designed to destroy our national sovereignty under the guise of environmentalism.

One such treaty is the so-called Bio-diversity Treaty which calls for global eco-regions controlled by Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), which is nothing more than a code word for organizations under United Nations control.

Since 1978, without Congressional approval, 47 U.N. "Biosphere Reserves" have been established on 43,560,254 acres (68,863 sq. miles) of United States soil. Two designations of 'international status' by the United Nations currently take place with no need of congressional approval: UNESCO Biosphere Reserves and World Heritage Sites.

United Nations bureaucrats have the final say over acquisition of Biosphere reserves and World Heritage Sites, and no public hearings in the United States are required. Third world and communist dictatorships decide what goes on in Americans' backyards, and our elected officials have nothing to say about it. The United States part of the Biosphere reserve program is run by a committee of ten federal agencies, with no congressional direction or authorization. Biosphere reserves in 1998 contained a total land area larger than the State of Colorado.

The United States now has 20 World Heritage Sites, 18 of which are national parks and include the Statue of Liberty and Independence Hall. Over 68 percent of our national parks, preserves and monuments are currently designated at a United Nations World Heritage Site, Biosphere Reserve or both.

We are in this mess because Congress and the President have ignored two provisions of the Constitution. The first, Section Eight, Clause Seventeen of the Constitution limits federal ownership of land. The second, Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2, specifically designates Congress as the overseer of United States property and forbids federal, or any other takeover, of state land.

Yet President Clinton, who took an oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, was so in favor of bio-diversity and the United Nations and destroying United States sovereignty, he even called a United Nations environmental panel to support his decision to ban a gold mine near Yellowstone National Park. His decision to steal 1.7 million acres of Utah land and place it into Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument, was based in-part on his support of United Nations goals for land-use.

Our delegates to the Rio+5 conference signed the treaty, but to date, Congress has refused to ratify the agreement. If Congress ratifies the bio-diversity treaty, it will take precedence over the Constitution. So Clinton, using the weight and power of the Presidency, has been pressuring states to comply with the provisions of the un-signed treaty or lose federal funds.

Congress and the federal government have, under the pretense of law, seized or stolen millions of square miles of valuable land and even worse, much of it has been placed under the control of foreigners. While America was engrossed in arguments about various issues, such as the sex life of the president, he and the United Nations were busy stealing America. But that doesn't make it constitutional. Just calling an act legal doesn't make it legal.

The Constitution has never been amended to allow federal ownership of any lands other than originally authorized by the founding fathers. Nor does the Constitution allow foreign powers to assume control over American soil. We have surrendered, thanks to Clinton, sovereign rights to nearly 75 million acres of the some of the most beautiful parts of our nation – the giveaway was kept secret and we never fired a shot in our own defense. The 20 World Heritage Sites are: Wrangell-St. Elias National Park/Glacier Bay, Alaska; Olympic National Park, Washington; Redwood National Park, California; Yosemite National Park, California; Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming and Montana; Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona; Chaco National Historic Park, New Mexico; Cahokia Mounds Site, Illinois; Mammoth Cave National Park, New Mexico; Statue of Liberty, New York; Mesa Verde National Park, Colorado; Independence Hall, Pennsylvania; Monticello and the University of Virginia, Virginia; Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Tennessee; Everglades National Park, Florida; Pueblo de Taos, New Mexico; Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, Hawaii; Carlsbad Caverns National Park, New Mexico; Glacier National Park, Montana; and La Fortaleza and San Juan, Puerto Rico.

THE UN PROMOTES IMMORALITY AND THE HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA

America was founded by Christian men with Christian principals. Following are excerpts from the Declaration of Independence:

When in the course of human Events, it becomes necessary for one People to dissolve the Political Bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the Powers of the Earth, the separate and equal Station to which the Laws of Nature's God entitle them, a decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the Separation.

We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness – That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it

The United Nations, on the other hand, is a moral cesspool filled with perverts and fat cats. In 1993, the UN Economic and Social Council granted consultant status to the International Gay and Lesbian Association which includes the North American Man/Boy Love Association (advocates of child molestation) and the Dutch group Vereniging Martijn (which also promotes use of children as sex objects). In 1988, the top Belgian UN Children's Fund (UNICEF) official was one of a group convicted of running a child sex ring. Moral bankruptcy is commonplace in UN operations. In Zimbabwe, UNICEF-donated equipment helped terrorists seize power. In Vietnam, the Communists received $13 million from UNICEF while untold thousands of boat people fled for their lives. Fat cats? UN employees are paid 40% more than comparable U.S. workers and have subsidized rent. An ex-UNICEF official confirmed that "pampered and cosseted staffs" of various aid agencies "absorb 80% of all UN expenditures."

THE UN IS DESTRUCTIVE OF AND IS TRYING TO DESTROY THE U.S. MILITARY

The U.S. Constitution says, in ARTICLE 1, SECTION 8, beginning with paragraph 11:
Congress shall have the power to:
(11) To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
(12) To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
(13) To provide and maintain a Navy;
(14) To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
(15) To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
(16) To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress...

Yet the United Nations through various “peacekeeping” missions and disarmament hoaxes, has conspired, often with the willing help of traitors inside our own government, to weaken the United States Military through the introduction of homosexuals into the armed services, the “dumbing” down of recruits, demands they agree to serve under the United Nations flag and accept orders from United Nations commanders, in effect, placing the United States military might under the control of foreigners.

Whereas these above stated facts are in general print and available to all, and are therefore, generally accepted as fact, we the below-signed citizens of America feel it is un-American to maintain U.S. membership in the United Nations and plead, petition and beg Congress to remove the United States from its membership in that organization, and to remove all vestiges of the United Nations from the shores of the United States of America.
We hereby also demand that all land belonging to the citizens of the United States that has been seized improperly, illegally, and often secretly, be returned to its rightful owners, the individual states of the United States and the people, in accordance with the United States Constitution.
We further demand that all servicemen be required to swear an oath of allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and that oath include a provision that they will only serve American officers, in American units, and under the American Flag and that they will never follow an order to fire upon American citizens, regardless of the source of that order.

We remind you:
"It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the Government from falling into error."
U.S. Supreme Court in American Communications Association v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382, 442.

Sincerely,

The Undersigned     

View Current Signatures  

http://www.petitiononline.com/glg/

 

They are killing babies, taking your jobs,  poisioning your water, closing down churches and trying to keep good people out of office! What are you going to do about it? HERE IS A PLACE TO SOUND OFF!

Save The Children!

Pro-Life Petition:                                  mo2.jpg (47250 bytes)

Please sign this pro-life petition. You can also download this
petition and make hard copies for others in your community. Thank
You.

