Take Back Your Stolen Vote: "Votescam" Revisited
How the Controllers + media aids & abets in a conspiracy to steal elections
6/6/06 - "The Majority Report" - Tom Hartman Guest Host
Robert Kennedy Jr. Interviewed on Vote Fraud....Wow!
Rolling Stone: Did Bush Steal the 2004 Election?
Last 20 minutes of program.
http://www.apfn.net/pogo06-07-06/A001I060606A.MP3Read about Votescam in Babel Magazine
6/7/06 - The Randi Roads... More... Voter Fraud
What we need to do!!!! http://www.therandirhodesshow.com/
Interview: Brad... Voter Fraud... in San Diego... Re: Brads blog
From: Lisa -
Date: Thurs, Nov 7 2002 4:34 pm
Babel Magazine http://web.archive.org/web/20021112231620/http://www.babelmagazine.com/ -
Check out the New World Order link located on the right hand side of
the Babel homepage.
Take Back Your Stolen Vote: "Votescam" Revisited
by Victor Thorn
During every Federal election, do the networks and major newspapers actually send their own reporters and researchers into polling places, scrambling to discern who the potential winners will be so that they can be the first to "scoop" their competitors with the election results?
NO! The networks don't compete for vote totals. CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN and FOX all belong to VNS - the "Voter News Service," which is a consortium of mass media conglomerates that have pooled their resources and have the exclusive right (bestowed by Congress) to count the votes in every state. None of them compete for these votes! They all come from the same source - VNS - located at 225 W. 34th Street in New York City. In other words, when you watch the "drama" on each of the network broadcasts where they're frantically scrambling to be the first to announce a winner, it's nothing but an illusion. A lie! VNS compiles ALL the data from every election, then posts it simultaneously for each network, plus the major daily newspapers.
In fact, both Time Magazine (March 2, 1992, page 22) and Margaret Sims of the Federal Elections Commission Report (1994) reported that the six primary members of this group (ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, FOX, and AP) received the EXACT same "exit poll" information at the same time from the same company. That's why these networks can declare a winner in a multitude of races only one minute after the polls close. The Associated Press (June 1, 2001, page A04) even reported that the above six media organizations renewed their contract with VNS despite the overwhelming corruption and horror of the 2000 presidential election.
Do you see what's happening here? It's all professional wrestling. Why don't Dan Rather, Tom Brokaw, and Peter Jennings admit to the American public on election night that there is no drama, no scrambling for data, and no heated competition among them for election results? It all comes from the same source. The answer, regrettably, is that this frantic "professional wrestling scenario" is a technique, or excuse, that is needed to steal your vote.
If this is the case, some may say, why haven't we heard about it before? The answer, quite simply, is that everybody in this country SHOULD HAVE heard about it long ago. Mike Wallace of "60 Minutes" is aware of "Votescam," as are Geraldo Rivera, Ross Perot, Janet Reno, Pat Robertson, Ted Turner, Ted Koppel, Larry King, Helen Thomas, Mario Cuomo, Jerry Brown, and the recently deceased Katherine Graham. All of them know our votes are being stolen. Their silence is unforgivable.
Before delving into my overview of "Votescam," I'd like to provide a few example of how pervasive and appalling the electoral process is in this country. Following these case histories, we'll take a very hard look at not only the problems confronting us, but also a way to correct this situation.
EXAMPLE # 1 - In the 1970 Dade County, Florida election, Jim and Ken Collier, authors of "Votescam," found that three minutes after the polls had closed, all of the major networks had already projected the winners in over 250 races! Only one minute after the polls had closed, Channel 7 projected that a certain candidate would not only win, but would receive 96,499 total votes. Well, when the official results were returned, guess how many votes this candidate received. 96,499. Channel 7 was 100% accurate only one minute after the voting had ended!
