WHY?

 

Subject: WHY?
    Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 21:27:41 -0500
    From: "wcking" wcking@tnaccess.com
Reply-To: "wcking" wcking@tnaccess.com
      To: apfn@apfn.org

 May 6, 2000

I'd like to ask ten little questions of you and my fellow Americans.

Why is the United States of America being destroyed from within by the very
officials we expect to protect her from destruction?

Why is our Constitution, the Law of our Land, being defiled by elected
officials who swore to uphold this same Constitution?

Why are no elected officials standing to defend the Constitution they swore
to protect from foreign enemies and domestic traitors?

Why are the Laws of our land flagrantly disobeyed by elected officials?

Why is our Bill of Rights trashed by elected officials at all levels of Gov.?

Why is the 2nd Amendment declaring our God given right to own and bear arms
being denied, suborned and infringed by elected officials sworn to protect and
defend all citizens rights?

Why are American citizens allowing elected officials to criminally harm
American citizens without demanding that this lawlessness be stopped?

Why is a supposedly free people allowing criminals disguised as Congressmen to
murder, rob, rule and disarm them?

Why are no decent, fearless, strong, assertive men and women standing on every
street corner and church and every highway and byway to loudly condemn the
corrupt, immoral, illegal practices of the present government?

William King

Please E-mail any answers to: wcking@tnaccess.com
Please E-mail copy to: apfn@apfn.org

Hi William: - Please go to APFN CONTENTS PAGE and maybe you can
find some of the answers.... 

AMERICAN PATRIOT FRIENDS NETWORK
http://www.apfn.org

THIS MESSAGE POSTED TO APFN MESSAGE BOARD:
http://disc.yourwebapps.com/Indices/149495.html


From: Jerry Pool jerryp@texramp.net
Re: Why?

Dear AFPN,the answer to your question is very simple. First of all it is in
prophecy that a "great falling form God", our Heavenly Father, would come
first before the coming of Christ. So these things must come to pass, but
the end is not yet. If you think things are bad now, just hold on to
your, whatever, cause you ain't seen nothing yet!! Everytime a people that
are called by God's name forsake Him, pay, and pay dearly.But you, [AFPN],
can see these things so "count it all when you do see these things, cause
"your redemption draweth nigh" The only hope for Amerika is for her to
repent from the top down and that just ain't gonna happen. Can you see Bill
Clinton sincerely humbling himself before God and the nation and asking for
God and the Amerikan people to forgive him, I mean realy being contrite
brokenhearted for his on sin and the sins of his predecessors? I think not. He
is as proud and rebellious as the rest of us toward God and we are paying
the price rite now but it is gonna get much much worse, but count it all
joy if you are a true follower of Christ, but if you are not then just
realize that you are on your way to hell just like the rest of the
heathens. Great tribulation is fast approaching and it is nothing like this
earth has ever seen before nor will ever see again. To the "scoffers" you
laugh me off now but don't think for one nano second that you will escape
judgment! it is coming and nobody gets out of this world alive! We can't
wipe our noses and other parts of our anatomy on the pages of the Bible
and the only other "inspired" document know to man, the constitution, and get
away with it forever. We will be judged and we will pay very soon, count on it.


Subject: Re: [Fwd: WHY?]
Date: Sun, 07 May 2000 08:13:22 -0700
From: Ray Earnest eraye@eatel.net
To: apfn@apfn.org

 Well, I can tell you in just a few words what our problems are,
  but to what avail?  If the truth was posted ten times each day,
  seven days per week, year in and year out,  what purpose can
  it serve?  People must yearn to be free in order to be free.  To
  sit comfortably by, enjoying the facade of plenty furnished by
  our enemies and complaining bitterly all of the time, is not con-
  ducive effort in loosening the bonds which tie us down.  Only
  free souls yearn to be free in body, and until that spirit can break
  through the wall of opposition created by false security of the
  body will it awaken us  to the dangers imposed upon it by its ene-
  mies.  We are a nation lulled to sleep by too much material-
  ism and propaganda, and until we can opt the other course, that
  of action, then we are wasting our time even discussing it.  Free-
  dom from tyranny is no different than freedom from alcoholism
  or other addiction; it must be those victims who decide to rid
  themselves of their tormentors, as no one else can do it for them.
It makes me ill to swallow the daily dose of garbage from the inter-
  net, prompting the people to rise up, contact your representatives
  for one purpose or other, and stop some evil bill that is awaiting
  enactment in the congress.  People, we have no representatives in
  government, at whatever division; these are the stooges of our en-
  emies; selected by them and brought to power by them, and for
  their own purposes of agenda.  They don't represent the people,
  so why waste time "contacting" them.  They have no more power
  of persuasion with our enemies than any other individual.  Sadly
  to say, these "representatives" must be considered the cannon fod-
  der of any uprising, if there is to be an uprising, of the people.  Most
  are as ignorant as ninety percent of the people, as to what is occur-
  ring around the world, but holding the power by them is no different
  than the soldier with a weapon; he must die, ignorant or not, be-
  cause he holds the weapon of opposition to our freedom.  As occurs
  in any war, the enemy may be a brother or other relative holding the
  reins of power, but he is still the enemy, and without destroying the
  enemy utterly we will always be dominated by them, and they will,
  and are, tightening the bonds around our feet daily.
We, as Americans, are sovereign unto ourselves as a birthright.  It mat-
  ters not than 99.9 percent of the population approves some "law" or
  regulation that is intrusive of my domain as a sovereign, as my natural,
  God given rights are unalienable, and there are no written or mutable
  definitions for that word.  It means, simply, that my rights cannot be
  taken by any power other than He who gave them to me; they cannot
  be given away, sold, traded, or otherwise discarded for any reason.
  This is the absolute right of all Americans, and the only way we can
  be relieved of this right is through the physical power which is greater
  than that of the individual, or of the whole, or-- by the Almighty God
  who gave this right.  Thus, we have two options; we can destroy our
  enemies, to the last individual, or we can place our faith and hope on
  our God, pray in unison for Him to deliver us, and offer ourselves to
  Him as battle axes to fulfill His delivery, as did the ancient Israelites.
  Both options lead to one conclusion.  We either fight or perish as men;
  slaves are not men, but property.  I am no man's property.


                                                     Ray Earnest


Subject:  Why?
Date:  Sun, 7 May 2000 22:50:44 +1000
From:  "Anthony Grigor-Scott" ags@biblebelievers.org.au
Reply-To:  "Anthony Grigor-Scott" ags@biblebelievers.org.au
To:  wcking@tnaccess.com
CC:  apfn@apfn.org


 Dear Brother William King, Christian greetings in the precious Name of our Lord Jesus Christ. The reason "Why" is because the Gentiles are apostate now that we are at the tail end of our Dispensation.  As God raised up Nebuchadnezzar to destroy Jerusalem and take Judah captive when they became apostate, He has raised up Russia and Communism to destroy America. He sent America and the world a prophet by the Name of William Branham (1909-1965). He always sends a prophet with warning and a way of escape before judgment. America rejected his Message as Israel rejected John the Baptist. Visit our Site and Check out the following URL's:- http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/nl117.htm What I have said is not "if" or "but", but THUS SAITH THE LORD. There will be an invasion shortly after the sinking of Los Angeles and several years after that, North America will be obliterated. It is time to become desperate about apprehending God in His Word. And I mean the PRESENT Truth, not something left over by Luther, Wesley or the Pentecostals. 
Yours sincerely in the love and service of our Lord Jesus Christ. Your brother-in-Christ, Anthony Grigor-Scott
MINISTER OF THE GOSPEL
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/
Subscribe on-line for Bible Believers' FREE Newsletter


Subject: Re: [Fwd: WHY?]
Date: Sun, 07 May 2000 04:17:31 -0500
From: Comments fair-request@fa-ir.org
To: apfn@apfn.org

The answer to all your questions is that lawyers have managed to destroy
our system of checks and balances of power between the three branches of
governments.

The Executive Branch (Governors Office) belongs to some lawyer. The
Legislative Branch either consist of lawyers or falls under lawyers control
through legislative committees. And of course the Judicial Branch is
suppose to be lawyers.

Each time someone votes a lawyer into the Governors mansion or their
legislature a piece of the Constitution dies.

Regards
James


Subject: RE: [Fwd: WHY?]
Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 03:44:39 -0400
From: "Tripp Henderssen" advocate_1@prodigy.net
Reply-To: advocate_1@prodigy.net
To: apfn@apfn.org

I am not shy, therefore, I will answer your questions:

-----Original Message-----
From: American Patriot Friends Network [mailto:apfn@apfn.org]
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2000 11:37 PM
To: American Patriot Friends Network
Subject: [Fwd: WHY?]