Sign petition at:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/914261793

Dear President

During your Presidential campaign, you often stated that you wanted to help America embrace a culture of life. Like millions of other Americans, I totally support you in that effort. Toward that end, I am calling on you to immediately:

  1. Appoint a Presidential Blue Ribbon Committee whose sole mission is to provide you with a pragmatic strategy (including an implementation plan) for promptly returning legal protection to every unborn child from the moment of conception. This panel should include attorneys, judges, legal scholars, and public officials who are committed to the pro-life position, as well as selected individuals from the nation's pro-life leadership.
  2. Implement a National Abortion Education Program designed to encourage more Americans to adopt the pro-life position. This campaign should consist of radio, television, and print advertising and be modeled after the government's efforts to eradicate illiteracy, smoking, drug use, violence, and racism.

Sign Petition at: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/914261793

===========================

Right of Petition -- key U.S. Supreme Court decisions summarized

Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88 (1940) -- The Supreme Court held that orderly union picketing that informs the public of the issues is protected by the constitutional freedom of speech and of the press and the right of petition and peaceable assembly and cannot be prosecuted under state loitering and picketing laws.

United States v. Harriss, 347 U.S. 612 (1954) -- The Supreme Court upheld the authority of Congress to require certain lobbyists to register.

Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 (1963) -- In an 8-to-1 decision the high court overturned the breach of the peace convictions of 180 black students who had peacefully marched to the state capitol to protest discrimination. The police stopped the demonstration and arrested the students because they were afraid that the 200-300 who gathered to watch the demonstration might cause a riot. The court held the state law unconstitutionally overbroad because it penalized the exercise of free speech, peaceable assembly, and the right of petition for a redress of grievances. A disorderly crowd, or the fear of one, cannot be used to stop a peaceful demonstration or cancel the right of peaceable assembly.

Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131 (1966) -- The Supreme Court reversed the convictions of five black individuals who participated in an orderly and peaceful sit-in at a local branch library to protest segregation at the library. The court protected their right of petition and freedom of assembly.

Brown v. Glines, 444 U.S. 348 (1980) -- The high court upheld the authority of military base commanders to require approval before military personnel can send a petition to members of Congress.

United States v. Grace, 461 U.S. 171 (1983) -- Congress tried to isolate the U.S. Supreme Court from demonstations or lobbying on the court steps. But the high court held that the acts of distributing leaflets and carrying picket signs on the public sidewalk around the building were protected by the First Amendment.

McDonald v. Smith, 472 U.S. 479 (1985) -- The Supreme Court unanimously held that statements made in a petition to the government are not entitled to greater consitutional protection than other First Amendment expressions. In letters written to President Reagan concerning someone being considered for U.S. attorney, the writer made false and derogatory statements. The letter writer was sued for libel. The writer pleaded that the Petition Clause of the First Amendment gave him immunity from prosecution. Wrong, said the court.

Walters v. National Association of Radiation Survivors, 473 U.S. 305 (1985) -- The U.S. Supreme Court held that a $10 limit on what a veteran can pay an attorney for representing him in pursuing claims with the Veterans Administration did not abridge the veteran's right to effectively petition the government.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Abortion is pre-meditated first-degree MURDER! 
Please sign the petition at:
 http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?BAN
Thank you!

To:  Americans-Against-Abortion [Petition]

National Women Of Freedom Awareness Council Of America
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
~†~ Urgent Request ~†~
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear America..."Just Say NO"...
---------------------------------------------------------------
As you may already know... The gruesome procedure known
as:..."Partial-Birth-Abortion" is performed over a three-day
period in the second or third trimester of pregnancy.
----------------------------------------------------------------
In this particular abortion technique... the physician delivers
all but the baby's head through the birth canal and then they
proceed to "STAB THE BABY" in the base of its skull with
curved scissors... and then they use a suction catheter to
remove the child's brain. Yes, this is the truth... The facts...
-----------------------------------------------------------------
AMERICA... This precious child has been robbed of any
chance for life... This procedure is wrong and immoral...
------------------------------------------------------------------
AMERICA... Partial-Birth-Abortion is one of the most
important "moral" issues of our day. Once again... we are,
as a nation... forced to evaluate our sense of right and
wrong. We believe that this issue will define who we are as
a nation.... and as a people.
--------------------------------------------------------
This procedure saddens many Americans... If you oppose
this "Partial-Birth-Abortion" procedure please sign our petition
and then contact your state and federal officials, president,
and news media "letters-to-the-editor". America... let your
voices be heard before election day and beyond. If you need
contact information please contact us and we will gladly get
that information back to you immediately. Take a stand America.
Let your voices be heard and counted as those against the use
of the procedure...."Partial-Birth-Abortions"...
-------------------------------------------------------------
AMERICA...Our nation has always placed a high priority on
protecting the most vulnerable in our society. Therefore it is
disgraceful that the American people would condone such a
deadly procudure which allows this to happen to babies who
are literally a few inches from full delivery and life.
--------------------------------------------------------------
*BAN-Partial-Birth-Abortions...
--------------------------------------------------------------
AMERICA...We must act to protect the least among us. Polls
have shown that a majority of the American people believe
that this procedure should be "Illegal"....
--------------------------------------------------------------
U.S.House & Senate Bill Clinton's Veto
--------------------------------------------------------------
AMERICA...President Clinton refuses to sign a bill to BAN
Partial-Birth-Abortions in our nation under God.
---------------------------------------------------------------
AMERICA...A criticism of this bill is that the Partial-Birth-
Abortion-Ban-Act does not contain a health exception for
"serious adverse health consequences."
----------------------------------------------------------------
AMERICA...The fact is... The procedure itself poses serious
risks to the mother's health and future fertility.
----------------------------------------------------------------
AMERICA...Partial-Birth-Abortions can cause serious health
problems such as an imcompetent cervix... serious infections...
perforation of the uterus... and hermorrhaging.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
AMERICA...A concensus in the medical community
considers the procedure as unnecessary and unethical.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The American Medical Association has said that the
procedure is "NEVER" medically necessary....
---------------------------------------------------------------
AMERICA...Even Dr. Haskell who invented the procedure,
has admitted "UNDER OATH" that the procedure is never
medically necessary to preserve a woman's health!!!....
---------------------------------------------------------------
AMERICA...As public support for outlawing this procedure
continues to grow... we are hopeful and confident that the
106th Congress will act to BAN this horrible procedure and
make the "PARTIAL-BIRTH-ABORTION-BAN-ACT"...
The Law Of Our Land..... God Bless America......
--------------------------------------------------------------
AMERICA...Thank you for reading our petition. We hope
and pray that you will agree to make this procedure illegal and
contact your congressman, state governor, news media,
newspapers and the president of the United States Of America.
--------------------------------------------------------------
*AMERICA...Remember To Vote In November...
--------------------------------------------------------------
Special Request: Please sign our other online petition...
MAA...Moms-Against-Abortion
Rally/March/January-22-2001/Washington,DC
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/MAA/petition.html  
---------------------------------------------------------------
Sincerely & Respectfully...Judith Natale/CEO/Founder
National Women Of Freedom Awareness Council Of America
National Headquarters/Northern California/Monterey/Siskiyou
Administrative Headquarters/Central Pennsylvania
3060 Rt. 405 Hwy./Muncy-PA-17756-8808/MaaJudith@aol.com
............Women Of Freedom @aol.com........