The Collier brothers went one step further and tracked down all the projections versus the actual results for all the major Florida races in 1970. Here is what they found:
Senate 43 45,696
House 98 97,031
House 104 67,940
House 107 81,802
The question that we have to ask is: How can the networks not only be so accurate, but arrive at these startling projections one-to-three minutes after the polls close? Think about it. After the voting stations close at 9:00, what needs to be done? Well, tens of thousands of punch card ballots need to be collected; then they must be fed into a punch card reader. Now, I know what this process entails because I operated an entire room full of IBM Mainframe computers during the mid-1980's (back when punch cards were still in use). To read even a few drawers of cards was quite an experience, considering all the misfeeds, jams, etc. Anyway, after all the cards are read, the data needs to be compiled, organized, printed out, then transmitted to the television station where it'll be prepped for broadcast. Do you think all of these steps can be completed in one-to-three minutes?
The Collier Brothers found it very implausible, so they went to Channel 7 and tried to track down the "super computer" that made these projections only one-to-three minutes after the polls closed, all with a 99-100% accuracy. The first thing they wanted to know was which reporter called in the raw totals to the television studio. Well, they were told that it wasn't a reporter, after all, but a member of the League of Women Voters.
Since only a handful of reporters could be out in the field (considering that this was only an affiliate station), it would seem logical that only a few precincts could be sampled. But how, they wondered, could 99% of the precincts be reporting by 11:00 - only two hours after the polls closed? The League of Women Voters must be incredibly efficient.
So, the Colliers visited Joyce Deiffenderfer, head of the local League of Women Voters, and asked for a list of all the people who had counted votes on election night (being that Channel 7 said that's where they got their results). Realizing that the cat was out of the bag, Ms. Deiffenderfer, in tears, admitted that there weren't ANY LWV members in ANY of the precincts that night. They hadn't counted a single vote, and she didn't "want to get caught up in this thing."
Hmmm. Within three minutes of the poll's closing, the TV station had projections that were 99-100% accurate, and within two hours, 99% of all the precincts had supposedly reported their results. But it's funny because no one was able to locate the super computer that made these fabulous projections. Nor could anyone be found that even counted or reported the vote counts! I wonder where all the numbers came from?
EXAMPLE # 2 - In a 1973 Florida election, Printomatic Voting Machines had been installed to make the entire process run smoother. Well, here's what happened in one election. All of the Printomatic devices have a locked area in back that every election supervisor is supposed to check before the election to insure that all the wheels were set at ZERO. But guess what. All of the keys had been taken away from the supervisors, so none of the totals could be verified. Well, shortly after the polls opened, the paper rolls began to jam in all the machines, making them inoperable. Being that no one could vote, the backs of each device were eventually opened, and guess what was found. When the paper rollers were pulled out, they ALL had the final vote totals already printed on them at seven o'clock in the morning! Needless to say, every election volunteer walked off the job.
EXAMPLE # 3 - If you think voter fraud only happened during Al Capone's Chicago days (do you recall their helpful hint - "vote early, and vote often"), then you're seriously mistaken. Here are a few other "tricks of the trade"
- Shave the wheels in the back of a voting machine so they skip ahead.
- Before the polls open, unlock the back of a voting device and set the total counters ahead for a certain candidate.
- If a CLEAR ballot box isn't used, stuff it with pre-punched vote cards before the polls open.
- If a computerized machine is used, unplug it or turn it off so all the previous totals are erased.
- Finally, the League of Women Voters have been captured on videotape in Florida with pencils and tweezers punching out cards for certain candidates, then shoving them into ballot boxes.
- The list could go on forever.
EXAMPLE # 4 - Finally, during the 1996 Republican Party Primary, Pat Robertson was kicking everyone's ass in the early stages of the race, especially Bob Dole and Steve Forbes. Then when he rolled into Arizona with high hopes of another victory that would catapult him toward getting his party's nomination, something strange happened. The computers broke down!
Yes, VNS had actually declared Buchanan the winner. Karen Johnson, Buchanan's Arizona State Coordinator, got a call from Governor Fife Symington congratulating her on what he called a "decisive" victory. Senator John McCain also drafted a congratulatory letter, while all three networks and CNN said that Dole would definitely finish third, while Forbes took second and Buchanan won.
Then the computers mysteriously went down. When they came back up, guess what happened. Pat Buchanan ended up a distant THIRD, while Bob Dole won! When asked about this phenomenon, Buchanan joked about the computers (referring to the "fix" being in), "They seemed to work better after they brought 'em back!"