I'd like to ask ten little questions of you and my fellow Americans.

*****You are very naive, as your questions are basically moot:

Why is the United States of America being destroyed from within by the very
officials we expect to protect her from destruction?

*******Your expectations of our elected officials are awry. Those officials
do NOT do the bidding of the electorate, but rather the bidding of the PACS.

Why is our Constitution, the Law of our Land, being defiled by elected
officials who swore to uphold this same Constitution?

*********The Constitution is dead. It has been bastardized by those who obey
what they consider a higher law..

Why are no elected officials standing to defend the Constitution they swore
to protect from foreign enemies and domestic traitors?

***********Those whom you are referring to are engaging in a pogram against
you & me.

Why are the Laws of our land flagrantly disobeyed by elected officials?

************They have an agenda which pervades that which is ethical and
righteous.

Why is our Bill of Rights trashed by elected officials at all levels of
Gov.?

**************Those elected officials kowtow to a law which is anethemic to
your survival.

Why is the 2nd Amendment declaring our God given right to own and bear arms
being denied, suborned and infringed by elected officials sworn to protect
and defend all citizens rights?

*****************White Christians have the right to keep and bear firearms
directly from G-d.

Why are American citizens allowing elected officials to criminally harm
American citizens without demanding that this lawlessness be stopped?

*********************Your elected officials do what YOU require. If you
disagree with what they are doing, the onus is upon you. White Americans are
still approximately 68% of the demographic makeup of the United States.
THAT, my feathered friend, is a majority. Help them stick together.

Why is a supposedly free people allowing criminals disguised as Congressmen
to murder, rob, rule and disarm them?

************************Because they , as a group, are stupid. Prove me
wrong. Israel RULES. YOU are the slave.

Why are no decent, fearless, strong, assertive men and women standing on
every street corner and church and every highway and byway to loudly condemn
the corrupt, immoral, illegal practices of the present government?

**************************I have to assume YOU do not include yourself among
the strong, fearless and assertive, or.....  ...................you would be
standing on the corner, right, Mr. King?

William King


 

Subject:  Re: WHY?
Date:  Sat, 6 May 2000 23:06:52 -0700
From:  "Don Harkins" observer@dmi.net
Organization:  Idaho Observer
To:  "wcking" wcking@tnaccess.com
CC:  apfn@apfn.org
References:  016401bfb7cd$67bbc1c0$62d69bce@default

Most people are motivated by fear or greed.Very few people respond based on principle.T.V. and the Protocols of Zion explains it all. Ingri HarkinsThe Idaho ObserverP.O. Box 1353Rathdrum, ID 83858-1353(208)255-2307/fax 255-2607observer@dmi.netwww.proliberty.com/observer 


Subject: Re: [Fwd: WHY?]
Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 00:36:58 -0500 (CDT)
From: vimes@webtv.net
To: apfn@apfn.org

because its a nation populated by the scum of other countries.The guys
of the Constitution and founders are long ago dead.


 

Subject:  Re: [Fwd: WHY?]
Date:  Sun, 07 May 2000 01:28:57 -0400
From:  Big Al bigal123@ncol.net
To:  apfn@apfn.org
References:  3914E4C9.D9D1F5D@apfn.org


 
 

American Patriot Friends Network wrote:

-------- Original Message --------
 Subject: WHY?
    Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 21:27:41 -0500
    From: "wcking" wcking@tnaccess.com
Reply-To: "wcking" wcking@tnaccess.com
      To: apfn@apfn.org

 May 6, 2000

I'd like to ask ten little questions of you and my fellow Americans.

Why is the United States of America being destroyed from within by the very
officials we expect to protect her from destruction?  Because they are controlled by the bankers

Why is our Constitution, the Law of our Land, being defiled by elected
officials
who swore to uphold this same Constitution?  Because it is not the "law of the land"  Treaties are the law of the land and due process is the remedy found in the contract that is termed "Law of the Land"  See Ballentine Law Dictionary  3rd Ed page 714.

Why are no elected officials standing to defend the Constitution they swore
to protect from foreign enemies and domestic traitors?  They are but under the Lieber Code instituted by Lincoln  See Article 149 of the Lieber Code.

Why are the Laws of our land flagrantly disobeyed by elected officials? They are not really when you know what law they are bound to since 1863.

Why is our Bill of Rights trashed by elected officials at all levels of Gov.?  Simply because the Bill of right do not apply to the american, see Hepburn  Ellezy case, John Barron v Mayor and City of Baltimore 7 peters 243  And Padle ford & Fay v City and Mayor of Savanna Georgia

Why is the 2nd Amendment declaring our God given right to own and bear arms
being denied, suborned and infringed by elected officials sworn to protect and
defend all citizens rights?  Because the 2nd amendment is not for Americans and it does not say anything about a god given right in the constitution.  If it does show me the words to that effect?

Why are American citizens allowing elected officials to criminally harm
American citizens without demanding that this lawlessness be stopped? Because the stupid masses viote them back into office.  Stop being a member of the body politic and stop voting.

Why is a supposedly free people allowing criminals disguised as Congressmen to
murder, rob, rule and disarm them?  Because they love to be raped, robbed, murdered and controlled.  That's the nature of most mankind.

Why are no decent, fearless, strong, assertive men and women standing on every
street corner and church and every highway and byway to loudly condemn the
corrupt, immoral, illegal practices of the present government? Simply because there is not enought of us and passive resistance gets you nowhere.  Only armed conflict will rout out and destriy the criminals you speak of.  However no one wants to take the first bullet in defending freedom.  Would you take the first .308 traveling 3200 feet per second in the gut blowing out your entrails in 3/1000 of a second  and trying to stuff them back in while screaming in pain before dying for the cause?   Now you know why we are sheeeple.

Big Al


Subject: Re: [Fwd: WHY?]
Date: Sat, 06 May 2000 23:13:19 -0600
From: The Bum biblebum@frii.com
To: apfn@apfn.org

Because the White House has been stained with so much blood, it has turned
into a Red House!!!  UnAmerican for sure!

The Bum


Subject: Re: [Fwd: WHY?]
Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 00:56:42 EDT
From: EPPERSONRA@aol.com
To: apfn@apfn.org

    The reason to your question is easy:
    BECAUSE  EVERYTHING THE GOVERNMENT DOES TODAY IS CONSTITUTIONAL!!!!!!!!!
THEY HAVE THE POWER!!!!!!!!
    Our founding fathers created TWO governments in the Constitution of trhe
United States, and they gave one of them ABSOLUTE TYRANNICAL POWER!!!
    If you want to read the entire story, please send me an email, and I will
send you copies of my booklets entitled THE U C C CONNECTION, and AMERICA'S
SECRET DESTINY.
    But thanks for asking the question!



RE: ANSWER TO  WHY? From John A. Quayle

-------- Original Message --------

Subject:  Re: [Fwd: WHY?] - *THIS* Is Why!
Date:  Sun, 07 May 2000 04:00:35 -0400
From:  "John A. Quayle" blueoval@sgi.net
To:  apfn@apfn.org
CC:  wcking@tnaccess.com

 A CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER
by D.L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
Arranged and Edited by John Loeffler

In the mainline media, those who adhere to the position that there is some kind of "conspiracy" pushing us towards a world government are virulently ridiculed. The standard attack maintains that the so-called "New World Order" is the product of turn-of-the-century, right-wing, bigoted, anti-semitic racists acting in the tradition of the long-debunked Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, now promulgated by some Militias and other right-wing hate groups.

The historical record does not support that position to any large degree but it has become the mantra of the socialist left and their cronies, the media.

The term "New World Order" has been used thousands of times in this century by proponents in high places of federalized world government.
Some of those involved in this collaboration to achieve world order have been Jewish. The preponderance are not, so it most definitely is not a Jewish agenda.

For years, leaders in education, industry, the media, banking, etc.,
have promoted those with the same Weltanschauung (world view) as theirs. Of course, someone might say that just because individuals promote their friends doesn't constitute a conspiracy. That's true in the usual sense. However, it does represent an "open conspiracy," as described by noted Fabian Socialist H.G. Wells in The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution (1928).

In 1913, prior to the passage of the Federal Reserve Act President
Wilson's The New Freedom was published, in which he revealed:

"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the U. S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."

On November 21, 1933, President Franklin Roosevelt wrote a letter to Col. Edward Mandell House, President Woodrow Wilson's close advisor:

"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial
element in the larger centers has owned the Government every since the
days of Andrew Jackson..."