Sincerely,

The Undersigned

http://www.PetitionOnline.com/BAN/petition.html

 

National Online Chemtrail
Petition Debuts

From Lorie Kramer
seektress@ev1.net
2-5-01

Dear Jeff,
 
In our continuing journey to obtain information and accountability relative to the Chemtrail issue, another step has been taken by concerned Americans.
 
There is an online petition, authored by our friend, chemtrail researcher Clifford Carnicom, who has appeared on your program several times. We all have been most grateful for Clifford's dedication, and tremendous personal effort, in trying to get to the bottom of this issue. It is because of his integrity and courage, and that of his wife, that we have come as far into this quagmire as we have.
 
This online petition gives your listeners and site visitors the opportunity to take a stand in demanding answers to our legitimate questions from the duty bound officials of our government. We are entitled to know the answers, we are paying for the operation of these progams. The atmosphere they are tainting is what eventually gets into our own lungs, and that of our children. We have an investment in this, we have a right to know.
 
I encourage your listeners to review the petition below, titled "Ariel Chemtrail Spraying" on the "E-The People" petition website. Then, take a few minutes to fill out the form to be able to sign it. Currently there are 283 signatures. It is in the number three position of the most popular National petitions on the website.
 
http://www.e-thepeople.com
 
We are hoping as well, to utilize this petition to continue to educate about the Chemtrail issue. Our continued thanks go out to you, and your staff, for your continued support of the investigation into this worrisome campaign against our skies. Having Clifford Carnicom and others reporting about chemtrails on your program has assisted us in informing people that no, that's not water vapor over their heads, and we need to find out what IS over our heads. We have a right to know.
 
Sincerely,
 
Lorie Kramer
CACTUS TX,
Representative Chem Trail tracking USA, co-founder
 
 
Aerial Chemtrail Spraying
 
I, the undersigned, petition my Congress to hold an open hearing on aerial chemtrail spraying. As a concerned citizen of The United States, I demand disclosure explaining the truth behind the ongoing chemical, biological or other toxic aerial sprayings occurring over the United States and other countries, cessation of aerial spraying upon U.S. citizens, and enforcement of existing Federal law prohibiting experimentation upon U.S. citizens without informed consent and permission. I have directly witnessed these sprayings.
 
The following websites are essential for your review:
Contrails Frenzmail and Chemtrailtrackingusa
 
This petition was initiated by Clifford Carnicom and C.A.C.T.U.S.
(Citizens Against Chemtrails U.S.). Permission to use, modify, copy and distribute is given to any interested organization or individual. When this or similar petition is completed, please mail to:

Clifford Carnicom
P. O. Box 4653
Sante Fe, NM 87502

All petitions will be organized for presentation to the Congress of the United States.
http://www.rense.com/general7/natonlinechem.htm

End United Nations tyranny inside the U.S. Petition:

To:  Every American citizen

To: The Congress of the United States of America
From: Concerned American Citizens

We, the below-signed citizens of the United States believe that NOW, at the beginning of a new millennium, is the time for the United States to remove herself from membership in the United Nations and to physically remove the United Nations Organization, it buildings and its membership, from the United States of America.

We feel it is in violation of the Constitution of the United States to be signatories to a World Constitution or Charter such as that of the United Nations.

We feel that many, if not all, of the activities of the United Nations are in direct conflict with the American Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States. To cite a few examples:

GUN CONTROLS

The United States Constitution says plainly:

AMENDMENT II (1791)
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Yet, in no small part due to UN influence, the citizens of America find their RIGHT to keep and bear arms infringed, regulated, and acted upon under the color of law.

The following excerpts from an article: The United Nations: Pressing for U.S. Gun Control By the Executive Director, Gun Owners of America shows UN involvement in the internal affairs of the United States, which is clearly not legal ACCORDING TO THE UN’S OWN CHARTER AND BYLAWS.

Why should gun owners concern themselves with the United Nations? After all, what jurisdiction do U.N. bureaucrats have for sticking their nose into the U.S. gun control debate since the United States Constitution gives no authority of any kind to the U.N?

Clearly, gun control (or more plainly called civilian disarmament, which is what concerned the founders) is prohibited by the Second Amendment. In reality, the Second Amendment was specifically intended to protect an individual's right to own the type of firearms in "common use." Consider the statement by the Supreme Court in U.S. v. Miller (1939): "The Militia comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense... [and that] when called for service, these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time."

...The Constitution gives Congress no authority to enact gun control legislation.

Second, and perhaps even more surprising...the Constitution allows the Congress to require gun ownership.

Consider a law which Congress passed in 1792 -- a law which is clearly authorized by the "arming and disciplining the militia" clause in the Constitution:

In the Militia Act of 1792, the second Congress defined "militia of the United States" to include almost every free adult male in the United States. These persons were obligated by law to possess a [military-style] firearm and a minimum supply of ammunition and military equipment....

The above quote comes from a statement issued in 1982 by the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution. The subcommittee correctly observed that Congress can require gun ownership.

The documents from the U.N.'s own web page (http://www.un.org) make it clear that they are very serious about disarming American civilians.

On December 22, 1995, the UN announced the launch of a study of small arms. According to the U.N., small arms "are increasingly associated with crime, accidents and suicides, and form a major source of illicit profits for transnational criminal networks.... While trade in major weapons is on the decline, small arms are spreading."

This worldwide survey of firearms ownership is being financed by the Japanese government. The Canadian government is supplying a number of gun control bureaucrats to assist in the U.N. project. Also participating is Stewart Allen, Chief of the Intelligence Division of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms along with the Russian in charge of the Firearms Control Division of the Russian Ministry of the Interior.

The survey is being done, according to a December 22, 1995 press release from the U.N., in cooperation with U.S. police, customs and military services. The Clinton Administration evidently is hoping to use the U.N. study to lend support to its own desire to disarm American citizens.