VOTER NEWS SERVICE (VNS)
As mentioned, VNS is the only American company that counts votes in every Federal election. Ponder this point for a moment. A faceless corporation that 99% of the people in this country have never heard of is responsible for tabulating our votes. This Service was created by the Big Six in 1964 (one year after JFK was assassinated - a point I will discuss later in this essay), and is currently run by ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, FOX, and AP. Over the years, VNS has gone through a variety of name changes, and was originally called NES (News Election Services).
When you consider the ramifications of every Presidential, Congressional, and Gubernatorial race, you'll see that VNS is one of the most influential corporations in America! Yet, no one has ever heard of them. How can such a fantastic responsibility be placed into the hands of a company that was developed by a consortium of corporate media conglomerates? The most glaring observation one could make from this situation is as such: if a faceless, unknown agency (VNS) is the sole vote counter rather than accountable local volunteers in each precinct, is it conceivable that a wealthy politician or political party could clandestinely pay them off to rig an election? Now remember - 99% of the American people don't even know about the existence of VNS. The answer is obvious.
Robert H. Lande, Professor of Law at the University of Baltimore in a letter (dated October 22, 2000) to the United States Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission on behalf of the American Antitrust Institute, said, "The Government should file suit to break up the VNS." He continued (shortly after the 2000 fall election), "Why the uniformity of wrong results? This can be explained by a lack of competition. All of the "competing" major networks are actually colluding with one another, and they call their collusion the VNS." Finally, Mr. Lande concludes, "If the six largest manufacturers of automobiles, canned food, or aluminum decided to close existing operations and pool resources to save money, the antitrust enforcement agencies would be after them immediately."
NETWORK NEWS REPORTING
"When you're dealing with the networks, you're dealing with a shadow government."
Supreme Court Correspondent
NOTE: On Monday, November 2, 1988, the night before the off-year elections, ABC News posted hundreds of election results - one whole day before a single person ever placed a vote!!!!!!
Now that we know the networks, CNN, FOX, and AP all get their election results from the same source - VNS - we need to ask ourselves, why is there such an emphasis on SPEED! Speed is the key, at least where the networks are concerned. Why? Because the illusion of reporting "speedy" results is the second piece of the puzzle needed to steal an election (I'll give you the first piece a little later). But y'see, here's how things work ... here's a typical scenario.
Dan Rather appears on your TV screen at one minute after the hour ... one minute after the polls have closed in a certain part of the country. Naturally, he'll already have some "projections," and he'll even announce some winners - one minute after the polls close.
So, they'll rack up all their totals, show who's ahead, then focus their attention on the last intangible ... those races that are "too close to call." Once you hear those words, ya know you're in trouble. That's when there's a huge gap in reporting - the lag time - when Dan Rather talks to all his "boys" to get their expert opinion. Of course, not once is he mentioning that all their results are coming from VNS. That information isn't important enough for the American people to know.
Then, all of a sudden, one of two things happens. First, there's either some technical difficulties, or else the computers break down. If you don't believe me, hearken back to the Florida debacle in 2000. After awhile, then, the network head will report either a huge landslide of results with one candidate pulling way ahead, or else the "difficulty" was corrected and there was a drastic turnaround in votes, with the candidate in front falling far behind, or vice versa.
But speed is the key ingredient. While the polling place is closing down one minute after the hour and punch cards or computer data is being transferred to county headquarters, then onward to VNS, none of it can be verified or made official in the haste. A perfect example would be the 2000 Iowa caucus. With over 2,000 polling places, the AP announced a winner one-minute after the caucus had OPENED (not closed) and not one vote had been cast. Think about how absurd these examples are. ABC News is reporting election results a day BEFORE an election, and the AP is announcing winners before any votes are not only analyzed, but even cast!
The first ingredient needed to assure the "desired results" from a particular election is the use of polls and exit polls. Before I continue, I'd like to make one thing perfectly clear:
THE POLL RESULTS THAT YOU SEE ON THE NIGHTLY NEWS AND IN YOUR LOCAL PAPER ON A DAILY BASIS ARE NOTHING BUT A CONDITIONING TOOL USED TO MAKE THE GENERAL PUBLIC THINK THE RIGHT WAY.