That there is such a thing as a cabal of power brokers who control
government behind the scenes has been detailed several times in this century by credible sources. Professor Carroll Quigley was Bill Clinton's mentor at Georgetown University. President Clinton has publicly paid homage to the influence Professor Quigley had on his life. In Quigley's magnum opus Tragedy and Hope (1966), he states:

"There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international.. .....network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies...but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known."

Even talk show host Rush Limbaugh, an outspoken critic of anyone
claiming a push for global government, said on his February 7, 1995
program:

"You see, if you amount to anything in Washington these days, it is because you have been plucked or handpicked from an Ivy League school -- Harvard, Yale, Kennedy School of Government -- you've shown an aptitude to be a good Ivy League type, and so you're plucked so-to-speak, and you are assigned success. You are assigned a certain role in government somewhere, and then your success is monitored and tracked, and you go where the pluckers and the handpickers can put you."

On May 4, 1993, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) president Leslie Gelb said on The Charlie Rose Show that:

"...you [Charlie Rose] had me on [before] to talk about the New World Order! I talk about it all the time. It's one world now. The Council [CFR] can find, nurture, and begin to put people in the kinds of jobs this country needs. And that's going to be one of the major enterprises of the Council under me."

Previous CFR chairman, John J. McCloy (1953-70), actually said they have been doing this since the 1940s (and before).

The thrust towards global government can be well-documented but at the end of the twentieth century it does not look like a traditional conspiracy in the usual sense of a secret cabal of evil men meeting clandestinely behind closed doors. Rather, it is a "networking" of like-minded individuals in high places to achieve a common goal, as described in Marilyn Ferguson's 1980 insider classic, The Aquarian Conspiracy.

Perhaps the best way to relate this would be a brief history of the New World Order, not in our words but in the words of those who have been striving to make it real.

1912 -- Colonel Edward M. House, a close advisor of President Woodrow
Wilson, publishes Phillip Dru: Administrator in which he promotes
"socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx."

1913 -- The Federal Reserve (neither federal nor a reserve) is created.
It was planned at a secret meeting in 1910 on Jekyl Island, Georgia by a
group of bankers and politicians, including Col. House. This transferred
the power to create money from the American government to a private
group of bankers. It is probably the largest generator of debt in the world.

May 30, 1919 -- Prominent British and American personalities establish
the Royal Institute of International Affairs in England and the Institute of International Affairs in the U.S. at a meeting arranged by Col. House attended by various Fabian socialists, including noted economist John Maynard Keynes. Two years later, Col. House reorganizes the Institute of International Affairs into the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

December 15, 1922 -- The CFR endorses World Government in its magazine Foreign Affairs. Author Philip Kerr, states:

"Obviously there is going to be no peace or prosperity for mankind as long as [the earth] remains divided into 50 or 60 independent states until some kind of international system is created...The real problem today is that of the world government."

1928 -- The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution by H.G.
Well is published. A former Fabian Socialist, Wells writes:

"The political world of the into a Open Conspiracy must weaken, efface, incorporate and supersede existing governments...The Open Conspiracy is the natural inheritor of socialist and communist enthusiasms; it may be in control of Moscow before it is in control of New York...The character of the Open Conspiracy will now be plainly displayed...It will be a world religion."

1931 -- Students at the Lenin School of Political Warfare in Moscow are taught:

"One day we shall start to spread the most theatrical peace movement the world has ever seen. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent ... will fall into the trap offered by the possibility of making new friends. Our day will come in 30 years or so...The bourgeoisie must be lulled into a false sense of security."

1931-- In a speech to the Institute for the Study of International Affairs at Copenhagen) historian Arnold Toyee said:

"We are at present working discreetly with all our might.to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world. All the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands...."

1932 -- New books are published urging World Order:

Toward Soviet America by William Z. Foster. Head of the Communist Party USA, Foster indicates that a National Department of Education would be one of the means used to develop a new socialist society in the U.S.

The New World Order by F.S. Marvin, describing the League of Nations as the first attempt at a New World Order. Marvin says, "nationality must
rank below the claims of mankind as a whole."

Dare the School Build a New Social Order? is published. Educator author George Counts asserts that:

"...the teachers should deliberately reach for power and then make the most of their conquest" in order to "influence the social attitudes, ideals and behavior of the coming generation...The growth of science and technology has carried us into a new age where ignorance must be replaced by knowledge, competition by cooperation, trust in Providence by careful planning and private capitalism by some form of social economy."

1933 -- The first Humanist Manifesto is published. Co-author John Dewey,
the noted philosopher and educator, calls for a synthesizing of all religions and "a socialized and cooperative economic order." Co-signer C.F. Potter said in 1930:

"Education is thus a most powerful ally of humanism, and every American public school is a school of humanism. What can the theistic Sunday schools, meeting for an hour once a week, teaching only a fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of humanistic teaching?"

1933 -- The Shape of Things to Come by H.G. Wells is published. Wells
predicts a second world war around 1940, originating from a German-Polish dispute. After 1945 there would be an increasing lack of public safety in "criminally infected" areas. The plan for the "Modern World-State" would succeed on its third attempt (about 1980), and come out of something that occurred in Basra, Iraq. The book also states,

"Although world government had been plainly coming for some years, although it had been endlessly feared and murmured against, it found no opposition prepared anywhere."

1934 -- The Externalization of the Hierarchy by Alice A. Bailey is published. Bailey is an occultist, whose works are channeled from a spirit guide, the Tibetan Master [demon spirit] Djwahl Kuhl. Bailey uses the phrase "points of light" in connection with a "New Group of World Servers" and claims that 1934 marks the beginning of "the organizing of the men and women...group work of a new order...[with] progress defined by service...the world of the Brotherhood...the Forces of Light...[and] out of the spoliation of all existing culture and civilization, the new world order must be built."

The book is published by the Lucis Trust, incorporated originally in New York as the Lucifer Publishing Company. Lucis Trust is a United Nations NGO and has been a major player at the recent U.N. summits. Later Assistant Secretary General of the U.N. Robert Mueller would credit the creation of his World Core Curriculum for education to the underlying
teachings of Djwahl Kuhl via Alice Bailey's writings on the subject.

1932 -- Plan for Peace by American Birth Control League founder Margaret Sanger (1921) is published. She calls for coercive sterilization, mandatory segregation, and rehabilitative concentration camps for all
"dysgenic stocks" including Blacks, Hispanics, American Indians and Catholics.

October 28, 1939 -- In an address by John Foster Dulles, later U.S.
Secretary of State, he proposes that America lead the transition to a new order of less independent, semi-sovereign states bound together by a league or federal union.

1939 -- New World Order by H. G. Wells proposes a collectivist one-world
state"' or "new world order" comprised of "socialist democracies." He
advocates "universal conscription for service" and declares that "nationalist individualism...is the world's disease." He continues:

"The manifest necessity for some collective world control to eliminate warfare and the less generally admitted necessity for a collective control of the economic and biological life of mankind, are aspects of one and the same process." He proposes that this be accomplished through "universal law" and propaganda (or education)."

1940 -- The New World Order is published by the Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace and contains a select list of references on regional and world federation, together with some special plans for world order after the war.

December 12, 1940 -- In The Congressional Record an article entitled A
New World Order John G. Alexander calls for a world federation.

1942 -- The leftist Institute of Pacific Relations publishes Post War
Worlds by P.E. Corbett:

"World government is the ultimate aim...It must be recognized that the law of nations takes precedence over national law...The process will have to be assisted by the deletion of the nationalistic material employed in educational textbooks and its replacement by material explaining the benefits of wiser association."

June 28, 1945 -- President Truman endorses world government in a speech:

"It will be just as easy for nations to get along in a republic of the
world as it is for us to get along in a republic of the United States."

October 24, 1945 -- The United Nations Charter becomes effective. Also
on October 24, Senator Glen Taylor (D-Idaho) introduces Senate Resolution 183 calling upon the U.S. Senate to go on record as favoring creation of a world republic including an international police force.

1946 -- Alger Hiss is elected President of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Hiss holds this office until 1949. Early in 1950, he is convicted of perjury and sentenced to prison after a sensational trial and Congressional hearing in which Whittaker Chambers, a former senior editor of Time, testifies that Hiss was a member of his Communist Party cell.

1946 -- The Teacher and World Government by former editor of the NEA
Journal (National Education Association) Joy Elmer Morgan is published.
He says:

"In the struggle to establish an adequate world government, the
teacher...can do much to prepare the hearts and minds of children for global understanding and cooperation...At the very heart of all the agencies which will assure the coming of world government must stand the school, the teacher, and the organized profession."

1947 -- The American Education Fellowship, formerly the Progressive
Education Association, organized by John Dewey, calls for the:

"...establishment of a genuine world order, an order in which national sovereignty is subordinate to world authority..."