Former U.N. Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali spoke of a world "awash" with small arms. The Japanese got the U.N. to approve a resolution authorizing the U.N. Crime Commission to consider various measures to regulate guns. Several of the member governments spoke of the "alarming rise in the proliferation of small arms and underscored that their mounting use by drug traffickers and criminal gangs posed a grave threat to public safety and the rule of law." The same sinister depiction of guns as only used by drug dealers is the same rhetoric employed in the U.S. by Handgun Control and their champions in the Congress and other government bodies.

An earlier draft of the resolution would have encouraged the U.N. Secretary-General "to continue efforts to curb the illicit circulation of small arms and to collect such arms in the affected States, with the support of the United Nations Regional Centre for Peace and Disarmament in Africa." While that resolution was dealing with Africa, Americans should not be relieved that the U.S. was not included -- in that resolution. The fact of the matter is, the U.N. is increasingly assuming the jurisdictional authority of a federal world government with the U.S. as just one of scores of member states. And gun control -- meaning civilian disarmament -- is high up on the agenda of the U.N.

With the end of the Cold War, the U.N. has shifted its focus to gun control and fighting drugs as a way of continuing to justify its existence. We see the same pattern of big government refocusing in the United States using the same themes of a war on drugs and gun control.

Gun control illustrates one of the dangers of the U.S. membership in the U.N.

LESS SOVEREIGNTY CAN LEAD TO MORE GUN CONTROL

The web of international organizations being spun around the United States has already begun to reveal a transfer of sovereignty from our national government to unelected, supra-national organizations. When the GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) Treaty was being adopted, proponents declared that treaty language would prohibit any part of the treaty from having effect if it would be inconsistent with any law of the United States. But other advocates, such as House Speaker Newt Gingrich, were more candid. He likened GATT to the Maastricht treaty governing much of Europe, by which individual states have surrendered an unprecedented degree of sovereignty. Gingrich said that we need "to be honest about the fact that we are transferring from the United States at a practical level significant authority to a new organization. This is a transformational moment." (Human Events, 11/25/94, p.4)

Another candid advocate of the GATT's transfer of sovereignty to the World Trade Organization (WTO) was William Holder, the Deputy General Counsel of the International Monetary Fund who told an American University audience on November 19, 1994: "The WTO is de jure [legally] world government."
That kind of fallacious and dangerous thinking has held sway in the United States, (and causes us to believe) that assumptions of international government power even worse than we have inflicted on ourselves domestically will be imposed on the United States by the U.N. and other "entangling alliances" that George Washington warned us against.

We have seen from the discussions at the United Nations that gun control is one of the top agenda items of the U.N. and many foreign nations. The U.S. gun laws are much freer than those of most of the rest of the world. Through the web of entangling treaties attaching the U.S. to various international organizations, the rope is being slipped about the neck of the Second Amendment.

One of these days, we may wake up to headlines that the U.N. or the WTO have demanded that the U.S. "harmonize" its gun laws (translation: disarm our civilians the way Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Idi Amin and many others have).

UNAUTHORIZED FEDERAL LAND GRABS

The Constitution says plainly in ARTICLE 1, SECTION 8, paragraph 17: The Congress shall have Power to : (17) To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may be, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the erection of forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful buildings:

Yet, under color of law and using illegal Presidential Directives and Executive Orders, land belonging to the sovereign people of the United States has been repeatedly seized and turned over to the United Nations.

In 1998, as if Congressional greed and stupidity weren't enough, America took place in a master environmental plan known as United Nations Agenda 21. About 450 delegates of governments, world environmental groups, universities and banks met in Rio de Janeiro to "map the future of mankind" through Agenda 21 which is also known as "Rio+5." The conference was a follow-up to the 1992 United Nations Earth Summit and spawned several treaties, each designed to destroy our national sovereignty under the guise of environmentalism.

One such treaty is the so-called Bio-diversity Treaty which calls for global eco-regions controlled by Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), which is nothing more than a code word for organizations under United Nations control.

Since 1978, without Congressional approval, 47 U.N. "Biosphere Reserves" have been established on 43,560,254 acres (68,863 sq. miles) of United States soil. Two designations of 'international status' by the United Nations currently take place with no need of congressional approval: UNESCO Biosphere Reserves and World Heritage Sites.

United Nations bureaucrats have the final say over acquisition of Biosphere reserves and World Heritage Sites, and no public hearings in the United States are required. Third world and communist dictatorships decide what goes on in Americans' backyards, and our elected officials have nothing to say about it. The United States part of the Biosphere reserve program is run by a committee of ten federal agencies, with no congressional direction or authorization. Biosphere reserves in 1998 contained a total land area larger than the State of Colorado.

The United States now has 20 World Heritage Sites, 18 of which are national parks and include the Statue of Liberty and Independence Hall. Over 68 percent of our national parks, preserves and monuments are currently designated at a United Nations World Heritage Site, Biosphere Reserve or both.

We are in this mess because Congress and the President have ignored two provisions of the Constitution. The first, Section Eight, Clause Seventeen of the Constitution limits federal ownership of land. The second, Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2, specifically designates Congress as the overseer of United States property and forbids federal, or any other takeover, of state land.

Yet President Clinton, who took an oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, was so in favor of bio-diversity and the United Nations and destroying United States sovereignty, he even called a United Nations environmental panel to support his decision to ban a gold mine near Yellowstone National Park. His decision to steal 1.7 million acres of Utah land and place it into Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument, was based in-part on his support of United Nations goals for land-use.

Our delegates to the Rio+5 conference signed the treaty, but to date, Congress has refused to ratify the agreement. If Congress ratifies the bio-diversity treaty, it will take precedence over the Constitution. So Clinton, using the weight and power of the Presidency, has been pressuring states to comply with the provisions of the un-signed treaty or lose federal funds.

Congress and the federal government have, under the pretense of law, seized or stolen millions of square miles of valuable land and even worse, much of it has been placed under the control of foreigners. While America was engrossed in arguments about various issues, such as the sex life of the president, he and the United Nations were busy stealing America. But that doesn't make it constitutional. Just calling an act legal doesn't make it legal.

The Constitution has never been amended to allow federal ownership of any lands other than originally authorized by the founding fathers. Nor does the Constitution allow foreign powers to assume control over American soil. We have surrendered, thanks to Clinton, sovereign rights to nearly 75 million acres of the some of the most beautiful parts of our nation – the giveaway was kept secret and we never fired a shot in our own defense. The 20 World Heritage Sites are: Wrangell-St. Elias National Park/Glacier Bay, Alaska; Olympic National Park, Washington; Redwood National Park, California; Yosemite National Park, California; Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming and Montana; Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona; Chaco National Historic Park, New Mexico; Cahokia Mounds Site, Illinois; Mammoth Cave National Park, New Mexico; Statue of Liberty, New York; Mesa Verde National Park, Colorado; Independence Hall, Pennsylvania; Monticello and the University of Virginia, Virginia; Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Tennessee; Everglades National Park, Florida; Pueblo de Taos, New Mexico; Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, Hawaii; Carlsbad Caverns National Park, New Mexico; Glacier National Park, Montana; and La Fortaleza and San Juan, Puerto Rico.