In other words, the supposed polls that you see every night on the World News do nothing but mold opinion; not mirror it. The concept is similar to an old psychological test where 20 "plants" are told to say that a certain flashcard is colored red, when in reality it is purple. When the 21st person is finally asked what color the card is, they've been so conditioned to think it's purple (because everyone else said so), that they go against their own natural inclinations and answer incorrectly. Actually, a more appropriate psychological term for this process is called "psychic driving." To acclimate the voting public on how they're supposed to react, a specific message is repeatedly hammered into their heads on a daily basis.
So, are you starting to see how this little game is played? First of all we're set-up with "public opinion" polls, which are nothing but an outright farce, and do not in any way indicate how we truly feel. All the numbers are cooked! But this con job plays a very important role in that it gets us "ready" for who the Controllers have decided will win in a particular election.
After the stage has been set by repeatedly saying that candidate X is ahead in the polls by 10 points (even though they may only have a 20% favorable rating by the voting public), we are now ready for stage two - the lightning fast projections and "exit poll" results. Exit polls, I hope you know by now, are even shadier than the pre-election surveys. Why? Because it's one last chance to condition the public and prepare them for who the "winner" will be. (As a side note, exit polls also play a large part in lessening the impact that voters in western states play in determining who will ultimately emerge as the victor.)
As we have already discovered, none of the networks "scramble" to get election results. All of their information comes from the exact source at the exact same time - VNS. They have already admitted this fact, although they do so as quietly as possible. Then, within one minute of the polls closing, the networks project a winner based on exit polls that are startling in their accuracy (with only 1 % of the vote actually in).
The next logical question to ask at this point is - if the networks aren't running around frantically doing election-day exit polling, then who is? The answer - an outfit called VRS - Voter Research Surveys. Now, try to guess who operates VRS. You're right - the same Big Six media conglomerates that run VNS!
Before we go any further, the networks would say, "Wait a minute. There is an organization that overlooks VNS called the NCCP - National Council of Public Polls. These folks guarantee that everything is on the up and up."
I must admit, there is indeed an organization called the NCCP that is made-up of a consortium of pollsters and news outlets. But guess what. The same media members that founded VNS also belong to the NCCP. Pretty convenient, huh! So, between the networks, VNS, VRS, and NCC, we have polls, exit polls, then finally those remarkable projections that are almost always right on the mark. But how can their estimates always be so close to what the final "tabulated" results are? That's easy. All the election supervisors have to do is doctor the computer numbers to match the exit polls; then they come up with what was already a pre-determined result in the first place. How do you think we keep getting all these asinine politicians in office (the same ones that stay there forever), especially when everyone hates them? We sure as hell aren't voting for them (at least if there's another choice). The picture is becoming a little clearer, isn't it?
In an election totally free of fraud, citizens would hand-write their votes on paper ballots, place them in a CLEAR box, then watch as an impartial group of volunteers counted their votes in full view. The results would then be posted at the polling place before being shipped to the county courthouse. With computerized voting, we simply send a "blip" through cyberspace. There is no paper trail (a physical ballot), nor are there any checks and balances. We're simply told to TRUST those in charge of the election and everything will be okay. Considering the evidence I've provided thus far, how much faith does that inspire in you?
Now, what if we found that it's possible to manipulate these computerized, UNSEEN results to "correspond" to the projections (also doctored) that were given one minute after the polls closed so that everything would be official. What if someone told you - "hey, it'd be very easy to find a computer programmer that could write some software that would already determine the winner regardless of the vote totals." The procedure wouldn't be much more difficult to pull off than placing a paper roller into the back of a Printomatic voting machine that already had the totals pre-printed on them.
Now I'm sure someone will say - that's preposterous!
To prove the process isn't corrupt, all that the software designers have to do is show you the "source code" from their program. I mean, how complicated could it be to write a program that simply counts votes? Any tenth grade kid that has taken an introductory course in computer science could write it.