October, 1947 -- NEA Associate Secretary William Carr writes in the NEA Journal that teachers should:

"...teach about the various proposals that have been made for the
strengthening of the United Nations and the establishment of a world citizenship and world government."

1948 -- Walden II by behavioral psychologist B.F. Skinner proposes "a
perfect society or new and more perfect order" in which children are reared by the State, rather than by their parents and are trained from birth to demonstrate only desirable behavior and characteristics. Skinner's ideas would be widely implemented by educators in the 1960s, 70s, and 80s as Values Clarification and Outcome Based Education.

July, 1948 -- Britain's Sir Harold Butler, in the CFR's Foreign Affairs,
sees "a New World Order" taking shape:

"How far can the life of nations, which for centuries have thought of
themselves as distinct and unique, be merged with the life of other nations? How far are they prepared to sacrifice a part of their sovereignty without which there can be no effective economic or political union?...Out of the prevailing confusion a new world is taking shape... which may point the way toward the new order...That will be the beginning of a real United Nations, no longer crippled by a split personality, but held together by a common faith."

1948 -- UNESCO president and Fabian Socialist, Sir Julian Huxley, calls
for a radical eugenic policy in UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy.
He states:

"Thus, even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy of
controlled human breeding will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake that much that is now unthinkable may at least become thinkable."

1948 -- The preliminary draft of a World Constitution is published by U.S. educators advocating regional federation on the way toward world federation or government with England incorporated into a European
federation.

The Constitution provides for a "World Council" along with a "Chamber of Guardians" to enforce world law. Also included is a "Preamble" calling upon nations to surrender their arms to the world government, and includes the right of this "Federal Republic of the World" to seize private property for federal use.

February 9, 1950 -- The Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee introduces Senate Concurrent Resolution 66 which begins:

"Whereas, in order to achieve universal peace and justice, the present Charter of the United Nations should be changed to provide a true world government constitution."

The resolution was first introduced in the Senate on September 13, 1949 by Senator Glen Taylor (D-Idaho). Senator Alexander Wiley (R-Wisconsin) called it "a consummation devoutly to be wished for" and said, "I understand your proposition is either change the United Nations, or change or create, by a separate convention, a world order." Senator Taylor later stated:

"We would have to sacrifice considerable sovereignty to the world
organization to enable them to levy taxes in their own right to support
themselves."

1950 -- In testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
international financier James P Warburg said:

"we shall have a world government, whether or not we like it. The
question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or
by conquest."

April 12, 1952 -- John Foster Dulles, later to become Secretary of State, says in a speech to the American Bar Association in Louisville, Kentucky, that "treaty laws can override the Constitution." He says treaties can take power away from Congress and give them to the President. They can take powers from the States and give them to the Federal Government or to some international body and they can cut across the rights given to the people by their constitutional Bill of Rights. A Senate amendment, proposed by GOP Senator John Bricker, would have provided that no treaty could supersede the Constitution, but it fails to pass by one vote.

1954 -- Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands establishes the Bilderbergers, international politicians and bankers who meet secretly on an annual basis.

1954 -- H. Rowan Gaither, Jr., President - Ford Foundation said to
Norman Dodd of the Congressional Reese Commission:

"...all of us here at the policy-making level have had experience with
directives...from the White House.... The substance of them is that we shall use our grant-making power so as to alter our life in the United States that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union."

1954 -- Senator William Jenner said:

"Today the path to total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by the Congress, the President, or the people....outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government, a bureaucratic elite which believes our Constitution is outmoded and is sure that it is the winning side.... All the strange developments in the foreign policy agreements may be traced to this group who are going to make us over to suit their pleasure.... This political action group has its own local political support organizations, its own pressure groups, its own vested interests, its foothold within our government, and its own propaganda apparatus."

1958 -- World Peace through World Law is published, where authors
Grenville Clark and Louis Sohn advocate using the U.N. as a governing
body for the world, world disarmament, a world police force and legislature.

1959 -- The Council on Foreign Relations calls for a New International
Order. Study Number 7, issued on November 25, advocated:

"...new international order [which] must be responsive to world
aspirations for peace, for social and economic change...an international
order...including states labeling themselves as 'socialist' [communist]."

1959 -- The World Constitution and Parliament Association is founded
which later develops a Diagram of World Government under the Constitution for the Federation of Earth.

1959 -- The Mid-Century Challenge to U.S. Foreign Policy is published,
sponsored by the Rockefeller Brothers' Fund. It explains that the U.S.:

"...cannot escape, and indeed should welcome...the task which history has imposed on us. This is the task of helping to shape a new world order in all its dimensions -- spiritual, economic, political, social."

September 9, 1960 -- President Eisenhower signs Senate Joint Resolution 170, promoting the concept of a federal Atlantic Union. Pollster and Atlantic Union Committee treasurer, Elmo Roper, later delivers an address titled, The Goal Is Government of All the World, in which he states:

"For it becomes clear that the first step toward World Government cannot be completed until we have advanced on the four fronts: the economic, the military, the political and the social."

1961 -- The U.S. State Department issues a plan to disarm all nations
and arm the United Nations. State Department Document Number 7277 is entitled Freedom From War: The U.S. Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. It details a three-stage plan to disarm all nations and arm the U.N. with the final stage in which "no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force."

March 1,1962 -- Sen. Clark speaking on the floor of the Senate about PL
87-297 which calls for the disbanding of all armed forces and the
prohibition of their re-establishment in any form whatsoever. "..This
program is the fixed, determined and approved policy of the government
of the United States."

1962 -- New Calls for World Federalism. In a study titled, A World
Effectively Controlled by the United Nations, CFR member Lincoln
Bloomfield states:

"...if the communist dynamic was greatly abated, the West might lose whatever incentive it has for world government."

The Future of Federalism by author Nelson Rockefeller is published. The one-time Governor of New York, claims that current events compellingly demand a "new world order," as the old order is crumbling, and there is "a new and free order struggling to be born." Rockefeller says there is:

"a fever of nationalism...[but] the nation-state is becoming less and
less competent to perform its international political tasks....These are some of the reasons pressing us to lead vigorously toward the true building of a new world order...[with] voluntary service...and our dedicated faith in the brotherhood of all mankind....Sooner perhaps than we may realize...there will evolve the bases for a federal structure of the free world."

1963 -- J. William Fulbright, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee speaks at a symposium sponsored by the Fund for the Republic, a left-wing project of the Ford Foundation:

"The case for government by elites is irrefutable...government by the people is possible but highly improbable."

1964 -- Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook II is published. Author Benjamin Bloom states:

"...a large part of what we call 'good teaching' is the teacher's ability to attain affective objectives through challenging the students' fixed beliefs."

His Outcome-Based Education (OBE) method of teaching would first be tried as Mastery Learning in Chicago schools. After five years, Chicago students' test scores had plummeted causing outrage among parents. OBE would leave a trail of wreckage wherever it would be tried and under whatever name it would be used. At the same time, it would become crucial to globalists for overhauling the education system to promote attitude changes among school students.

1964 -- Visions of Order by Richard Weaver is published. He describes:

"progressive educators as a 'revolutionary cabal' engaged in 'a
systematic attempt to undermine society's traditions and beliefs.'"

1967 -- Richard Nixon calls for New World Order. In Asia after Vietnam,
in the October issue of Foreign Affairs, Nixon writes of nations'
dispositions to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to
the evolution of a "new world order."

1968 -- Joy Elmer Morgan, former editor of the NEA Journal publishes The
American Citizens Handbook in which he says:

"the coming of the United Nations and the urgent necessity that it
evolve into a more comprehensive form of world government places upon
the citizens of the United States an increased obligation to make the most of their citizenship which now widens into active world citizenship."

July 26, 1968 -- Nelson Rockefeller pledges support of the New World
Order. In an Associated Press report, Rockefeller pledges that, "as
President, he would work toward international creation of a new world
order."

1970 -- Education and the mass media promote world order. In Thinking
About A New World Order for the Decade 1990, author Ian Baldwin, Jr.
asserts that:

"...the World Law Fund has begun a worldwide research and educational program that will introduce a new, emerging discipline -- world order -- into educational curricula throughout the world...and to concentrate some of its energies on bringing basic world order concepts into the mass media again on a worldwide level."

1972 -- President Nixon visits China. In his toast to Chinese Premier Chou En-lai, former CFR member and now President, Richard Nixon, expresses "the hope that each of us has to build a new world order."

May 18, 1972 -- In speaking of the coming of world government, Roy M.
Ash, director of the Office of Management and Budget, declares that:

"within two decades the institutional framework for a world economic community will be in place...[and] aspects of individual sovereignty will be given over to a supernational authority."