THE UN PROMOTES IMMORALITY AND THE HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA

America was founded by Christian men with Christian principals. Following are excerpts from the Declaration of Independence:

When in the course of human Events, it becomes necessary for one People to dissolve the Political Bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the Powers of the Earth, the separate and equal Station to which the Laws of Nature's God entitle them, a decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the Separation.

We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness – That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it

The United Nations, on the other hand, is a moral cesspool filled with perverts and fat cats. In 1993, the UN Economic and Social Council granted consultant status to the International Gay and Lesbian Association which includes the North American Man/Boy Love Association (advocates of child molestation) and the Dutch group Vereniging Martijn (which also promotes use of children as sex objects). In 1988, the top Belgian UN Children's Fund (UNICEF) official was one of a group convicted of running a child sex ring. Moral bankruptcy is commonplace in UN operations. In Zimbabwe, UNICEF-donated equipment helped terrorists seize power. In Vietnam, the Communists received $13 million from UNICEF while untold thousands of boat people fled for their lives. Fat cats? UN employees are paid 40% more than comparable U.S. workers and have subsidized rent. An ex-UNICEF official confirmed that "pampered and cosseted staffs" of various aid agencies "absorb 80% of all UN expenditures."

THE UN IS DESTRUCTIVE OF AND IS TRYING TO DESTROY THE U.S. MILITARY

The U.S. Constitution says, in ARTICLE 1, SECTION 8, beginning with paragraph 11:
Congress shall have the power to:
(11) To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
(12) To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
(13) To provide and maintain a Navy;
(14) To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
(15) To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
(16) To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress...

Yet the United Nations through various “peacekeeping” missions and disarmament hoaxes, has conspired, often with the willing help of traitors inside our own government, to weaken the United States Military through the introduction of homosexuals into the armed services, the “dumbing” down of recruits, demands they agree to serve under the United Nations flag and accept orders from United Nations commanders, in effect, placing the United States military might under the control of foreigners.

Whereas these above stated facts are in general print and available to all, and are therefore, generally accepted as fact, we the below-signed citizens of America feel it is un-American to maintain U.S. membership in the United Nations and plead, petition and beg Congress to remove the United States from its membership in that organization, and to remove all vestiges of the United Nations from the shores of the United States of America.
We hereby also demand that all land belonging to the citizens of the United States that has been seized improperly, illegally, and often secretly, be returned to its rightful owners, the individual states of the United States and the people, in accordance with the United States Constitution.
We further demand that all servicemen be required to swear an oath of allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and that oath include a provision that they will only serve American officers, in American units, and under the American Flag and that they will never follow an order to fire upon American citizens, regardless of the source of that order.

We remind you:
"It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the Government from falling into error."
U.S. Supreme Court in American Communications Association v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382, 442.

Sincerely,

The Undersigned

http://www.petitiononline.com/glg/petition.html

 

International Criminal Court Petition

 

Dear President Bush:

Please rescind the signature of the United States of America to the International Criminal Court treaty that former President Clinton authorized on December 31, 2000. 

Sincerely,

http://www.thelibertycommittee.org/icc_petition_online.htm  

 

PETITION FOR AN OVERSIGHT HEARING
ON THE CODEX VITAMIN ISSUE & TO STOP THE EU VITAMIN DIRECTIVE

To: Representative Dan Burton,
      Chairman of the House Government Reform and Oversight Committee

We urge you to consider the information presented in the document, Health Freedom is Under Attack, as well as petitions, calls, letters and other communications pleading for Oversight on the Codex Vitamin Issue.

Americans value their right to obtain dietary supplements.  In 1994, more Americans contacted Congress than ever before when they called, faxed, emailed and wrote about their support for the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act.  Now this right is threatened and we must plead for the protection of our domestic vitamin laws from harmonization to a more restrictive international standard.

Our concern is real.  Congress has already capitulated to harmonization when the World Trade Organizations Dispute Settlement Body threatened the U.S. with trade sanctions.  This clearly confirmed that we cannot rely upon any alleged protection by US Statute.  We need Oversight immediately to safeguard such sovereign laws as the Proxmire Vitamin Act of '76 and the DSHEA Act of 1994.

We are urging our Senators and Representatives to cosponsor the American Sovereignty Restoration Act to remove the USA from the World Trade Organization. We ask you to cosponsor this as well.

We fear that if you wait to see what happens in Europe before acting, it will be too late.  Please hold a hearing on this matter as soon as possible.

http://www.lef.org/magazine/mag99/apr99-codexltr.html

###

Reform the Veterans Administration System! Petition:

To:  President George W. Bush, Congress and House/Senate VA Committees

"The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war, no matter how justified, shall be directly proportional as to how they perceive the veterans of earlier wars were treated and appreciated by their nation." --George Washington

It is time for the archaic VA system to undergo a major overhaul. Veteran’s rights are non-existent. We demand the right to access the federal court system as well as to have the right to secure representation without limits the VA now restricts us to. The laws that prohibit the payment and use of legal counsel in our claims process severely cripples the Veterans Right to “due process under the law”. This law clearly violates the civil rights of Veterans. We as Veterans want a fair and just system that affords us all the civil and judicial rights and freedoms enjoyed by the rest of the population. We do not currently have access or the privilege to such a system. We are not only denied such access, but the US Attorney, Civil Rights Division, fails to investigate Veterans civil complaints regarding the Department of Veterans Affairs. We are told (unofficially of course) that the US Attorney is the VA’s Attorney, yet when another citizen has their civil rights violated, the Justice Department gladly steps in. We are asking for our right to “due process” under the laws and the Constitution we swore to defend.

It is the demand of the following undersigned Veterans, Family members and Friends of Veterans, that the Congress enacts legislation that restructures the VA claims and Medical care process to allow the following changes.

1. The timely and fair adjudication of Veterans claims for compensation, without prejudice or malice.

2. Legal representation at all stages of the Veterans claims process. Removal of all restraints that prohibit the hiring and payment of private legal counsel necessary to prove the Veterans case.

3. Access to the Federal Court System closely mirroring the same guidelines as the Social Security claims process. This is to include the adoption of time limits and right to counsel policies that are currently in use by the Social Security Administration.

4. An end to the practice of 'Blanket Denial" of administrative tort claims that are filed as a result of injury at VA Medical Facilities. The Department of Veterans Affairs shall be held accountable in Civil Court for the actions and malpractice of its employees and Administrators.