But guess what. There have been numerous researchers that have tried to inspect the computer software at VNS. But instead of gladly allowing them to do so (these are fair and open elections, aren't they), VNS flatly denied their requests, saying that their programs were "trade secrets." In other words, their software is afforded the same protection as any other corporate trade secret. To me, though, the same rationale doesn't apply for two reasons. First, a privately-owned for-profit company is much different than one that is very influential in determining who will assume the Presidency and many Congressional seats. My second argument is just as straight-forward. What do these software designers have to hide? I mean, they haven't created programs that prevent America from being bombed by incoming ballistic missiles like those used at NORAD. The only thing (supposedly) their software does is count votes. Why all the secrecy? Why don't they want anyone inspecting their source codes?
I could ramble on and on about this subject, but instead, I'll provide a slew of quotes from those in the know that will cast some light on how detrimental computerized voting is to the American electoral process. Here goes:
On the night before the 1988 Presidential election, the following conversation took place on the CBS Evening News.
Dan Rather: Realistically, could the fix be put on in a national election?
Howard J. Strauss (computer expert - Princeton University): Get me a job with a company that writes the software for this program. Then I'd have access to one-third of the votes. Is that enough to fix a general election?
Mr. Strauss has also said, "When it comes to computerized elections, there are no safeguards. It's not a door without locks, it's a house without doors."
Judge Richard Niehouse, in a 1985 ruling against the Cincinnati Board of Elections, "There is no adequate and proper safeguard against the computers being programmed to distort the election results."
Eva Waskell, an election researcher for over ten years, weighed in with this observation. "One major problem is that computer codes that run the machines are protected as trade secrets, which makes it very hard to have an election independently audited." She also added, "The election industry is virtually unregulated. There are no mandatory regulations or standards for accurately recording and counting votes."
Craig C. Donsanto, a Deputy Attorney in the Justice Department, warned us in a July 4, 1989 edition of the Los Angeles Times. "You have to have access and some degree of technical knowledge to penetrate an electronic tabulating system. Most of them have been or will be ... simply because voting is the way we determine who gets power in this country."
The following is a quote from the same L. A. Times article on voter fraud (7-4-89). "Some critics of computerized vote counting worry about the potential for 'trapdoors,' 'time bombs' and 'Trojan Horses.' A computer operator with the correct password could place a trapdoor, or a series of hidden vote counting instructions inside the system," according to Election Watch Report. "Once into the system, the operator could program the computer to count votes for one candidate as votes for another. After the votes have been changed to swing the election, the trapdoor could be closed."
In a letter from Attorney Ellis Rubin (3-24-92) to Attorney General William Barr, he described how to rig computerized voting. "Anyone with access codes could punch into elections and change the results ... and nobody would be the wiser. That also goes for the software involved."
As you can readily see, many people from different walks of life are worried about the very real dangers associated with computerized voting. It's clear that we've opened a Pandora's Box. The only question now - is it too late to close the lid, or have all the evils already escaped?
JFK AND WATERGATE
Since we've come this far, many people might be wondering, "How could we have allowed what was once the world's greatest democratic process to be tainted by the likes of VNS, computers, and the corporate media?" Well, according to famed researcher Mae Brussel, who the Collier Brothers quote in "Votescam," the roots of this atrocity can be traced directly to the assassination of John F. Kennedy.
Basically, here is what they purport. After Kennedy was killed in 1963 and the Warren Report came out shortly thereafter, everybody (the media included) knew that its claims were so preposterous that they bordered on the ridiculous. Any mainstream journalist worth their weight in salt could have blown the lid off that story in five minutes, so those in control knew they needed to scramble fast to keep the genie in the bottle. So, the CIA, who was instrumental in orchestrating JFK's demise, made a deal with the press. If they kept the lid on this ruse, they would get control of the vote count in every upcoming election.
"Votescam" is nothing more than a tradeoff between the media and the power brokers. The Warren Report was a complete load of bull. Lee Harvey Oswald never fired a fucking shot! So, as reported by the Air Force Staff College and American University, the FBI, CIA, and various media heads met in 1964 and came to an agreement. If the media bigwigs didn't expose the obvious lies about JFK's assassination, they could become the nation's official vote counters and source for election results.