1973 -- The Trilateral Commission is established. Banker David Rockefeller organizes this new private body and chooses Zbigniew Brzezinski, later National Security Advisor to President Carter, as the
Commission's first director and invites Jimmy Carter to become a founding member.

1973 -- Humanist Manifesto II is published:

"The next century can be and should be the humanistic century...we stand at the dawn of a new age...a secular society on a planetary scale....As non-theists we begin with humans not God, nature not deity...we deplore the division of humankind on nationalistic grounds....Thus we look to the development of a system of world law and a world order based upon transnational federal government....The true revolution is occurring."

April, 1974 -- Former U. S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Trilateralist and CFR member Richard Gardner's article The Hard Road to World Order is published in the CFR's Foreign Affairs where he states
that:

"the 'house of world order' will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down...but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault."

1974 -- The World Conference of Religion for Peace, held in Louvain, Belgium is held. Douglas Roche presents a report entitled We Can  Achieve a New World Order.

The U.N. calls for wealth redistribution: In a report entitled New
International Economic Order, the U.N. General Assembly outlines a plan to redistribute the wealth from the rich to the poor nations.

1975 -- A study titled, A New World Order, is published by the Center of
International Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International
Studies, Princeton University.

1975 -- In Congress, 32 Senators and 92 Representatives sign A
Declaration of Interdependence, written by historian Henry Steele
Commager. The Declaration states that:

"we must join with others to bring forth a new world order...Narrow
notions of national sovereignty must not be permitted to curtail that
obligation."

Congresswoman Marjorie Holt refuses to sign the Declaration saying:

"It calls for the surrender of our national sovereignty to international organizations. It declares that our economy should be regulated by international authorities. It proposes that we enter a 'new world order' that would redistribute the wealth created by the American people."

1975 -- Retired Navy Admiral Chester Ward, former Judge Advocate General of the U.S. Navy and former CFR member, writes in a critique that the goal of the CFR is the "submergence of U. S. sovereignty and national
independence into an all powerful one-world government..."

1975 -- Kissinger on the Couch is published. Authors Phyllis Schlafly and former CFR member Chester Ward state:

"Once the ruling members of the CFR have decided that the U.S. government should espouse a particular policy, the very substantial research facilities of the CFR are put to work to develop arguments, intellectual and emotional, to support the new policy and to confound, discredit, intellectually and politically, any opposition..."

1976 -- RIO: Reshaping the International Order is published by the globalist Club of Rome, calling for a new international order, including an economic redistribution of wealth.

1977 -- The Third Try at World Order is published. Author Harlan
Cleveland of the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies calls for:

"changing Americans' attitudes and institutions" for "complete
disarmament (except for international soldiers)" and "for individual
entitlement to food, health and education."

1977 -- Imperial Brain Trust by Laurence Shoup and William Minter is
published. The book takes a critical look at the Council on Foreign
Relations with chapters such as: Shaping a New World Order: The
Council's Blueprint for Global Hegemony, 1939-1944 and Toward the
1980's: The Council's Plans for a New World Order.

1977 -- The Trilateral Connection appears in the July edition of Atlantic Monthly. Written by Jeremiah Novak, it says:

"For the third time in this century, a group of American schools,
businessmen, and government officials is planning to fashion a New World
Order..."

1977 -- Leading educator Mortimer Adler publishes Philosopher at Large
in which he says:

"...if local civil government is necessary for local civil peace, then
world civil government is necessary for world peace."

1979 -- Barry Goldwater, retiring Republican Senator from Arizona, publishes his autobiography With No Apologies. He writes:

"In my view The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power -- political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical. All this is to be done in the interest of creating a more peaceful, more productive world community. What the Trilateralists truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. They believe the abundant materialism they propose to create will overwhelm existing differences. As managers and creators of the system they will rule the future."

1984 -- The Power to Lead is published. Author James McGregor Burns
admits:

"The framers of the U.S. constitution have simply been too shrewd for us. The have outwitted us. They designed separate institutions that cannot be unified by mechanical linkages, frail bridges, tinkering. If we are to 'turn the Founders upside down' -- we must directly confront the constitutional structure they erected."

1985 -- Norman Cousins, the honorary chairman of Planetary Citizens for
the World We Chose, is quoted in Human Events:

"World government is coming, in fact, it is inevitable. No arguments for or against it can change that fact."

Cousins was also president of the World Federalist Association, an affiliate of the World Association for World Federation (WAWF), headquartered in Amsterdam. WAWF is a leading force for world federal government and is accredited by the U.N. as a Non-Governmental
Organization.

1987 -- The Secret Constitution and the Need for Constitutional Change is sponsored in part by the Rockefeller Foundation. Some thoughts of author Arthur S. Miller are:

"...a pervasive system of thought control exists in the United States... ...the citizenry is indoctrinated by employment of the mass media and the system of public education...people are told what to think about...the old order is crumbling...Nationalism should be seen as a dangerous social disease...A new vision is required to plan and manage the future, a global vision that will transcend national boundaries and eliminate the poison of nationalistic solutions...a new Constitution is necessary."

1988 -- Former Under-secretary of State and CFR member George Ball in a January 24 interview in the New York Times says:

"The Cold War should no longer be the kind of obsessive concern that it is. Neither side is going to attack the other deliberately...If we could internationalize by using the U.N. in conjunction with the Soviet Union, because we now no longer have to fear, in most cases, a Soviet veto, then we could begin to transform the shape of the world and might get the U.N. back to doing something useful...Sooner or later we are going to have to face restructuring our institutions so that they are not confined merely to the nation-states. Start first on a regional and ultimately you could move to a world basis."

December 7, 1988 -- In an address to the U.N., Mikhail Gorbachev calls
for mutual consensus:

"World progress is only possible through a search for universal human consensus as we move forward to a new world order."

May 12, 1989 --President Bush invites the Soviets to join World Order.
Speaking to the graduating class at Texas A&M University, Mr. Bush
states that the United States is ready to welcome the Soviet Union "back
into the world order."

1989 -- Carl Bernstein's (Woodward and Bernstein of Watergate fame) book Loyalties: A Son's Memoir is published. His father and mother had been members of the Communist party. Bernstein's father tells his son about the book:

"You're going to prove [Sen. Joseph] McCarthy was right, because all he was saying is that the system was loaded with Communists. And he was right...I'm worried about the kind of book you're going to write and about cleaning up McCarthy. The problem is that everybody said he was a liar; you're saying he was right...I agree that the Party was a force in the country."

1990 -- The World Federalist Association faults the American press.
Writing in their Summer/Fall newsletter, Deputy Director Eric Cox
describes world events over the past year or two and declares:

"It's sad but true that the slow-witted American press has not grasped the significance of most of these developments. But most federalists know what is happening...And they are not frightened by the old bug-a-boo of sovereignty."

September 11, 1990 -- President Bush calls the Gulf War an opportunity
for the New World Order. In an address to Congress entitled Toward a New World Order, Mr. Bush says:

"The crisis in the Persian Gulf offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times...a new world order can emerge in which the nations of the world, east and west, north and south, can prosper and live in harmony....Today the new world is struggling to be born."

September 25, 1990 -- In an address to the U.N., Soviet Foreign Minister
Eduard Shevardnadze describes Iraq's invasion of Kuwait as "an act of
terrorism [that] has been perpetrated against the emerging New World
Order." On December 31, Gorbachev declares that the New World Order
would be ushered in by the Gulf Crisis.

October 1, 1990 -- In a U.N. address, President Bush speaks of the:

"...collective strength of the world community expressed by the U.N...an historic movement towards a new world order...a new partnership of nations... a time when humankind came into its own...to bring about a revolution of the spirit and the mind and begin a journey into a...new age."

1991 -- Author Linda MacRae-Campbell publishes How to Start a Revolution at Your School in the publication In Context. She promotes the use of "change agents" as "self-acknowledged revolutionaries" and "co-conspirators."

1991 -- President Bush praises the New World Order in a State of Union
Message:

"What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea -- a new world order...to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind...based on shared principles and the rule of law....The illumination of a thousand points of light....The winds of change are with us now."

February 6, 1991 -- President Bush tells the Economic Club of New York:

"My vision of a new world order foresees a United Nations with a
revitalized peacekeeping function."

June, 1991 -- The Council on Foreign Relations co-sponsors an assembly
Rethinking America's Security: Beyond Cold War to New World Order which is attended by 65 prestigious members of government, labor, academia, the media, military, and the professions from nine countries. Later, several of the conference participants joined some 100 other world
leaders for another closed door meeting of the Bilderberg Society in
Baden Baden, Germany. The Bilderbergers also exert considerable clout in determining the foreign policies of their respective governments. While
at that meeting, David Rockefeller said in a speech:

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."