5. The addition of oversight committees that are responsible for the investigation of Veterans Claims of injury and malpractice at VA Medical Facilities. These committees shall be composed of Veterans, Non VA Physicians and Non VA Lawyers. This will help curtail the practice of complaints that are "swept under the rug" and ignored by VA Administrators. In addition, VA Hospital Administrators and Directors would be required to turn over all letters of complaints filed by Veterans and their family members, along with a description of what remedy was given to alleviate the problem, to accreditation committees evaluating that facility for fitness and quality standards. Hospital administrators would be held accountable for fair and just remedy of these complaints. A failure to comply with this process would be considered a performance standard that directly relates to bonus payments and pay raises.

6. That competent, timely and safe medical and psychiatric care is provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs to all Veterans.

7. The registration and competency testing of ALL VA Physicians with the respective State Board of Medical Examiners, In the State that they are actively working in, not just the state they are licensed in. A basic requirement shall be that VA physicians, Nurses and Technicians be able to communicate in English so that they may effectively communicate with patients in both spoken, and written form.

8. That VA Facilities be required to turn over all documents and records in a timely and complete manner in order to assist a Veteran to accomplish the proper adjudication of his/her claim and to facilitate the care of the Veteran by outside providers. This shall include severe criminal penalties and civil liability for the destruction or altering of official medical and administrative files by VA employees and administrators.

9. That the Congress enforce the decisions of the Veterans Court of Appeals and the Board of Veterans Appeals upon VA Regional Offices and the Office of the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

10. That the US Attorney, Civil Rights Division, "cease and desist" the practice of ignoring Veterans Claims of Civil Rights Violations committed by the Department of Veteran Affairs against Veterans and investigate and prosecute all violations. We as Veterans deserve "equal and fair protection under the law" the same as the rest of the citizens of this country. The Justice Department needs to recognize Veterans as a part of that population.

11. We ask that The Congress enact legislation to restore the Rights and Dignity to those who served and to protect those rights from the constant erosion that has taken place. We ask that a system be enacted that guarantees the compassionate and respectful treatment of those who served this country. We ask that the respective Veterans Affairs Committees in the House act on these issues to insure that future enlistees that choose to serve their country have a guarantee that their service will not be forgotten or held in disrespect once they are discharged from active duty. We ask that they can expect competent, timely and safe medical care along with compensation for injuries received while defending this country in both peacetime and combat situations.

It is time to overhaul this broken and grossly unfair system. We ask for fairness, respect and dignity.

It is due to the sacrifices of the Veterans of this country that the rest of the population enjoys the rights and freedoms they have come to know and cherish, it is time for the Veteran to be afforded these same rights as well as the right to “due process” under the Constitution.

"IT IS THE SOLDIER, NOT THE POET, WHO GIVES US FREEDOM OF SPEECH. IT IS THE SOLDIER, NOT THE REPORTER, WHO GIVES US FREEDOM OF THE PRESS. IT IS THE SOLDIER, NOT THE CAMPUS ORGANIZER, WHO GIVES US FREEDOM TO PROTEST. IT IS THE SOLDIER WHO SERVES BENEATH THE FLAG, WHO SALUTES THE FLAG AND WHOSE COFFIN IS DRAPED BY THE FLAG, WHO GIVES THE DEMONSTRATOR THE RIGHT TO BURN THE FLAG."

Sincerely,

The Undersigned

http://www.petitiononline.com/Ferguson/petition.html

 

Petition to Abolish the H-1B Visa Program

The Adequacy of Americans to Do the Job
American scientists deserve to be respected individually, not with stereotypes or prejudice.
Many persons look to a certain international study [Footnotes]as evidence that Americans are all bad at science and mathematics. However, over three quarters of the world did not choose to participate in this study, notably India and China, countries from which are drawn the bulk of the H-1B visa holders. Also, the study is of high-school averages. Americans who go on to study science and technology in college, taking some of the most rigorous coursework one can pursue, deserve to be respected for their knowledge, talent and diligence, not constantly viewed in terms of average American high-school students.

UPDATE:

To: All NACCB Members
From: Mark B. Roberts
          General Counsel
          NACCB

The U.S.Department of Labor recently released interim final regulations
implementing the American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act
which was enacted in October 1998.  The regulations are set to take effect
on January 19, 2001 (one day before the new administration takes office).
NACCB commented on the proposed regulations in early 1999.   The new
regulations impose significant new requirements on employers of non-exempt
H-1B visa holders.  Further, the regulations impose new requirements on
staffing firms placing non-exempt H-1B workers with clients.  We are in the
process of analyzing the lengthy regulations and preparing a memorandum
providing an overview of the new requirements specifically as they pertain
to staffing firms.  Upon completion, we will be distributing the memorandum
to the entire membership.

John McCain - proud co-sponsor of H-1B [Hall of Shame] http://www.apfn.org/apfn/HB-1.htm

Petition to the Congress of the United States to Abolish HB-1 Visa Program http://zazona.com/H1BPetition/L/textLetter.pdf

Petition

http://www.zazona.com/h1bpetition/P/facts.html

IBT Petition:

- January 6, 2001 A.D. -

- DAY 53 -
FRIDAY, JANUARY 5TH, 2001 AD
THE FOLLOWING CLIPS ARE FROM DAY 53 click here FOR FULL REPORT

Dr. Greg J. Dixon led the morning Pastor's meeting. This is a tremendous group of men on this 53rd day. To have a group like this after being here for 53 straight days is a tremendous blessing. It does not upset me that more men are not here at IBT. The thing that makes me sad is the fact of some of the young men that could be here and learn the battle. The older Pastors could send the young men here as a training station for the future. It seems that those that come to the front lines of the battle grow faster and their faith is more deeply rooted. Do any of you have a scripture to share with us?

Pastor Aubrey Vaughan spoke from Psalms 44:1-26. Vs. 1-8 - The Psalmist cried concerning the truth of God's miracles in days gone by. He said, "When I was first saved and began to read the Bible I was perplexed because I did not see the New Testament Church practicing what I was reading. Only occasionally would I see a move of God locally. Then God brought me to the battlefront in Nebraska and I saw. The same thing happened at Fort Worth with Pastor Otwell and the boy's home battle. There, we had all things common. We privately owned property but used each other's equipment by permission because each donated what he had to the common cause."

Pastor Greg A. Dixon led the afternoon meeting. We have reliable information from high up in the Justice Department that the raid will take place anytime before the 20th of January 2001 AD. The Marshals are fearful for the news media to be here. They will order them out of the buildings.

Update: January 7, 2000

BAPTIST TEMPLE ALERT!!!  THE MARSHALS ARE COMING!!!
INDIANAPOLIS BAPTIST TEMPLE--DAY 54!!
U.S.  MARSHALS WILL COME BEFORE THE INAUGURATION!!!