In 1963, JFK was killed. In 1964, NES (News Election Services) was founded by the networks, AP, and UPI.
Now, if anyone doesn't believe that the Controllers placed a tremendous amount of heat on the media to cover the Warren Report lies, then check out CIA Document # 1035-960:
"We do not recommend discussion of the assassination question where it is already not taking place. Where discussion is active, however, addresses are requested:
To discuss the publicity problem with liason and friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors), pointing out that the Warren Commission made as thorough an investigation as humanly possible, and that further speculative discussion only plays into the hands of the opposition. Point out that parts of the conspiracy talk appear to be deliberately generated by Communist propagandists. Urge them to use their influence to discourage unfounded and irresponsible speculation.
To employ propaganda assets to answer and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose."
It's fairly evident why the Controllers would want to conceal the truth about the Warren Report, but why were the spooks so enraged by JFK in the first place? The answer can be found in a statement that Kennedy uttered shortly before his death. It appears that he was so disgusted by the Secret Service and its nefarious practices that he vowed to "shatter it into a million pieces and scatter it to the wind!"
When threatened, the CIA reacts. JFK went for their throat, so he ended up with a bullet in his head a couple months later. The assassination was messy, and a number of mistakes were made. To compensate for their obvious errors, ex-CIA founder and director Allen Dulles met secretly with Chief Justice Earl Warren and told him that if their committee didn't bullshit the American public, world peace would be in grave danger.
So, what happened? Well, in November 1963, control of this country was ultimately handed over to the shadow powers - to the likes of the CIA, CFR, and the secret societies that lurk behind the curtain. Earl Warren put out a "fluff" report packed with lies that is still maintained by CIA disinformation to this day. Earl Warren buckled to Allen Dulles, thus tainting his image for all-time, and subsequently selling a large part of his soul for eternity.
Before closing this section, I'd like to touch upon one last point that the Collier Brothers bring out in "Votescam." It seems that vote fraud not only took on greater importance with the Kennedy assassination, but also extended all the way to Watergate. Here's their scoop: Katherine Graham, a media powerhouse and ruling queen tyrant of the Washington Post, also owned a television station in Florida that was well aware of the "Votescam" allegations made by Jim and Ken Collier. Well, after the brothers shouted their news to whoever would listen, Richard Nixon and his cronies found out about their evidence.
Now, being that Nixon was never a fan of the media, especially the Washington Post, he layed the hammer down on Katherine Graham by threatening to revoke her FCC license at the TV station because she ignored such an abundance of "Votescam" evidence. Backed into a corner, Ms. Graham stumbled onto an insignificant break-in at the Watergate Hotel and turned it into a huge scandal that eventually destroyed Tricky Dick. The story is much more complex, but what essentially happened was that the media, when threatened and forced to cover their tracks, asserted its power by railroading a sitting president out of office.
The octopus-like arms of "Votescam" keep extending outward!!!!
I'd like to begin this final section with a simple question (and I'm going to type it in bold, capital letters for maximum effect):
DO YOU TRUST THE CORPORATE MEDIA IN THIS COUNTRY TO BE COMPLETELY HONEST AND FORTHRIGHT WITH YOU?
If you answered yes to this question, then you don't need to read any further because you obviously don't think we have a problem with the type of information that the citizens of this country are receiving.
But if you answered in the negative, then all I can say is this - if the media isn't being 100% honest with you in regard to the information it disseminates, then how can we trust them with something as important as counting the votes in all of our major elections? Think for a moment who we've given this responsibility to - and they're not even MAN enough to level with us and come clean. Instead, they play their little drama games and pull the same crooked shit that they always pull. They're darn rotten to the core, and we shouldn't put up with it any longer! Believe me, the people who run the show aren't stupid. In fact, they're brilliant in their ingenious deceitfulness. And until we call them on it, those bastards are gong to keep snowing us like they've always done.