July, 1991 -- The Southeastern World Affairs Institute discusses the New
World Order. In a program, topics include, Legal Structures for a New
World Order and The United Nations: From its Conception to a New World Order. Participants include a former director of the U.N.'s General Legal Division, and a former Secretary General of International Planned
Parenthood.

Late July, 1991 -- On a Cable News Network program, CFR member and
former CIA director Stansfield Turner (Rhodes scholar), when asked about
Iraq, responded:

"We have a much bigger objective. We've got to look at the long run
here. This is an example -- the situation between the United Nations and Iraq -- where the United Nations is deliberately intruding into the sovereignty of a sovereign nation...Now this is a marvelous precedent (to be used in) all countries of the world..."

October 29, 1991 -- David Funderburk, former U. S. Ambassador to
Romania, tells a North Carolina audience:

"George Bush has been surrounding himself with people who believe in one-world government. They believe that the Soviet system and the American system are converging." The vehicle to bring this about, said
Funderburk, is the United Nations, "the majority of whose 166 member
states are socialist, atheist, and anti-American."

Funderburk served as ambassador in Bucharest from 1981 to 1985, when he resigned in frustration over U.S. support of the oppressive regime of the late Rumanian dictator, Nicolae Ceausescu.

October 30, 1991: -- President Gorbachev at the Middle East Peace Talks in Madrid states:

"We are beginning to see practical support. And this is a very significant sign of the movement towards a new era, a new age...We see both in our country and elsewhere...ghosts of the old thinking...When we rid ourselves of their presence, we will be better able to move toward a new world order...relying on the relevant mechanisms of the United Nations."

Elsewhere, in Alexandria, Virginia, Elena Lenskaya, Counsellor
to the Minister of Education of Russia, delivers the keynote address for
a program titled, Education for a New World Order.

1992 -- The Twilight of Sovereignty by CFR member (and former Citicorp Chairman) Walter Wriston is published, in which he claims:

"A truly global economy will require ...compromises of national
sovereignty...There is no escaping the system."

1992 -- The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) Earth Summit takes place in Rio de Janeiro this year, headed by Conference Secretary-General Maurice Strong. The main products of this summit are the Biodiversity Treaty and Agenda 21, which the U.S. hesitates to sign because of opposition at home due to the threat to sovereignty and economics. The summit says the first world's wealth must be transferred to the third world.

July 20, 1992 -- TIME magazine publishes The Birth of the Global Nation by Strobe Talbott, Rhodes Scholar, roommate of Bill Clinton at Oxford University, CFR Director, and Trilateralist, in which he writes:

"All countries are basically social arrangements...No matter how
permanent or even sacred they may seem at any one time, in fact they are all artificial and temporary...Perhaps national sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all...But it has taken the events in our own wondrous and terrible century to clinch the case for world government."

As an editor of Time, Talbott defended Clinton during his presidential campaign. He was appointed by President Clinton as the number two person at the State Department behind Secretary of State Warren Christopher, former Trilateralist and former CFR Vice-Chairman and Director. Talbott was confirmed by about two-thirds of the U.S. Senate despite his statement about the unimportance of national sovereignty.

September 29, 1992 -- At a town hall meeting in Los Angeles, Trilateralist and former CFR president Winston Lord delivers a speech
titled Changing Our Ways: America and the New World, in which he
remarks:

"To a certain extent, we are going to have to yield some of our
sovereignty, which will be controversial at home...[Under] the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)...some Americans are going to be hurt as low-wage jobs are taken away."

Lord became an Assistant Secretary of State in the Clinton administration.

1992 -- President Bush addressing the General Assembly of the U.N said:

"It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance."

Winter, 1992-93 -- The CFR's Foreign Affairs publishes Empowering the
United Nations by U.N. Secretary General Boutros-Boutros Ghali, who
asserts:

"It is undeniable that the centuries-old doctrine of absolute and exclusive sovereignty no longer stands...Underlying the rights of the individual and the rights of peoples is a dimension of universal sovereignty that resides in all humanity...It is a sense that increasingly finds expression in the gradual expansion of international law...In this setting the significance of the United Nations should be evident and accepted."

1993 -- Strobe Talbott receives the Norman Cousins Global Governance
Award for his 1992 TIME article, The Birth of the Global Nation and in
appreciation for what he has done "for the cause of global governance."
President Clinton writes a letter of congratulation which states:

"Norman Cousins worked for world peace and world government..... ...Strobe Talbott's lifetime achievements as a voice for global harmony have earned him this recognition...He will be a worthy recipient of the Norman Cousins Global Governance Award. Best wishes...for future success."

Not only does President Clinton use the specific term, "world
government," but he also expressly wishes the WFA "future success" in
pursuing world federal government. Talbott proudly accepts the award,
but says the WFA should have given it to the other nominee, Mikhail
Gorbachev.

July 18, 1993 -- CFR member and Trilateralist Henry Kissinger writes in
the Los Angeles Times concerning NAFTA:

"What Congress will have before it is not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system...a first step toward a new world order."

August 23, 1993 -- Christopher Hitchens, Socialist friend of Bill Clinton when he was at Oxford University, says in a C-Span interview:

"...it is, of course the case that there is a ruling class in this country, and that it has allies internationally."

October 30, 1993 -- Washington Post ombudsman Richard Harwood does an op-ed piece about the role of the CFR's media members:

"Their membership is an acknowledgment of their ascension into the American ruling class [where] they do not merely analyze and interpret foreign policy for the United States; they help make it."

January/February, 1994 -- The CFR's Foreign Affairs prints an opening
article by CFR Senior Fellow Michael Clough in which he writes that the
"Wise Men" (e.g. Paul Nitze, Dean Acheson, George Kennan, and John J.
McCloy) have:

"assiduously guarded it [American foreign policy] for the past 50
years...They ascended to power during World War II...This was as it should be. National security and the national interest, they argued must transcend the special interests and passions of the people who make up America...How was this small band of Atlantic-minded internationalists able to triumph ...Eastern internationalists were able to shape and staff the burgeoning foreign policy institutions...As long as the Cold War endured and nuclear Armageddon seemed only a missile away, the public was willing to tolerate such an undemocratic foreign policy making system."

1994 -- In the Human Development Report, published by the UN Development Program, there was a section called "Global Governance For the 21st Century". The administrator for this program was appointed by Bill Clinton. His name is James Gustave Speth. The opening sentence of the report said:

"Mankind's problems can no longer be solved by national government. What is needed is a World Government. This can best be achieved by strengthening the United Nations system."

1995 -- The State of the World Forum took place in the fall of this year, sponsored by the Gorbachev Foundation located at the Presidio in San Francisco. Foundation President Jim Garrison chairs the meeting of who's-whos from around the world including Margaret Thatcher, Maurice Strong, George Bush, Mikhail Gorbachev and others. Conversation centers around the oneness of mankind and the coming global government. However, the term "global governance" is now used in place of "new world order" since the latter has become a political liability, being a lightning rod for opponents of global government.

1996 -- The United Nations 420-page report Our Global Neighborhood is published. It outlines a plan for "global governance," calling for an international Conference on Global Governance in 1998 for the purpose of submitting to the world the necessary treaties and agreements forratification by the year 2000.

--end--

        OUTSTANDING - APFN@apfn.org


From: "+ Sovereign +" wallace@bravenet.net
To: apfn@apfn.org

As Pat Robertson said, "The Rockefellers are like the dog who barked at and
chased the car .... but once the car was caught, had no idea what to do with
it". The NWO lives on in the imaginations of men, but nobody wants the reality
of such a horrible thing ... fantasy is better.

The NWO concept is as old as dirt .... my grandma gave me a book with a
"prescription for NWO" copyrighted 1945 ... Mr. House, the right hand man ..
er .. left hand man, of Woodrow Wilson, was planning such ideas back in 1912. 

Utopians will always resort to their "Dr. Evil fantasy worlds" to keep their
testosterone levels up ... nothing new there. 

What IS different is the "shrinking world" phenomena enabled by the Internet
....that bodes well for freedom if we play our cards right ... but if we give
up control of digital communication, the NWO idea advances.  Be careful not to
get snookered by fatalist propaganda.  These little propagandist men "behind
the curtain" are very small men indeed ... but they will convince you that
they are The Wizard of Oz .... stand firm and boldly -- we will win should we
ever be forced to prove our strength.