Christian Friends,

A meeting between US Marshals, Dr.  Dixon, Pastor Dixon and the
attorneys
for both sides took place this afternoon.  The tone of this meeting
was different than previous meetings.  The head Marshal, who has exercised
restraint up to this point since he was ordered to seize the property
on November 14, is getting pressure from "higher-ups in Washington".

We have it from unimpeachable sources that the Marshals will raid the
Indianapolis Baptist Temple BEFORE the inauguration on January 20,
2001.  Up to this point, it was believed that the Marshal was waiting
to see what the political efforts of the Baptist Temple would result in,
but that has all changed.

THE CLINTON/RENO JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, WHICH STARTED ITS ADMINISTRATION
BY KILLING 82 MEN WOMEN AND CHILDREN AT WACO, IS ENDING ITS WATCH BY INSISTING ON THE IMMEDIATE SEIZURE OF A
50-YEAR-OLD MAINSTREAM BAPTIST CHURCH, BEFORE THEY CAN GET A PERMANENT LEGISLATIVE SOLUTION!

They are purposely pushing forward the seizure of this church, because
they are afraid that the new administration would stop the seizure.
Clinton has proved himself over and over to be the arch-enemy of the church.

NOW IS THE TIME!!  COME TO INDIANAPOLIS!!

The date of the FEDERAL AGENTS' arrival is down to a 2-week window.
PLEASE COME AND STAND WITH THIS CHURCH.  The Marshals have said that they
will not arrest anyone, and you may walk out if you wish, or else you will be
carried out.  WE ARE FORCING THEM TO BREAK DOWN THE DOOR OF THIS
CHURCH, DESECRATE THIS SANCTUARY AND CARRY OUT THE PASTOR AND THE OTHER CHRISTIANS HERE.   They will have to do it in front of the cameras for all the world to see.

Bring a bedroll and a Bible.  We will feed you.  Come and be part of
this historic stand.  This is the first time in history that the federal
government is moving to seize a church in America.  Stand up with us
for religious liberty today.

CALL I.B.T.  FOR DIRECTIONS OR TO HAVE YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED.  (317) 787-0830 We also need your prayers or financial gifts.  We have spent
$17,000 on this battle since Nov.  14.  Call the church if you can help.

Listen to Pastor W.N.  Otwell live from IBT on short wave Saturday
evening on WWCR 5.070 Mhz, 7:30 to 8:00 pm Eastern time.

I have called for my wife and nine children to join me here at IBT.
They will leave for the 9-hour drive early in the morning (Saturday).

Please pray for us and join us here at IBT if you can.

A servant of Christ, Bruce Evan Murch

PS.  PLEASE FORWARD THIS TO ALL YOUR LISTS!  IT IS CRUCIAL THAT PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT THE IMMINENT ARRIVAL OF THE MARSHALS.

If you represent media and would like an interview, please call me at
(317) 787-0830 OR (540) 730-4427

Indianapolis Baptist Temple Home Page
http://www.indianapolisbaptisttemple.com/

http://indianapolisbaptisttemple.com/redress.html

www.indianapolisbaptisttemple.com
 



Reform the Veterans Administration System!

To: President George W. Bush, Congress and House/Senate VA Committees

"The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war, no matter how justified, shall be
directly proportional as to how they perceive the veterans of earlier wars were treated and appreciated by their
nation." --George Washington

It is time for the archaic VA system to undergo a major overhaul. Veteran’s rights are non-existent. We demand
the right to access the federal court system as well as to have the right to secure representation without limits the
VA now restricts us to. The laws that prohibit the payment and use of legal counsel in our claims process severely
cripples the Veterans Right to “due process under the law”. This law clearly violates the civil rights of Veterans.
We as Veterans want a fair and just system that affords us all the civil and judicial rights and freedoms enjoyed by
the rest of the population. We do not currently have access or the privilege to such a system. We are not only
denied such access, but the US Attorney, Civil Rights Division, fails to investigate Veterans civil complaints
regarding the Department of Veterans Affairs. We are told (unofficially of course) that the US Attorney is the
VA’s Attorney, yet when another citizen has their civil rights violated, the Justice Department gladly steps in. We
are asking for our right to “due process” under the laws and the Constitution we swore to defend.

It is the demand of the following undersigned Veterans, Family members and Friends of Veterans, that the
Congress enacts legislation that restructures the VA claims and Medical care process to allow the following
changes.

1. The timely and fair adjudication of Veterans claims for compensation, without prejudice or malice.

2. Legal representation at all stages of the Veterans claims process. Removal of all restraints that prohibit the hiring
and payment of private legal counsel necessary to prove the Veterans case.

3. Access to the Federal Court System closely mirroring the same guidelines as the Social Security claims process.
This is to include the adoption of time limits and right to counsel policies that are currently in use by the Social
Security Administration.

4. An end to the practice of 'Blanket Denial" of administrative tort claims that are filed as a result of injury at VA
Medical Facilities. The Department of Veterans Affairs shall be held accountable in Civil Court for the actions and
malpractice of its employees and Administrators.

5. The addition of oversight committees that are responsible for the investigation of Veterans Claims of injury and
malpractice at VA Medical Facilities. These committees shall be composed of Veterans, Non VA Physicians and
Non VA Lawyers. This will help curtail the practice of complaints that are "swept under the rug" and ignored by
VA Administrators. In addition, VA Hospital Administrators and Directors would be required to turn over all
letters of complaints filed by Veterans and their family members, along with a description of what remedy was
given to alleviate the problem, to accreditation committees evaluating that facility for fitness and quality standards.
Hospital administrators would be held accountable for fair and just remedy of these complaints. A failure to
comply with this process would be considered a performance standard that directly relates to bonus payments and
pay raises.

6. That competent, timely and safe medical and psychiatric care is provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs
to all Veterans.

7. The registration and competency testing of ALL VA Physicians with the respective State Board of Medical
Examiners, In the State that they are actively working in, not just the state they are licensed in. A basic requirement
shall be that VA physicians, Nurses and Technicians be able to communicate in English so that they may effectively
communicate with patients in both spoken, and written form.

8. That VA Facilities be required to turn over all documents and records in a timely and complete manner in order
to assist a Veteran to accomplish the proper adjudication of his/her claim and to facilitate the care of the Veteran
by outside providers. This shall include severe criminal penalties and civil liability for the destruction or altering of
official medical and administrative files by VA employees and administrators.