So, before I continue, I'd like to throw a few more bits of information your way. In the 1988 presidential election, CBS was the first to call George Bush the winner at 9:17 p.m. - only 17 minutes after the polls closed, with voting stations still open in the western states. What I'd like to know is - WHY THE RUSH? We elect the president in early November, and he's not inaugurated until mid-January - over two months later. Why do we need to prematurely announce a winner after only 17 fucking minutes!??? It takes county officials at least a month to verify all the vote totals. Are we SO greedy for results that we're willing to sacrifice the very SANCTITY of our democratic process for the "ruse" of speed that the networks are leading us to believe?
Look at what we've done. The United States Government doesn't tabulate a single vote (thank God) in any of the gubernatorial, congressional, or presidential elections. But since this snake is out of the picture, we hand over the responsibility to a demon-beast that's equally as hideous. Plus, to add insult to injury, 60% of all the votes in this country are now classified as "computerized votes." That means we can't see them or physically count them ... we have to simply TRUST that VNS does everything properly in their "invisible" little clandestine world.
With the above premise in mind, I'm going to let you in on the most crucial secrets of our current age. Here it is: DO YOU KNOW WHAT SCARES THE HELL OUT THE CONTROLLERS MORE THAN ANYTHING?
ANSWER: That a "renegade" candidate will emerge on the scene who rallies and inspires the people to such an extent that he or she steamrolls into the Presidency and EXPOSES the Big Lie! The Controllers spend practically every waking moment trying to prevent this scenario. Y'see, if this maverick candidate gets into office, the whole house of cards will tumble. It'll be EXACTLY like the Wizard of Oz. Do you remember how feeble, horrified, and in awe Dorothy and her cohorts were when they first entered Oz? The entirety of this huge, cumbersome, all-encompassing kingdom literally reduced them to trembling little saps. But then the veil was removed and they saw first-hand what a SHAM was being pulled on them. After that, the Wizard would NEVER be able to rule over them with such terrifying brilliance as he had before.
In terms of American society, the Controllers will do ANYTHING in their power to keep from being exposed as the rotten, lying, conniving bastards that they really are. And I'll tell ya; it wouldn't take much to bring these fuckers down. Think about it - a candidate that is truly "of, for, and by the People" would go on TV and say, "Guess what. These son-of-a-bitches have been screwing you for years, and here's how." Then this renegade would go down the line and say, "This is a lie, this is a lie, this is a lie, this is a lie ... and here is how we're going to change things." From that point forward, heads will start rolling, and the Controllers, who have been plotting and deceiving us for at least a century (or more) will stand like horrified little deer in the headlights of a fucking locomotive as their con job is brought out into the open. All their "hard work" will have been for naught as we hang 'em from their feet in a public square like the Italians did to Mussolini. We'll put all those idiots out of
business and finally get things turned around in this country. We'll storm the corridors of power in D.C., trample through the financial centers in New York City, and take back our paychecks and freedom from the pricks who now put the screws to us.
The above scenario is the key to what's happening in the world right now. The Controllers obsess over every aspect of keeping the lid on their scam - from newscasts to mind control to elections. The thought of a renegade candidate who CARES about the people and tells them the truth makes them wake up in the middle of the night in cold sweats, shivering with fear. All it would take is ONE stinking revelation of truth and the whole game is over. Do you get it!!!! If given the opportunity, one person CAN change the world. If this candidate did speak to us, the Controller's vision of a One World hellish government would go down the drain in a heartbeat.
To combat this scenario from ever coming to fruition, the Controllers need to do one thing - NEVER allow one of those renegade candidates to get into office. So what do they do? They know how sick everyone is of their corrupt, "two-party" system. (Actually, it's nothing more than one snake with two-heads) So, they rig the election process. Here is how the system currently operates. If punch card ballots are used, after everyone votes and the polls close, the "results" are either taken to county headquarters, or shipped directly to VNS ... without verification. If computerized voting is the foray, the machines are linked directly to the VNS super-computers via phone lines so that they can "interact." Then, minutes after the polls close, the networks project a winner based on supposed exit polls. Within a day or so everything's swept under the rug, and then they have a month or two to make (fix) the actual results jive with the "projections."