From: Jon Roland  jon.roland@constitution.org
To: apfn@apfn.org
References: 39153242.BF872CEE@apfn.org

We have a cleaner version of "A Chronological History of the New World Order"
by D.L. Cuddy at http://www.constitution.org/col/cuddy_nwo.htm


From: Neal AlChalabihungry@sasquatch.com

To: Apfn@apfn.org

This email presents a recent picture of the New World Order.  Presenting
such an entity as a network of concerned people has truth to it.  The
historical accounts of authors on the premise of the New World Order were
discussing something which has existed since before the King and Queen of France were executed as a result of their machinations.

The United States of America created a classless egalitarian society in an idealistic sense, which opposed the traditional old world with its oligarchy, its classes, its injustice, its tyranny and its slavery.

As our courts tear us apart as criminals and oligarchic interests pass laws to criminalize those who don't believe as they do, we see the New World Order emerging for the first time to the public, from behind its veil of secrecy.

To say that there are concerned individuals throughout our recent history who have dreamed of a new world order based on our egalitarian belief of mutual respect is to echo a certainty which no one may dispute.

To believe that the machinations of our time are the result of a network of these concerned people is to return to a time when people believed fluoride was good for your teeth and mercury fillings weren't poisoning you.

Seeing that even with a great foundation like the Constitution of the United States how easily the system may be corrupted, do we want to let go to of this?  Do we want to believe that this concerned network of individuals is truly running the show (they may think they are) and is going to give us a new world order the protects our Constitutional Rights.

Let's look at the facts.  The influence of the New World Order has been first to dismantle the Constitution, as can be seen by noting our political leaders and their agendas.

Do you think the new world order is here to bring you an egalitarian free society?  If so, go get a lobotomy.  It won't hurt.

Neal


From: Barton A Buhtz eclok@juno.com
To: apfn@apfn.org

We are.  We are on the new highway and byway...the Internet.  Your
message is reaching a far greater number than you can fathom...worldwide.
 Now do you understand why the "Public Servants" in Washington, etc. are
so intent on controlling the Internet?  That is where the new revolution
may well take place.  That is also why they may well see to it that the
Internet is sabotaged...
Bart


From: Toanangel pix108@frontiernet.net
To: wcking@tnaccess.com, apfn@apfn.org

WE are Created in the likeness and image of GOD
therefore in our wakefulness e have HIS Power to change our Self.

In our slumber We choose to allow negation of Truth as
lies, fraud and deceit to continue.

Perhaps, William, We the people have
by Our grace allowed the liars enough rope to hang themselves.

PEACE
Charles Pixley


From: enki@webtv.net (enki@ nibiru)
To: apfn@apfn.org

look around and the chemtrail issue. why are unmarked jets probably CIA
or NSA BEING ALLOWED TO RELEASE PLUMES OF UNKNOWNS IN OUR ATMOSPHERE AT
18,000 ft. right in our face and nobody can get any answers.
why do  elected officials think they are above the law and decieve us in
every way for there own self gratificiation.
why no matter who you vote for it seems to get worse with regards to
freedoms, liberty. why was MTBE ever put in our gasoline even when the
powers that be knew it was a poison. why are the dangers of ELF waves
not discussed in a rational way among people. why are microwave cell
phone towers being put everywhere a half a mile from one another   in
all directions.  why were our people in the gulf war subject to toxins
and unknown poisons that are making them sick and the gov't says they
know nothing. why was aspartame ever allowed into public consumption
when the powers that be knew it was a poison. why are children being
pumped full of psychotic drugs at an early age creating potential
monsters in our society. why doesnt congress ever answer these
questions. why does the majority of the populatiion don't care. why does
state and federal govt's squander peoples money on worthless projects
and the following year want more money saying they need more. why do
people who are evil always rise to the top in positions of power. why
does the media support all of the above.. where do we go from here. are
there enough caring intelligent people left who can wield enough power
to do anything before it's too late.


From: "Oceana" kiribili@corecomm.net
To: apfn@apfn.org

Subject: WHY?
    Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 21:27:41 -0500
    From: "wcking"
Reply-To: "wcking" wcking@tnaccess.com
      To: apfn@apfn.org

May 6, 2000

I'd like to ask ten little questions of you and my fellow Americans.
OKAY, I SHALL ATTEMPT TO REPLY WITH CLARITY:
Why is the United States of America being destroyed from within by the very
officials we expect to protect her from destruction?
BECAUSE THE BASTARDS YOU ELECT ARE SHEEP IN WOLVES CLOTHING.  THEY ARE
ENEMIES OF YOUR LIBERTY, NOT PROTECTORATES.
Why is our Constitution, the Law of our Land, being defiled by elected
officials who swore to uphold this same Constitution?
BECAUSE THE "CONSTITUTION," AS YOU KNOW IT, IS A SHELL, A FACADE OF REALITY
FROM THE PAST, WHICH WAS CAST ASIDE IN 1933 WITHOUT YOUR (OR YOUR
GRANDPARENTS) KNOWLEDGE.

Why are no elected officials standing to defend the Constitution they swore
to protect from foreign enemies and domestic traitors?
BECAUSE IT DOES NOT EXIST EXCEPT IN THE MINDS OF THE PEOPLE.  THE TAKING OF
THE OATH IS AN UNIMPORTANT RITUAL TO THEM TODAY.

Why are the Laws of our land flagrantly disobeyed by elected officials?
BECAUSE THE "LAWS OF THE LAND" ARE STATUTES TODAY, UN-GOVERNED BY ANY HIGHER
LAW.

Why is our Bill of Rights trashed by elected officials at all levels of
Gov.?  FOR THE SAME REASON AS IMMEDIATELY ABOVE.

Why is the 2nd Amendment declaring our God given right to own and bear arms
being denied, suborned and infringed by elected officials sworn to protect
and defend all citizens rights?
YOU CONTINUE TO OPERATE UNDER THE DELUSION THAT THE CONSTITUTION AND BILL OF
RIGHTS ARE FIRMLY IN PLACE TODAY.  YOU ARE IN A NEAR-POLICE STATE.  THE
TAKING OF THE FIREARMS WILL BE THE FINAL STEP TO TYRANNY.

Why are American citizens allowing elected officials to criminally harm
American citizens without demanding that this lawlessness be stopped?
WHAT IS YOUR RECOMMENDATION?

Why is a supposedly free people allowing criminals disguised as Congressmen
to murder, rob, rule and disarm them?
WHAT IS YOUR PLAN TO STOP IT?

Why are no decent, fearless, strong, assertive men and women standing on
every street corner and church and every highway and byway to loudly condemn
the corrupt, immoral, illegal practices of the present government?
BECAUSE, SWEET WILLIAM, THEY HAVE BEEN DUMBED-DOWN, BY THE EDUCATION SYSTEM,
THE NEWS MEDIA, AND THE LYING POLITICIANS.  ("Once we get the
Democrats/Republicans out of there, everything will be all right.")

William King


From: PBurke113@aol.com

To: wcking@tnaccess.com
CC: apfn@apfn.org

As promised, here are responses and proposed solutions to questions posed in
"Why?"

Mr. King,
OK, I'm taking up the challenge you posed in "Why?". Please understand that
I'm not at all cynical about your question, nor do I disagree with the reply
I received today outlining your organization. This is an attempt to answer
your questions in my own words, as I see it, without parroting dogma or
doctrine. With that as a preface, allow me to explore each of your questions.

1. Why is the United States of America being destroyed from within by the
very officials we expect to protect her from destruction?

    There are two possible answers to this question. One is that, as we've
heard, there is a Masonic plot to create a one-world super-government, and
enough members of Congress to give the idea support and sustenance, and that
there is little use in resisting because we have already been compromised and
continue to lose liberties. The second possibility is that, because we have
grown so large so quickly, our sense of true national pride has fallen, in
the past 30 years or so, to a kind of factionalism. Where we once recognized
ourselves as a proud and distinct people, we now want something for
ourselves, and those like us, however we perceive. It is the "me" generation
in its maturity. In the past decade, our long-time enemy has quit the
battlefield, and left us with only the sound of our own heartbeat and the
murmurings of tin horn dictators. We were aware of the tin horn dictators
before, but we found the sound of our own heartbeat to be surprising and
alien to what we thought it would be. So many interests surged to fill the
void. In this condition, many dropped out of participation, overwhelmed by
the cacophony. Only political  enthusiasts and special interests and
well-meaning dilettantes participated with any depth. Otherwise, those who
saw themselves as conservatives followed that voting pattern, and those who
identified with more liberal ideas, voted along those lines. The problem
developed when, under present executive leadership, we failed to identify
what an American was, and thereby our leaders, to the present day,  have no
light by which they are guided, no sense of direction.
     Perhaps the most destructive phrase which emerged during the last 30
years is that, "there is no bad and there is no good...just different." It
has compromised our sense of responsibility to right and wrong and it had
robbed us of our unity.
    Proposed solution: only by becoming interested in the actions of our
officials will we regain a feeling that we are one people. A very good and
practical idea would be a very public exposure of the voting record of each
of our elected officials, especially those in both halls of Congress,
presented in such a way that people might care to review it.


