Should The Senate Be Sued?

From: spiker spiker@amnix.com

Sue The United States Senate??? YES!!
Contact: John B. Thompson, Attorney
1172 South Dixie Highway, Suite 111
Coral Gables, Florida 33146-2750
Phone & Fax: 305-666-4366
E-Mail: Jackpeace@aol.com (John B. Thompson)

Miami Attorney Jack Thompson announces today his intent to represent more than a thousand American citizens, including former Clinton loyalist and now leading Clinton critic, Larry Nichols, in a federal lawsuit setting aside the United States Senate's verdict in the impeachment trial of the President.

Jack Thompson ran for office against Janet Reno in Florida.
He collected information and provided this information
to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Biden,
Chairman at the time.

Janet Reno Uses Call Girls
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/janet.htm

From: "Dr. Ken Larsen" kencan@xmission.com
Subject: Re: Sue The United States Senate??? YES!! Sue The United States Senate??? YES!!

I'm not sure the Constitution authorizes any judicial authority, including the Supreme Court, to review an impeachment decision by the Senate. Clinton has committed some crimes for which he can and should be ultimately charged, tried and sentenced. The Senate has decided the offences are not serious enough to justify removal from office. It was a political decision. I think it was final. If the Founders intended it to be reviewable by the judiciary, why not just have the trial before the judiciary? I'm not sure proceeding with this suit will not injure the Constitution even more. The authority of the judicial branch is detailed in Article III, Section 2. There is no authority granted to review impeachment decisions. Further, Article II, section 6, paragraph 1 states, "and for any speech or debate in either house, they shall not be questioned in any other place." That phrase could immunize them from further action in the matter.

The question before an impeachment trial is not whether the President committed any specific acts for which the House has impeached, but rather whether the President should be removed from office. The first question can be answered in a future criminal trial.

I think our legal recourse now is either to seceede from the union, claiming the Constitution has been nullified, or continue to pretend we have a constitution and endure 2 more years of Hell.

Dr. Ken Larsen

APFN RESEARCH AND SENATE VOTE:
TITLE: "THIS CASE IS NOT TO BE CITED OR PUBLISHED"
EXPOSE' LAWYERS' SECRET OATH
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/cfr.htm


Contact Congress:
http://apfn.org/apfn.htm

[APFN] 02/12/99 - Birthday - Abraham Lincoln -

"...The people are the masters of both Congress and
courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to
overthrow the men who pervert it!...."

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having
knowledge of [they are giving allegiance to this] the
commission of any treason against them, conceals and does
not, as soon as may be disclosed and make known the same to
the President or to some judge of the United States, or the
governor or to some judge or justice or a particular State, is
guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined not more
$1,000 or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
(June 25 1948, ch 645, 62 Stat. 807) TREASON
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/apfncont.htm
Record 19
Name: Alex Martinex
From: Miami, FL
Time: 1999-02-04 22:57
Comments: Congrats! Great Information. I just wanted to share with
you my views on the present situation of this country. I believe
that if Congress DOES NOT get rid of Mr. Clinton, RIGHT NOW, WHILE THEY HAVE HIM ON THE ROPES, our country is in for a lot of trouble.
If they, Congress, DO NOT remove Clinton from office NOW, he will
become our last elected president. He is planning a third term by
changing the 22 Amendment (APFN- SEE HJ 17 IH)-
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.J.RES.17.IH
and he also has the Executive Orders that he needs to put this
country under Martial Law, either due to a real emergency or a
fake one, it makes no difference to him. We know what that
would mean to us all; the loss of every liberty and right that
we have ever had. I hope that I'm wrong, but I truly believe that
"Willy" has his plans all mapped out.

[APFN] - My prayer -----
God loves!
I love like God!
May God's love be with you!

Re: Research by James Montgomery 08/05/1996
Knowledge if Freedom BBS 1-910-869-0780 - 24/hrs - 28,000 Baud

"The United States Is Still A British Colony" A Documentary
review of Charters and Treaties.

"Esquire - In English Law. A title of dignity next above
gentleman, and below knight. Also a title of office given to
sheriffs, sergeants, and Barristers at law, justice of the
peace, and other." Blacks Law Dictionary fourth ed. p 641

On December 2, 1817 John Quincy Adams, then Secretary of State,
wrote to Buck (an attorney) regarding the position Buck had
been assigned. The letter reads:

... if it should be the option of the Government that the
acceptance on your part of the commission under which it was
granted did not interfere with your citizenship.
لل It is the opinion of the Executive that under the 13th
amendment to the constitution by the acceptance of such an
appointment from any foreign Government, a citizen of the
United States ceases to enjoy that character, and becomes
incapable of hold any office of trust or profit under the
United States or either of them..." J.Q.A.

By virtue of these titles and honors, and special
privileges, lawyers have assumed political and economic
advantages over the majority of citizens. A majority may
vote, but only a minority (lawyers) may run for political
office.

It is said that of the 545 from the three branches of
U.S. Government, that only 34 are not members of the
American Bar Association, A Union!

One last thought to ponder:

I shall exert every faculty I process in aiding to
prevent the Constitution from be nullified, destroyed,
or impaired; and even though I shall see it fail, I will
still, with a VOICE feeble, perhaps, but earnest as ever
issued from human lips, and with extinguish, call on the
PEOPLE to come to its rescue.
--- Daniel Webster

"We must obey GOD rather than men"
--- Acts 5:29

APFN NEW ----COMPILED RESEARCH:
TITLE: "THIS CASE IS NOT TO BE CITED OR PUBLISHED"
AN EXPOSE' OF THE LAWYERS' SECRET OATH

Excrete:
All the courts of this once great land have been changed
starting with the Supreme Court decision of 1938 in
Erie R.R. v. Thompkins...(re: Ben Freeman tapes of 1989)

The UCC is the law merchant's: code for the administration
of the bankruptcy. The UCC is now the new law of the land as
far as the courts are concerned. Washington D.C. adopted the
Uniform Commercial Code in 1963, just six weeks or so after
Kennedy was killed.

The American Bar Association is a franchise on the Lawyer's
Guild of Great Britain....

Final note: Every wonder why "WE" have never been able to
get "OUR" case in a court.... all the information in the
above package....
http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/overview.html
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE - ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/overview.html

APFN IS NOT A BUSINESS 
APFN IS SUPPORTED BY "FREE WILL" GIFT/DONATIONS
Without Justice, there is JUST_US!
http://www.apfn.org 

Subscribe to apfn-1
chooser.gif (706373 bytes)
Powered by groups.yahoo.com

American Patriot Friends Network

"...a network of net workers..."

Without Justice, there is JUST_US!

APFN IS NOT A BUSINESS 
APFN IS SUPPORTED BY "FREE WILL" GIFT/DONATIONS
Without Justice, there is JUST_US!
http://www.apfn.org

 

bar3_anm.gif (4491 bytes)

 APFN Sitemap

APFN Message Board

APFN Sitemap

APFN Contents Page

APFN Home Page

E-Mail: APFN@apfn.org

Hit Counter

Last updated on 08/07/2010 06:15 PM