Now, get this. The Florida "hanging chad" debacle in the 2000 presidential election was vitally important for one very calculated reason. It made the voters so sick of punch card ballots that sometime soon, a politician in Washington D.C. will come out and "save" us by sponsoring a bill that will put computers in EVERY polling place across America. By touting how easy, fast, and reliable these computers are; they'll get the propaganda machine rolling and convince us that this idea will be our salvation.
But when you look past their veil of bullshit, here's what will happen to put the "fix" in. As things stand now (especially with punch cards or hand ballots), it still takes an enormous amount of people to be corrupted - election supervisors, volunteers, etc. But if we switch to 100% computerized voting, think how easy it'll be to "throw" an election. Ya'd only need to bribe or payoff one or two programmers in the whole country instead of countless county and party officials. With one centralized computer existing in an invisible realm with programs that can't be checked due to "trade secrets," we'll never actually have a chance to see our ballots first-hand. We'll simply push a button, send our vote through cyberspace, then place our TRUST in VNS, sleazy programmers, and the corporate media.
So, here are the solutions:
***** Instantly abolish VNS and exit polling.
***** If the networks insist on perpetrating the status quo, in light of the potential (and outright evidence of) voter fraud, bring charges of criminal negligence, fraud, and abuse of trust against them, plus revoke their broadcast license.
If this course of action doesn't work, convict them on the RICO Act for racketeering and conspiracy. The American people cold bring a class-action lawsuit against them (similar to the tobacco company cases) for unduly influencing the outcome of an election.
I'll reiterate, if we don't inherently trust the information being fed to us by the networks and corporate media due to their constant lies and manipulation, how can we place our faith in them to be honest with something as important as the election process?
***** Require positive picture I.D. when voting.
***** Allow ONLY American citizens to vote.
***** Change the voting day to Saturday.
***** Institute Vote Trakker.
Vote Trakker is a computerized touch screen voting system that is accessed by a personalized voter I.D. card that allows every person to CONFIRM their vote. Here is how it works. Vote Trakker is a stand-alone machine that is not connected to any external communications networks - thus it can't be hacked. Being that there are not modems or phone lines, outside forces can't clandestinely intrude and monkey with the results.
Then, once a person votes, they will receive a numbered, printed receipt. At the polling place, each voter can then check their numbered receipt against a print-out that is posted at each voting station. By doing this, they'll be able to insure that their votes weren't switched somewhere along the line. Also, the Vote Trakker will make it much easier to vote for a write-in candidate (as opposed to the current system where it is extremely difficult). To make it more conducive to vote for write-in candidates, we can more readily lessen the stranglehold of the two-party system. Finally, ALL results will be tabulated, verified, and confirmed at EACH POLLING PLACE before they are sent to the county courthouse (or onto a VNS-type institution).
That's it! No rigging, no hanging chads, no telephone lines or unverifiable, hidden computer programs. This is all we need to do to put the election of public officials back into the people's hands. The big question now is - do we want to take these rather simple steps, or do we want to allow the networks and VNS to keep operating as usual? If we do nothing, I GUARANTEE that the long-awaited candidate that tells us the truth will never be given an opportunity to speak. Instead, we'll be stuck with the same crooked asshole politicians that have already sickened us to no end.
Here's the bottom line: The corporate media has to toe a fine line between perpetuating the Controller's lies and trying to maintain their credibility. If we quit believing them, guess what. The Show is over! They've lost their ability to influence us any longer. Well, I hate to break the news, but the media has already lost their credibility. Look at the JFK assassination. Almost 40 years later, they're still perpetrating the same bullshit story that Lee Harvey Oswald was a lone-nut assassin. Now they've stolen our vote, too!
But we can finally see through their lies. The Wizard of Oz has been exposed and emasculated. Now that we see the truth - the ruse - are we going to keep letting them snow us, or will we take steps to elect that candidate who'll level with us and get rid of all those rotten bastards? Time is running out. The New World Order isn't something that's going to happen in the "future." It's already here! It's now or never. Taking back our vote is the first step toward taking back our country.
Was the 2004 Election Stolen?
BY ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.