9. That the Congress enforce the decisions of the Veterans Court of Appeals and the Board of Veterans Appeals
upon VA Regional Offices and the Office of the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

10. That the US Attorney, Civil Rights Division, "cease and desist" the practice of ignoring Veterans Claims of
Civil Rights Violations committed by the Department of Veteran Affairs against Veterans and investigate and
prosecute all violations. We as Veterans deserve "equal and fair protection under the law" the same as the rest of
the citizens of this country. The Justice Department needs to recognize Veterans as a part of that population.

11. We ask that The Congress enact legislation to restore the Rights and Dignity to those who served and to
protect those rights from the constant erosion that has taken place. We ask that a system be enacted that
guarantees the compassionate and respectful treatment of those who served this country. We ask that the
respective Veterans Affairs Committees in the House act on these issues to insure that future enlistees that choose
to serve their country have a guarantee that their service will not be forgotten or held in disrespect once they are
discharged from active duty. We ask that they can expect competent, timely and safe medical care along with
compensation for injuries received while defending this country in both peacetime and combat situations.

It is time to overhaul this broken and grossly unfair system. We ask for fairness, respect and dignity.

It is due to the sacrifices of the Veterans of this country that the rest of the population enjoys the rights and
freedoms they have come to know and cherish, it is time for the Veteran to be afforded these same rights as well
as the right to “due process” under the Constitution.

"IT IS THE SOLDIER, NOT THE POET, WHO GIVES US FREEDOM OF SPEECH. IT IS THE SOLDIER,
NOT THE REPORTER, WHO GIVES US FREEDOM OF THE PRESS. IT IS THE SOLDIER, NOT THE
CAMPUS ORGANIZER, WHO GIVES US FREEDOM TO PROTEST. IT IS THE SOLDIER WHO
SERVES BENEATH THE FLAG, WHO SALUTES THE FLAG AND WHOSE COFFIN IS DRAPED BY
THE FLAG, WHO GIVES THE DEMONSTRATOR THE RIGHT TO BURN THE FLAG."

Sincerely,

The Undersigned

On-Line Petition http://www.petitiononline.com/Ferguson/petition.html

Second Amendment Petition: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/mmm.htm
Do you believe you have the right to defend yourself and your loved ones?
Do you believe in safety and responsibility?
Do you believe it's time to speak up?

To:  United States Government



To the President, United States Congress, The Fifty State Governors and The Fifty State Legislatures of the United States of America.

RE: Lawful Firearm Ownership

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,

The undersigned petitioners have read and agree with the following statements. Please understand and acknowledge the gravity of these statements.

We, the undersigned petitioners beseech the many members of government to cease carrying through legislation that curtails, diminishes and infringes upon the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Legislation that pertains to which small arms American Citizens can own, how many firearms we can own, any type of national registration scheme, openly and brazenly infringes upon the Second Amendment and is therefore unconstitutional. No form of government in these United States has any business compiling information on which American Citizens own firearms. National gun owner registration is therefore completely and without question against the original intention of the Second Amendment.
Lawful gun ownership among the general population of the United States was intended among other things, to be a final check and balance on the scope of power that government has over its Citizens.
Firearm control legislation that is proposed in order to bring down the incidents of crime is futile and ineffective because of the known fact that violent criminals do not obtain firearms through legal channels of commerce.
We the undersigned petitioners by signing, hereby demonstrate to members of government, our indignation and frustration at being held liable for crimes committed with firearms. We law-abiding firearm owners refuse to be held liable and refuse to be punished for the uncivil, immoral and illegal actions of criminals simply by owning firearms.
We the undersigned petitioners hereby demand that legislation contrived to curtail the use of firearms in crime, concentrate solely on the criminal misuse of firearms.
We the undersigned petitioners hereby charge government with the responsibility of preserving and protecting the original intention and meaning of the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Sincerely,

The Undersigned

http://www.petitiononline.com/STG1/petition.html

 

CITIZEN PETITION

TO THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES

Be it known that we, the undersigned, attest that

  • We oppose any and all further gun control legislation that adds new counterproductive restrictions on law-abiding citizens of the United States, rather than specifically targeting violent criminals.
  • We oppose registration of guns, licensing of people who choose to exercise a Constitutional right, purchase limitations, storage requirements, restrictions on gifts to friends and family members and all other legislation that has the effect of infringing on the Constitution and the Second Amendment rights of decent citizens.
  • We demand that the President and Congress enact only laws which target violent criminals and which have been proven to be effective in reducing violent crime.
  • Furthermore, the President must stop his illegal and unconstitutional attempts to circumvent the legislative powers of Congress by engaging in threats and extortion against a long-established, law-abiding industry.

This petitions will be presented to Congress.

Please visit our website for more information.

Second Amendment Sisters http://www.2asisters.net/ - Join Now! (charter membership campaign)

Pray for the Children: PETITION

To:  US House of Representatives

We, the below signed citizens of the United States, who have signed this petition, hereby request the Government of the United States of America to Allow prayer into our schools.

Sincerely,

The Undersigned

http://www.petitiononline.com/pray/petition.html

Abolition of ALL prior presidential Executive Orders
 

To:  President Bush and Members of Congress

Following is what we believe to be a wonderful way for you, President Bush, and for Congress to begin the new year and our new Administration.
All Executive Orders fraudulently placed upon the shoulders of America must be rescinded, and the restoration of our Constitutional Republic thus assured.

The balance of powers under which this nation was designed to thrive has been thrown in the dust heap for far too long! It must be retrieved,
cleansed of all encumberments, and restored to its rightful position! Let the Executive Branch do that which the Constitution mandates; no more, and no less! Allow all legislation to be accomplished by the Legislative Branch, and force the Judiciary to cease and desist in its law making and law breaking activities! Return to the states all authority belonging to the states, retaining only those specifically delineated powers for the Federal Government, and restoring to the people the rights and responsibilities of citizenship!

Remove from the throat of our nation the heavy hand of the universal land barons into whose clutching grasp your predecessors have given that which was not theirs to give! Give us back our lands, our livelihoods, and our honor! Allow us to be stewards over that which is rightfully ours, and take care to mind your own store before attempting to exert undue authority over that belonging to another!

Sincerely,

The Undersigned

http://www.petitiononline.com/sphinx84/petition.html

 

#########

Subscribe to apfn-1
chooser.gif (706373 bytes)
Powered by groups.yahoo.com

flagbar.jpg (5392 bytes)

American Patriot Friends Network

"....a network of net worker's..

APFN IS NOT A BUSINESS
APFN IS SUPPORTED BY "FREE WILL" GIFT/DONATIONS
Without Justice, there is JUST_US!
http://www.apfn.org

APFN Message Board

APFN Sitemap

APFN Contents Page

APFN Home Page

E-Mail: apfn@apfn.org

Hit Counter

Last updated 04/28/2010