2. Why is our Constitution, the law of our land, being defiled by elected
officials who swore to uphold this same Constitution?

    Building on the answer to the previous question, I believe that those
elected to office have little sense of the Constitution as a time-honored
document. They see it, perhaps, as a radio which can be tweaked for different
sounds. So often I hear the statement, "that was then and this is now,"
bandied about as an excuse for change. Concerning the Constitution, I get the
idea that there are people out there - elected people - who yearn for a "new
deal", but only know enough to tear down the old deal rather than know where
they want to go with the new one.
    Proposed solution: a summit level debate on the interpretation of the
first and second amendments, featuring those who are known to be most vocal
(I would put forward Rush Limbaugh's name as one of those debaters)


3. Why are no elected officials standing to defend the Constitution they
swore to protect from foreign enemies and domestic traitors?

    Because many elected officials are lawyers (or are advised by lawyers),
the rule elected officials follow is never to bring suit without clear and
admissible proof. In domestic affairs, I believe that elected officials feel
that "rocking the boat" with accusations against a traitor endangers the
welfare of the team which got that official elected. Accusing traitors is not
seen as a necessary step to govern one's district. If one is not re-elected
because one has created a scandal, it negates all the good that might have
been done had one just shut one's trap and gone about the day to day business
of creating and passing bills, which is what people think elected officials
are there for. Besides, what does a traitor look like? We haven't brought one
to justice since the Rosenberg's in the early 1950s, and those who lived
through the period, or at least studied it, know what was thought of the
Macarthy years.
    Proposed solution: someone is going to have to go to the mat on this one,
and in such a way that neither the public nor the media can ignore the
implication. One problem of this tactic is that justice grinds exceedingly
fine, but oh so slowly.


4. Why are the laws of the land flagrantly disobeyed by elected officials?

    This one, unfortunately, is easy. The laws of the land are flagrantly
disobeyed by elected officials because the media, the one entity that could
bring such miscreants to public scrutiny, simply will not do it unless it
feels threatened. We can speculate ad nauseum as to why they won't do it, but
the fact remains that the press will only operate as a reactionary body, and
only in its own interest.
    Proposed solution: lawsuits must be filed and voters must be informed of
it. Elected officials must come to know that they will operate as a "lame
duck" if they are found to disobey the laws which they uphold. There need to
be more recalls of officials when they are found to be corrupt, while
carefully avoiding the use of this as a tactic to eliminate a political
rival. Politicians and political aspirants who make accusations against
others during elections must be given an opportunity in the media to prove
the accusations, but must also be made to verify those same accusations.


5. Why is our Bill of Rights trashed by elected officials at all levels of
government?

    The Bill of Rights is, also, a Bill of Responsibilities. What has
happened to the Bill of Rights is that it has become far too convoluted by
commentary. Its language is plain and its meaning clear.
    Proposed solution: we must, if the Bill of Rights is to remain a strong
document, scrap the commentary (and case law) and reaffirm the Bill of Right
in its pure state, while holding each and every word to be unassailable. I
believe that it could stand such a barnacle scraping and remain a central
document in affirming the rights of every citizen of the United States.


6. Why is the 2nd Amendment declaring our God-given right to own and bear
arms being denied, suborned and infringed by elected officials sworn to
protect and defend all citizen's rights?

    Again, the media has an active hand in the actions of our elected
officials, and because the media is protected by the Bill of Rights, it
reports abuses of weapons with impunity. Elected officials who wish to be
elected must react to these reports, and the only response available to be
reported is one which supports a suppression of guns for the common citizen.
By viewing thousands of violent actions by fictional armed TV actors during
the course of any year, is it any wonder that gentle people of every stripe
would entertain the possibility of a world without guns?
    Proposed solution: In this case, there is none. Those who misuse weapons
are the enemy here, and unless there is a curbing of domestic gun violence,
those who would see a nation disarmed will have their day. The obvious
solution, if there is one, is to make sure those who have guns act
responsibly with them.


7. Why are American citizens allowing elected officials to criminally harm
American citizens without demanding that this lawlessness be stopped?

    Alluding to Waco and Ruby Ridge, this question strikes at the root of a
paradox in our attitudes towards law enforcement personnel. On one hand, we
grew up with TV shows and instructional literature which tells us that "the
policeman is our friend." On the other hand, the policemen's business is very
nasty stuff and, like the making of sausage and laws, is not pretty in its
application. So what do we do when we see our friend the policeman engaged in
such complex engagements as the two cited above? Who gets the benefit of the
doubt here? Remember also...Janet Reno is not an elected official, nor were
the BATF agents who stormed Waco. We can find an elected official in this
mix, but the responsibility, in these cases was not wrought by an elected
official...at least not directly.
    Proposed solution: In cases of abuses of justice, such as those cited
above, the system must respond to public pressure when an investigation is
called for. And there must be a louder call for investigation by and of
elected officials where they are found culpable or where they have the power
to correct the abuse.

8. Why is a supposedly free people allowing criminals disguised as
Congressmen to murder, rob, and disarm them?

    This happens because people, by and large,  are no more interested in the
actions of Congress can be got by reading the morning newspaper. If it
doesn't touch them directly, they plead a fundamental ignorance to
Congressional (or even legislative) machinations. If you don't know the
facts, don't get into the fray. For the most part, we relegate the business
of governing to elected officials and leave involvement at our
representative's door.
    Proposed solution: Congress in particular must be more in touch with its
constituency. Likewise, the constituency must demand more prior knowledge in
governmental affairs. The idea that a Congressman can vote with impunity in
any manner he/she sees fit is absurd.


9. Why are no decent, fearless, strong, assertive men and women standing on
every street corner and church and every highway and byway to loudly condemn
the corrupt, illegal practice of the present government?

    Britain has a tradition of street corner speakers, and they get scant
recognition from the passing public. In this country, the public avoids, and
has always avoided, street corner speakers as slightly quirky and not to be
encouraged. Then again, Dr. King, what corner or byway can you be found on?
And if you have, what was the reaction? Did it make you savor doing it again?
    Proposed solution: Bag the street corner grass roots route. Vote. Vote.
Vote. Write. Write. Write. If you would have your ideas believed by many,
many must hear you. If you pass the word one by one, you'll run out of steam
long before you run out of message.
 
10. There is no 10th question.


Patrick M. Burke - PBurke113@aol.com


 

-------- Original Message --------

Subject:  Ten Little Questions
Date:  Mon, 8 May 2000 20:48:44 -0600
From:  "Charles Judd" 110404.2336@compuserve.com
To:  wcking@tnaccess.com


 Mr. William King: Yep, I have those questions too.  You probably know of Larry Klayman's Judicial Watch, Lary Becraft, Joe Bannister, Devvy Kidd, Alan Gottlieb, Bob Schultz and many other Patriots who are trying to defend our constitution.  What if someone could organize a single non-profit organization to combat just what you are referring to.  It would have a name such as "Constitutional Defenders."  20 million members with an annual budget of $2 billion dollars, 100 or more first class lawyers who would be dedicated patriots.  Every state and federal law would be scrutinized, every act of the State Department, every executive order, every effort of the UN.  The organization would be sqeaky clean with regular certified audits to its members and the public at large.  It would be a citizen's watchdog group with a record of excellence unmatched.  Its sole purpose would be to defend the constitution and the soverignty of our country.  When any public official steps out of line with the constitution, a lawsuit would be filed. Is this possible?  Of course it is.  Is it necessary?  Our country and  liberty are at stake.


From Charlie Judd, 17104 E. Adriatic Dr. C-109, Aurora, CO 80013 303-671-9864 110404.2336@compuserve.com  

Government Control Can Be Controlled
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/control.htm


RE: WHY?

Subscribe to apfn-1
Powered by groups.yahoo.com

AMERICAN PATRIOT FRIENDS NETWORK  [APFN]       

Please freely distribute contents of this site!

APFN IS NOT A BUSINESS

APFN IS SUPPORTED BY "FREE WILL" GIFT/DONATIONS

Without Justice, there is JUST_US!
"...a network of net workers..."

Without Justice, there is JUST_US!
http://www.apfn.org

APFN Message Board

APFN Sitemap

APFN Contents Page

APFN Home Page

   

E-Mail:  apfn@apfn.org

  Hit Counter

Last updated 12/27/2010